Puck Swami
New member
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!
I agree with you. Wisconsin's D limited Denver to 23 shots on the night, many from the perimeter, which is usually enough for a victory in this league when your offense is averaging 4 goals per game. The Pioneers have some high-skill players, and the three Denver goals were all high-skill goals. Colborne's shot was an NHL-style PPG - a picked spot under the crossbar on the first one. Ostrow's goal was a nice tip in, and the final Denver goal by Maiani was a water bottle popper. Overall, UW outplayed Denver in all three periods, but Denver was better in the OT.
I don't think UW's d played all that poorly. They limited the # of DU shots nicely. I didn't see any clean odd man rushes where DU went from the redline in. UW could get out of their D zone easier than DU could. On the first DU goal, a UW forward went for the steal at the redline, allowing DU more space and skaters in the UW zone. Bad idea. I missed his #. The 2nd goal was great play by DU. There was a UW player with the goal scorer, that spin move was sweet. 3rd goal, UW was dead tired at the end of the Smith penalty and yes someone got crossed up and let the DU guy open. It was a great shot though. But in OT, the D zone coverage was BADDD. Overall I'd give the D zone play a B+ in regulation and an F in OT.
I agree with you. Wisconsin's D limited Denver to 23 shots on the night, many from the perimeter, which is usually enough for a victory in this league when your offense is averaging 4 goals per game. The Pioneers have some high-skill players, and the three Denver goals were all high-skill goals. Colborne's shot was an NHL-style PPG - a picked spot under the crossbar on the first one. Ostrow's goal was a nice tip in, and the final Denver goal by Maiani was a water bottle popper. Overall, UW outplayed Denver in all three periods, but Denver was better in the OT.