Re: Wisconsin Hockey Vol XXV: There's Hope! Or whatever...
with wisconsin now joing the ultra weak B6 hockey league and on paper looks as of they will be in the running to win it, you can see a second straight ncca tourney appearance for the boys....and if that happens then you can bet the farm eaves will be around no less then 2 more years.....in fact if you wanted eaves out that bad the wcha schedule would have done it alot faster then this very weak B6 schedule is going to do...and if your worried lack of attendance will alvarez and his B6 hockey league buudies will contribute to the cause and then who knows what time or night of the week we wil be playing is also going to be an absolute huge factor in lack of attendance......but dont worry like chuck says we will be on tv mre and playing B6 hockey teams so all will be well.....right now with all variables playing into this Eaves has no less then 3 years coaching in the B6 hockey league.....
I really don't get all the distain for B6. Initially I was apprehensive about it, but have grown to actually prefer that to status quo in a bloated WCHA. When the WCHA added Bemidji and UNO, it was time to go. For me the allure of the WCHA was getting to play the marquee programs and when you added 2 nonmarque...teams you watered down the abilty to play the North Dakota, Minnesotas, Denver, UMD, CC, SCSU. I have little interest in watching Tech, AA, Bemidji, UNO, Mankato...ever. UNO has the capability of being a solid program, but has little or no history with UW and the other 4 are perennially just not good. For me WCHA verses B6 is not any different in terms of quality of conference going in and the B6 has the potential to be MUCH better then what the WCHA was.
Here's my take on the old and the new:
Elites (National Championship pedicree, facilities, tradition, ect) WCHA:Minny, North Dakota, Denver, UW B6:Minny, UW, Michigan
MidTier (sometimes elite, but generally at least good to solid) WCHA: UMD, SCSU, CC, UNO B6: MSU
Basement (occasionally a blip on the national scene...but generally not) WCHA: AA, Tech, Mankato, Bemidji B6: Penn St, OSU
I was hesitant to put MSU in the 2nd tier as they are probably much closer to the top tier then any of the old WCHA teams I put in the next rung. When you compare the potential of Penn St & OSU to the teams in the bottom category of the WCHA...there is no comparison in terms of coaching, facilities, budget....generally the ability to get to at worst the mid tier. Oz and the comittment Pagula made to PSU will likely have both very very solid programs (hell, they already are). For every game against Tech, Bemidji, AA, Mankato, you weren't getting a game against North Dakota or Denver. How many years since the expansion of the WCHA did we not have 8 games against Denver/North Dakota (2 each at our place and theirs)? The answer is EVERY ONE. First year we played Denver/NoDak 6 times and this season we played them 4 with NONE at the Kohl Center...repeating that NONE. Hell we had a total of ONE home game against Denver, Minny, and North Dakota this season. The WCHA had become not what the WCHA once was and it was never going back...so time to move on. I'm excited knowing we will get 12 games a year against Minny, MSU, and Michigan and have the schedule flexibility that we can play North Dakota, Denver, and more Eastern powers then we have been able to with the bloated WCHA.