Re: Which teams advance to the Frozen Four in Minneapolis?
My 2 cents on this "whats good and whats not good for women's hockey" issue,
Well, I don't think an Eastern team beating the Gophers this year would be a good thing for Women's College hockey. The exposure that women's college hockey is going to get if they finish off the season with a perfect record will be ten times the amount of exposure a team that beat them will get. Someone will come up with some bs about how the Gophers supposedly played a weak schedule, and that was the only reason they went undefeated, and so then it won't even be that big of a deal that some Eastern team beat them. Or what if UND beats them first?! And what if then UND won the title?!
That would be saying that the WCHA was SOOO much better than the East that even their lowly 2nd place team that needed 6 tries to finally beat the Gophers, was still better than anything the East could produce.
Maybe I'm biased and just hoping, maybe this whole argument of mine is wishful thinking. Maybe I am deluded into thinking if I can convince you that its not a good thing for the Gophers to lose, that then they won't?! lol
But I see this as one of those stories, that if it plays out right for the Gophers, is the kind of story that even non-hockey fans will enjoy hearing about or reading about. The only people who will care if they get beat? Die hard eastern hockey fans, is my guess. Or at least a year from now that is all who will care.
I'm telling you, as an amateur historian of sports, no one remembers the teams that came up 1 short of the perfect season. But who do they remember?!
The UCLA Bruins of the 60's & 70's. The Miami Dolphins team that went undefeated. The guy who pitched the NO-hitter, not the one hitter. Who cares about that guy? I mean 20 years later.
Only bad things can come now from the Gophers losing, or at least for 90% of hockey fans. The 10% that are fans of the team that beats the Gophers or the conf mates who care more about the conf's rep than that their rival now has this glorious accomplishment that they will never have the opportunity to have, realistically, will be happy about it, but do the 10% mean more than the 90%?! The Gophers losing will go down as one of the biggest upsets ever in the history of sports, honestly. A huge portion of people, many who otherwise wouldn't care, will feel heartbreak if they lose.
I am sure people got tired of UCLA winning all of the time, but yet cbb's popularity grew by leaps and bounds during the period where not just the same conf, but the same team, won every single game, every single conf Title, and every single Natl Title, too. It was a huge story. Ten years after a season where parity ruled and some team who just got hot at the right time won the title, are not something you tell your grandkids about. But everyone knows about the UCLA Bruins and the Miami Dolphins.
Would they put the team that beat the Gophers on the cover of a Wheaties Box?! No. But would they think about putting the Gophers on the cover of that Wheaties Box if they win?! YEAH!!!!
Who would get the invite to be on the David Letterman show? Or Good Morning America?!
So whats better for the sport?!
Long term, next year's an Olympic year, it'll be a perfect opportunity for the East to finally take home the hardware. And I'm not suggesting that teams roll over and just let us have this title. But arguing that the Gophers winning the title would be bad for the sport??? Just doesn't make sense.