So any substance to the chatter on Mike Eaves to New Jersey and Mark Johnson rotating over to the Men's side?
Any word on who the leading candidates are to replace Tracy? Probably not a shortage of qualified and motivated applicants.
There is more than one type of experience. Most of those you've mentioned have 5 years of experience with Coach Johnson, and some like Vetter have more, so he'd already have a great idea for their leadership qualities and how they can execute an assigned task. I could see any of Duggan, Lawler, or Vetter being a very effective recruiter. Coach Miller won it all with Chu and Ouellette as assistants, proving that a volume of national team experience (and exposure) is valuable as well. Vetter would bring the added bonus of then having a full-time goalie coach. With such a hire, then Friessen probably assumes the #1 assistant role.Because Tracey was the #1 assistant I think you can all but rule out anyone that has never coached in college before. That rules out about half the names Ive heard floating around including Burish, Engstrom, Duggan, Lawler, Morris, Vetter, and Zaugg..as former Badgers. Burish, Vetter, and Zaugg-Siergiej have all coached locally and Morris at a number of preps including Shattuck so I wouldn't rule them out if this was a 2nd assistant position. However they are looking for a primary recruiter and it would be a stretch for any of these girls to assume that role.
I agree, especially because his program gives all indications of moving in the right direction for the long term. Given he already has coached under Johnson, there would figure to be little upside to such a switch unless he wanted out of Boston for personal reasons.I doubt Flint would want to go back to being in assistant considering he is building a program already..
There is more than one type of experience. Most of those you've mentioned have 5 years of experience with Coach Johnson, and some like Vetter have more, so he'd already have a great idea for their leadership qualities and how they can execute an assigned task. I could see any of Duggan, Lawler, or Vetter being a very effective recruiter. Coach Miller won it all with Chu and Ouellette as assistants, proving that a volume of national team experience (and exposure) is valuable as well. Vetter would bring the added bonus of then having a full-time goalie coach. With such a hire, then Friessen probably assumes the #1 assistant role.
How about Sis Paulsen? Not sure what she was doing the last year or so, but she was on the Bemidji staff for awhile. Also, would it be a move up professionally for Jackie MacMillan to go from head coaching at St. Scholastica to #1 assistant at Wisconsin? I'm guessing maybe not though I don't know.
That was my point about UMD in 2007-2008 when neither Chu nor Ouellette had much coaching experience. When the head coach has as much experience with the program as Miller then or Johnson now, that is far less of an issue than if the head coach is green as well. A good recruiter really only needs an eye for talent, good people skills, and a willingness to invest a lot of time. Beyond that, they are a mouthpiece for the head coach and are selling his program. From that respect, I'd rather have somebody who knows Johnson and his program well.Friesen herself only has a few seasons of coaching under her belt which would give Mark two under-experienced assistants should he chose to bring in one of the above.
Well...better luck with that endeavor in the future then.![]()
So any substance to the chatter on Mike Eaves to New Jersey and Mark Johnson rotating over to the Men's side?
I disagree with that. Johnson had the chance to take the Penn State mens' hockey coaching job and he turned it down. Mark Johnson loves Madison and I dont see him ever leaving the area.I only think he leaves the UW women for a new (away from UW) challenge, as Mark has stated on a number of occasions, he is happy where he is at now..
Luck isnt needed when it comes to things like that.Between the rodents and the Wild its not difficult to find fault with Minnesota hockey.
A lot more hockey in The State of Hockey than the Gophers and the Wild. How's that Wisconsin NHL franchise doing?Haven't heard much talk about the Wisconsin WWHL team lately either. I live on the Minnesota / Wisconsin border and have access to some televised Wisconsin high school hockey games. I'll be honest, compared to Minnesota high school hockey...it's kind of pathetic. If my goal was to take the condition of hockey in Badgerland down a peg or two I'd look at the bigger picture just as the term "Minnesota hockey" implies...and I'd have plenty of material.
You'd need to work a little harder in your goal to take The State of Hockey down a peg or two. Badger women's hockey NCAA titles alone ain't gonna get 'er done.![]()
Between the rodents and the Wild its not difficult to find fault with Minnesota hockey.
Between the rodents and the Wild its not difficult to find fault with Minnesota hockey.
Never been a fan of the Wild myself. I was a big North Star and NHL fan before Norm made them disappear. When the NHL returned to Minnesota, it looked like a very different game to me and I lost interest in the NHL altogether. Been to three Wild games. I prefered hockey games to rock concerts with a little hockey in between sets. It's still a good thing for the state and metro to have a pro franchise and having that is a plus for the undeniable hockey culture that does exist in the state. So I guess I can't concur that among the states in the union the "State of Hockey" moniker is total BS and of little / no significance. It may only have meaning to the relatively small segment of certified hockey nuts in the state...but that segment isn't really that small in Minnesota.I live in Minnesota and am a fan of Gopher women's hockey. I was a North Star fan but admit to never particularly warming to the new professional franchise. Are they ever going to make the playoffs?
I can't find very much to disagree with in GoBucky's jibe as long as the jibe is directed at men's hockey. I have always felt that the "State of Hockey" boast is a bunch of capital B capital S.
My own measuring stick is focused more on quality than quantity. Despite the participant numbers, Minnesota is not...never will be The State of Basketball. When I watch the State Tournament for each sport, boys and girls, to me there looks to be no comparison in quality of play. I think it's actually the players and teams at every level outside the realm of pro and college hockey that are the basis, foundation, heart and soul, bulk...or whatever you want to label it, of the hockey culture in the state.* So requiring better success from those higher visibility teams to justify The State of Hockey moniker just isn't a requirement for me.The pro team sucks. The Gopher men suck. As far as high school goes, the high school hockey, both boys and girls, is of a high quality but there just should not be any doubt that as to high schools, Minnesota is a basketball state. Check the number of hockey programs and number of participants, check the number of basketball programs and number of participants.
The state of hockey boast is pretty empty until such time as some higher quality hockey is played by the higher visibility teams.
UW hockey is an excellent division I hockey program both men and women. Great tradition. For some strange reason I never feel the urge to take 'em down a peg or two. I hope the Gophers can beat them soon. I would enjoy that. That would be quite satisfactory for me.The Division 1 women's hockey need bow down to NO ONE in terms of whether or not it qualifies as a state of hockey program. Gopher women's hockey is a consistent beacon of excellence in an otherwise fairly mediocre hockey landscape. That doesn't mean that I think Gopher women's hockey is superior to Badger women's hockey. I used to think that but do not think it now and will not think it again until the results of the games between the two teams begin to reflect such a shift in the scales. For now, I only say that Gopher women's hockey is excellent and need not apologize to anyone.
Amen to that. Most of the time when Minnesotans boast about their hockey its nothing but exaggeration and empty bragging.I have always felt that the "State of Hockey" boast is a bunch of capital B capital S.
The state of hockey boast is pretty empty until such time as some higher quality hockey is played by the higher visibility teams.
Anyone know who the player is that has been rumored to be transferring to Wisconsin?