What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Wisconsin Women's Hockey 2025-2026

Interesting goal review on the Hall goal. Many questions. If the puck goes in deflection off the scorer's hand while the hand is on the stick, is that 'no goal' because of the hand, or 'goal" because it was on the stick. I'm not sure the puck didn't deflect off the stick directly, but it might have been off hand, then stick, the other hand.
 
Interesting goal review on the Hall goal. Many questions. If the puck goes in deflection off the scorer's hand while the hand is on the stick, is that 'no goal' because of the hand, or 'goal" because it was on the stick. I'm not sure the puck didn't deflect off the stick directly, but it might have been off hand, then stick, the other hand.
If she was standing up, and the puck went off her hand, and she was moving forward with that hand like she was shooting, would that be a goal? Seems like a very feasible play that I don't think I would question as a goal, but since she was on the ice and pushed instead of swinging, it's called into question. To me the, an uninformed fan. I would think the most important thing is she kept both hands on the stick. She didn't open hand grab or throw the puck. That would take if it hit her glove or the stick out of the equation.
 
If she was standing up, and the puck went off her hand, and she was moving forward with that hand like she was shooting, would that be a goal? Seems like a very feasible play that I don't think I would question as a goal, but since she was on the ice and pushed instead of swinging, it's called into question. To me the, an uninformed fan. I would think the most important thing is she kept both hands on the stick. She didn't open hand grab or throw the puck. That would take if it hit her glove or the stick out of the equation.
Dumb and dumber determined the puck went directly off the stick… had it been DIRECTED in by the glove, even while holding the stick it would be no goal.
Picard injury appears season and career ending. 3rd time on same knee. Such a shame for such a great person.
 
Dumb and dumber determined the puck went directly off the stick… had it been DIRECTED in by the glove, even while holding the stick it would be no goal.
Picard injury appears season and career ending. 3rd time on same knee. Such a shame for such a great person.
D & D got the call right, shockingly. Of course they also reviewed the most obvious goal of all time. They need to make the net looser and pad the inside more to make it easier to see it was a goal.

Hopefully, somehow, you are wrong on Picard.
 
Back
Top