Re: What the Fark???
it could mean is that the whole (Indiana’s successful basketball program) was greater than the sum of its parts (i.e. few really great basketball players). Whatever you think of him as a person, the man could coach basketball. I don’t have Knight’s graduation rates on hand, but my understanding is that it was pretty high.
Hey, don't misunderstand me, I
loved watching Knight's Indiana teams play basketball. He's still the last NCAA Men's Division I coach to have a perfect season. His teams played basketball the way I love to see it played. Lots of talented role players playing at their best game after game after game.
At the same time, he also went beyond challenging his players to be the best they could be into outright bullying and abuse. The knock on Knight to which I was indirectly alluding was that he "burned out" his players during college so that they had nothing left after they graduated. Any discussion of Knight has to be nuanced and include the great and the vile at the same time.
Auriemma is very demanding, but never has he abused or bullied or physically assaulted his players. He reminds me very much of John Wooden, able both to recruit the best talent available and also to take that individual skill and meld it into a team-centric approach that makes the group even more effective as a unit than the sum of its individuals. Bill Walton may have been the most scintillating talent as a college player that I ever saw. Look how much better he was as part of those teams than he might have been elsewhere.
Funny that you mentioned Pat Summitt. She was truly a great figure in college basketball and a powerful figure for change and improvement. The graphic that ESPN showed at the end of the 2014 Women's championship was very fitting:
1. Wooden, Championship game record: 10 - 0
2. Auriemma, Championship game record: 9 - 0
3. Summitt, Championship game record: 8 - 5 (4 of the losses were to UConn).
Knight is very high on this list, he is in the top 6 or so I think.