ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. XXIV - Craziest Season Of All Time

The streak was nice, but is the new normal for Wisconsin Hockey that we are satisfied with mediocre because it's better than being horrible?
It certainly isn't for me and I will continue to voice my displeasure with it and challenge those who think that this is good enough for a program like the Badgers.
In regards to the steak and what it meant...
With the streak, I think that the team has elevated itself to mediocre, which I also think is its potential. As someone else said, we're probably a .500 team.
Evidently, I'm supposed to be excited about this after 2 other mediocre seasons.
The streak was nice, certainly better than the alternative, but we made a lot of hay against some traditionally weak competition. I know we beat Denver and swept MSU at their place (nothing for a program to hang its hat on, but we had never done it), but we also could only manage 2 ties against Tech here.
I would like to believe that at some point we are striving to play in series like what we saw this weekend between UND and Minny. Series where something beyond getting back to mediocre is at stake. Series between two elite teams trying to win the conference, not one elite team and one scrappy team trying to slow the tempo to the point where they can steal a tie.
I don't see this happening this year or next or next.
The streak was nice, but is the new normal for Wisconsin Hockey that we are satisfied with mediocre because it's better than being horrible?
It certainly isn't for me and I will continue to voice my displeasure with it and challenge those who think that this is good enough for a program like the Badgers.
Using your keen hockey mind, can you tell the rest of us WHY the PP isn't scoring? Lack of shots is not an acceptable answer.
If you don't have a lane to shoot in you are not likely to score goals either (and are likely to give up a SH opportunity the other way as the puck deflects off someone).
The constant negativity is taxing however.
well put. I think this season does prove emphatically that the roster is just bereft of talent. Even the guys that were alleged to have skills to elevate are not doing so, rather than elevating they're stagnating or playing pedestrian hockey.
The talent level of the players isn't the problem, it is the rigid system that they are forced to play in. Given that players produce before getting to UW and produce after playing at UW, but somehow at UW they are bereft of talent doesn't make any sense, nor the fact that even as the players change, the new players have the same low talent that the departing players did.
I don't know all of their pre-UW stats but off the top of my head I'm thinking of guys like littlex2, dahl, meuer, barnes, labate, lee (although this year he's put up more points than I'd expected), navin, woods. Navin I know had a ton of points prior to UW so I don't know what's up with him, but the rest? again, I don't recall their stats prior to college
in regard to the players being forced to play a rigid system I 100% agree. in Eaves' first season I remember someone coming on this board after a game against I think Maine, and stated that the UW players were skating like robots. I think they still do. they've been sapped of a lot of creativity from what I've been seeing.
10 years is about 6 years more than enough time to get your players here and create your atmosphere with the team and expectations and systems. For a while I thought, wait until Eaves can bring in the Parise's and the types he won Gold with @ WJC. as it turns out, those guys either don't want to play here (save Parise who actually would have) or Eaves is just whiffing on them.
****...it's going to be a loooooooong time before Dvorak and Malone are here and even then they'd better have a **** good supporting cast
Season before coming to UW:
Derek Lee 21-56-77 followed by 12-47-59 in the BCHL.
Jefferson Dahl 16-24-40 in 56 games USHL
Tyler Barnes 35-33-68 in 60 games USHL
Brendan Woods 14-12-26 in 56 games USHL
Joesph Labate came direct from MN HS (Burnsville IIRC) and Brad Navin Cam in drectly from WI HS, both would likely have benefited from some USHL seasoning for a season before attending UW.
Ryan Little was recruited as a Defenseman and only converted to a forward while at UW,
Sean Little and Kegan Meuer did not have great offensive numbers, but they are also not playing on the top 2 lines and were NEVER expected to.
I don't know where you think all of these Parise type players are hiding because their are zero top end guys that the staff isn't in contact with. With only 18 scholarships to go around between ~25 players I don't know how much better Eaves can do on the recruiting front, it isn't as if UW is being blown out on the recruiting front, they win as much as to be expected when they go head to head with the UND, UMN, UMI, DU, BU and BC for the top end players. To believe that UW will win every recruiting battle is as absurd as believing that UW will win every game.
Eaves recruited teams have never lacked for talent, experience and cohesion sure, but never talent. The issue has not been getting quality talent to campus with Eaves, but what happens to that talent once it is on campus.
The BTHC is going to have zero impact on recruiting going forward regardless of who the coach is, what conference UW in changes nothing for UW.
Does anyone know...according to this link the SCSU @ Wisconsin series is being played in phoenix on March 8 & 9....is this true??
http://events.azcentral.com/phoenix_az/events/hockey
Does anyone know...according to this link the SCSU @ Wisconsin series is being played in phoenix on March 8 & 9....is this true??
http://events.azcentral.com/phoenix_az/events/hockey
Are we seriously blaming Eaves for guys having their production at the D1 level less then what they produced in juniors or high school....AGAIN? We already had this conversation before and it is beyond retarded to expect production not to decrease at every step up the pyramid of hockey as you step up in weight class and are playing the next level.
Don't believe me? Here 4 guys point per game numbers:
Heatley 2.5 in AJHL, 1.46 at UW, & .99 at the NHL level
Toews 1.7 at Shattucks, 1.11 at North Dakota, .90 in the NHL
Kessel 2.35 with USDT-U18, 1.30 at Minny, .72 in the NHL
Crosby 2.8 at Shuttucks, 2.5 in QMJHL, and 1.4 in the NHL
Eaves problem is not systems, developmental, or any other malarchy you want to blame him for. His problem has been the roster is always short one (or more) of those guys that have that ability you can't teach in as much as you either have it or you don't. Whether it is not getting enough of the Kessel, Toews, or Heatleys of the world, or having them leave to soon....that is the real problem. It's not the X's and the O's, it's the Jimmy's and the Joe's.
Every players numbers will decrease as they move up in talent level, the issue is that point-per-game junior players come to UW and have their production completely fall off a cliff. While every program has players who can't adjust to the next level, it seems that Eaves has one of those players EVERY single season. Either the talent identification or the talent development or the overall system isn't working and in any case the responsibility is Eaves and Eaves alone as the head of the program.