Six conference opponents x 2 home-and-home series = 24 league games. More OOC = greater diversity in the sport.
GFM
8 gives you 28 and no byes the last week of the season.
Six conference opponents x 2 home-and-home series = 24 league games. More OOC = greater diversity in the sport.
GFM
8 gives you 28 and no byes the last week of the season.
With a 28-game schedule not all teams play each other anyway. Why not drop the league schedule down to 24 or 26 games and ooen up dates for additional OOC games?
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
With a 28-game schedule not all teams play each other anyway. Why not drop the league schedule down to 24 or 26 games and ooen up dates for additional OOC games?
If you drop it that low, then you have to go with unbalanced scheduling, and I think that destroys league competition over time.
GFM
It's unbalanced to begin with. Why would it be any different?
it's late May and college hockey is four months out.
GMF
Twist the knife a bit more, Geof.
And they still won't. Which is why it will likely be:The problem the last time around was those teams didn't want to travel to the U.P.
And they still won't. Which is why it will likely be:
NCHC = As is - WMU - MIAMI + BSU + MSUM
CCHA = BGSU, WMU, MIAMI, FSU + pick four from AHA.
WCHA = UAA, UA_, UAH, MTU, NMU, LSSU, ASU
And they still won't. Which is why it will likely be:
NCHC = As is - WMU - MIAMI + BSU + MSUM
CCHA = BGSU, WMU, MIAMI, FSU + pick four from AHA.
WCHA = UAA, UA_, UAH, MTU, NMU, LSSU, ASU
No way MTU accepts being in that version of the WCHA.
And they still won't. Which is why it will likely be:
NCHC = As is - WMU - MIAMI + BSU + MSUM
CCHA = BGSU, WMU, MIAMI, FSU + pick four from AHA.
WCHA = UAA, UA_, UAH, MTU, NMU, LSSU, ASU
I don't see teams like Robert Morris, Niagara, Canisius breaking off from AHA anymore. AHA has put a multi-year plan in place to allow teams to get up to the fully funded 18 scholarship level, if they so choose.
Why do you consider that likely, and why do you think that there will be three fully-western leagues and not the two that currently exist?
GFM
And they still won't. Which is why it will likely be:
NCHC = As is - WMU - MIAMI + BSU + MSUM
CCHA = BGSU, WMU, MIAMI, FSU + pick four from AHA.
WCHA = UAA, UA_, UAH, MTU, NMU, LSSU, ASU
A couple of years ago I proposed that the league own/ lease an airplane that they could base in Minneapolis and would pick up the Alaska teams and ferry them to the city they were headed for and vice versa. In addition it could be used to fly some of the more far flung games to each other, such as UAH vs BSU. That way all the Alaska travel went thru one city which would save money on air fare. So for instance it picks up BGSU at home and in two hours they are in Minny and connecting or vice versa. If you always had one Alaska team at home and one on the road it would work pretty well.If BSU joined the NCHC, they would be destroyed year in and year out. Even if they were playing their MN/ND geographic rivals, they don't have the resources to compete long term. (No offense BSU fans.) On one of the Tech hockey pre-game interviews BSU was playing up the similarities between Tech and BSU. For me, I like similar schools playing each other.
I'm not so sure FSU would join that league. It could be just me, but when I was in MI, Western and Ferris was no Central v Western or Tech v Northern. As stated, I think there is no chance 1 let alone 4 AHA schools switch. The Lake Erie Basin (with the exception of Western NY and BGSU) is a D1 college hockey wasteland. If Miami and BGSU could convince Akron and Kent State to go D1 AND the money is better, then there might be a chance of pulling an AHA school or two.
I see no way the proposed WCHA survives. Travel costs would kill the league. Those are not big money schools. IMO ASU would cease D1 operations before they would join a league like that. I think ASU sees it as NCHC or bust.
College hockey, west of Buffalo will always be spread out with hard to get to places. Give it a few years and the NCHC is going to complain about going to Miami and CC. If Denver and North Dakota hit a few down years financially or they are trying to keep up with/stay ahead of MN/BC/BU they will turn on Miami and CC and having to "share" their winnings with them. No one will ever be happy.
Excluding Alaska, the B1G, and AFA.
Everything west of Michigan is WCHA 3.0
Everything east of Wisconsin in CCHA 2.0
On UA school to WCHA & the other to CCHA.