Any idea of when we might have a schedule for next year?
I'm lookng for MAC domination in the CCHA.![]()
Any idea of when we might have a schedule for next year?
Any idea how they will handle the clusters next season with an odd number of teams? Will it get dropped?
The Big Ten teams will play each other 4 times each. All other teams will play four teams four time and six teams twice. The schedule is set to rotate over an eight year period so that all things will be equal in terms of number of times you play each school and how many times at home and away. The playoff format is likely to be decided this week in the meetings in Florida. My guess is that with no 12th team, that #5 will join 1-4 with first round byes and then you'll have 6 vs 11, 7 vs 10 and 8 vs 9 to fill the other three slots in the quarterfinals.
Except all things aren't equal. Unbalanced schedules end up being unfair in that regard, and especially so when teams are arbitrarily bunched up based on something that shouldn't matter in the middle of a CCHA race, like being in the Big Ten. It's one thing to play one school more than another one year, and then catch up to some other team the next. But an 8 year rotation? Not that it matters because the CCHA (and perhaps all of college hockey) may look very different in 8 years. I like this arrangement even less than the clusters with the permanent rivalry partner, and those were only a marginally acceptable schedule IMO.
It creates some hellish travel, but I would have preferred the old 11 team arrangement where everyone played 3 games against the other ten teams. The big drawback there is even fewer opportunities for inter-conference games, more of which being something college hockey needs to find a way to promote.
I do like the Big Ten basketball tournament mode idea of the post-season, though. Hopefully the CCHA considers it. Keeps us from re-visiting those horrible Super-Six days of playing games on Thursdays before friends and family sized crowds. Not that game one on Friday this March was much better than that.![]()
Travel and economics are good reasons to go against a play everyone 3 times schedule, along with the desire for non conference matchups. The three times each idea is a logistical nightmare. Would you want Northern Michigan to travel to Columbus for one game, then bus to Miami for a second, along with other similar scenarios? This would create an even greater home ice advantage for the home team that is home in bed while their opponent gets to travel 2-3 hours or more, go to the arena to drop equipment then by the time they get checked into their hotel its 3 or 4 in the morning, which then pretty much negates your morning pre game skate. It also necessitates the home arena have to have someone on duty when the visitor arrives in the wee hours of the morning.
My pick for the Broncos' new coach, Mark Osiecki, just got hired by Ohio State.
I knew he'd go somewhere.
There was a time, 20 years ago, when the students and the community all cheered together, we had a pep band like all the other schools, the team and the fans wore the school colors with pride like every other college, we went to to the Joe, we went to the NCAA regionals, we had a team to be proud of. Will those days return? Let us hope.
So, you can join me in RAGE when the new downtown arena finally gets shoved down our throats.
Excellent. I'll get the badges.