What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Who is the competition?

Re: Who is the competition?

I am not speaking on behalf of USCHO, but my opinion is once a player is gone, they are gone. The main emphasis for USCHO looks to be how that affects their college hockey team and not the pro team they signed with. If contract information is made available, it is included. If not, I would assume that resources are not spent tracking it down as opposed to, you know, covering college hockey. You do often see mentions of a former player making the NHL team, but that is usually tracked by league correspondents and not the news wing of USCHO. I know I include any NHL deals in my AHA column because they are rare.
 
Last edited:
Re: Who is the competition?

Wait, you expect Oso to actually know what he's talking about? :p
This guy is complete non-entity, and has absolutely no ****ing clue what he is talking about.

Any Osorojo started thread should be focused on Nachos, they deserve nothing else.

Has anyone heard when the new NCAA Hockey Video game is coming out? :rolleyes:

Assuming you are correct: this thread is nonsense and I am a non-entity, how do you explain your motive for your long-after-the-fact avid reply? No matter. You join a long list of volunteer crusaders to define the "proper" topics to discuss about college hockey. e.g. - "Which back-up goalie will have the best won-lost record in 2013-14?"
 
Re: Who is the competition?

Assuming you are correct: this thread is nonsense and I am a non-entity, how do you explain your motive for your long-after-the-fact avid reply? No matter. You join a long list of volunteer crusaders to define the "proper" topics to discuss about college hockey. e.g. - "Which back-up goalie will have the best won-lost record in 2013-14?"
I don't regularly check the D1 boards, because it tends to attract most idiotic of all posters, of which you're example 1a or 1b.
 
Any Osorojo started thread should be focused on Nachos, they deserve nothing else.
What about ponies?
mlfw9280-1355678759230.gif
 
Re: Who is the competition?

I don't regularly check the D1 boards, because it tends to attract most idiotic of all posters, of which you're example 1a or 1b.

Since you "don't regularly check the D1 boards" most of your nearly twenty-six thousand posts must have been about DIII teams. You gotta be a real entity. Which backup DIII goalie will have the best won-lost record this year?
 
Re: Who is the competition?

Since you "don't regularly check the D1 boards" most of your nearly twenty-six thousand posts must have been about DIII teams. You gotta be a real entity. Which backup DIII goalie will have the best won-lost record this year?
You're pretty dim, aren't you? Also, like another poster in another thread already today, post count argument means you automatically lose. Have a ****ty day.
 
Re: Who is the competition?

Since you "don't regularly check the D1 boards" most of your nearly twenty-six thousand posts must have been about DIII teams. You gotta be a real entity. Which backup DIII goalie will have the best won-lost record this year?

Posters regularly discuss issues related to the sport that go beyond stats, winning percentages and league standings. Sometimes as stand alone threads, but often within season threads. However, you clearly are here to troll and come from a foundation that you do not appreciate NCAA hockey in any way, shape or form. Were you to posit a proposition that wasn't obviously intended to disparage a game at a site in which the majority of visitors covet at most or enjoy at least, you'd gain far more traction and buy-in. It's more than ok to ask questions - hell call out the emperor even - but your end game has never been resolution (either by fellow posters and certainly never by yourself) but rather a sly attempt to take potshots at the sport, its administrators, players and fans. That's about as diplomatic as I can be given what I really think about what you do here.
 
Back
Top