state of hockey
He fixes the cable?
Re: WCHA Final Five: Hello Empty Seats
Imagine an all-Minnesota F5. Good Lord. Even I would probably avoid it.
Imagine an all-Minnesota F5. Good Lord. Even I would probably avoid it.
Too bad they're aren't enough Minnesota teams...but hey, who's counting?Imagine an all-Minnesota F5. Good Lord. Even I would probably avoid it.
Too bad they're aren't enough Minnesota team...but hey, who's counting?
Minn
Minn st
St Cloud
Duluth
and of course Bemidji state
Minn
Minn st
St Cloud
Duluth
and of course Bemidji state
I think it offers unfair advantages to closer teams. The tournament should be permanently moved to Bratislava, Slovakia.People that don't like it being in St. Paul can never offer a credible alternative or how that alternative would work as well or better than the current arrangement. The simple fact of the matter is no other city can top it - much less match it - in terms of location and guaranteed money/attendance.
I think it offers unfair advantages to closer teams. The tournament should be permanently moved to Bratislava, Slovakia.
I think it offers unfair advantages to closer teams. The tournament should be permanently moved to Bratislava, Slovakia.
Too close to UAA.Where's the love for Vladivostok?
Cool, I could make it then! But actually Budapest would have more stuff to do around the arena.
People that don't like it being in St. Paul can never offer a credible alternative or how that alternative would work as well or better than the current arrangement. The simple fact of the matter is no other city can top it - much less match it - in terms of location and guaranteed money/attendance.
People who don't like it in St. Paul have, a) never been to it in St. Paul, and b) are suffering from some misguided notion that Minnesota has been afforded an advantage by having it played in St. Paul.
They don't realize that even though it's been played in St. Paul 17 times and Minneapolis twice, Minnesota has only managed to win the title 4 times there. Furthermore, they are 4-7 in the championship game, not exactly a stellar home ice advantage. Finally, the championship has been played elsewhere (Milwaukee) three times. Once Minnesota wasn't even in the tournament. The other two times they won it.
I thought it was twice (though I can't be sure until tonight when I can look at my pin collection) What are the 3 years? I know 1994. I think 1992 (again, have to look at my pins).
'98, I believe.
Maybe 94, 96, and 98 then. I'll look tonight.
Maybe we should move it back to Milwaukee then.Finally, the championship has been played elsewhere (Milwaukee) three times. Once Minnesota wasn't even in the tournament. The other two times they won it.
People who don't like it in St. Paul have, a) never been to it in St. Paul, and b) are suffering from some misguided notion that Minnesota has been afforded an advantage by having it played in St. Paul.
They don't realize that even though it's been played in St. Paul 17 times and Minneapolis twice, Minnesota has only managed to win the title 4 times there. Furthermore, they are 4-7 in the championship game, not exactly a stellar home ice advantage. Finally, the championship has been played elsewhere (Milwaukee) three times. Once Minnesota wasn't even in the tournament. The other two times they won it.