Russell Jaslow
Registered User
Never implied that.
I know.
IIRC, they were a pretty crappy D-3 program as well.
So true.
Never implied that.
IIRC, they were a pretty crappy D-3 program as well.
And as far as it being the TBT, half the crowd leaves after the toys fly anyway.
Utica has the greatest Teddy Bear toss anywhere. I was blown away when I went last year. You have to experience it in person to fully appreciate it.
Well UU beat Stonehill by a larger margin than #16 ASU. Does that mean UU could be ranked at least #15 in D1 were they to make the jump right now?!?!
*heavy sarcasm*
I will all but guarantee that it will be treated as a normal game with their top lineup. It is their teddy bear toss game. I would be absolutely shocked if Landsberger played.
Your idiocy level knows no bounds.
You wrote: "Kinda repeating myself (and I tend to do that), but some of these better UCHC wins won't hurt UU's PWR ranking at all..."
Both Prez and I pointed out the fallacy of that comment.
Who needs the English lessons?
The better UCHC teams might do fairly well OOC, and thus help UU's PWR, should UU beat them in conference play.
That's what I implied in the first place, you angry (and perhaps drunken) dope. It really wasn't so difficult to figure out.
XO.
Not so much.
The better UCHC teams might do fairly well OOC, and thus help UU's PWR, should UU beat them in conference play.
That's what I implied in the first place.
I was surprised they played 5 lines. It was Roberts game until everyone realized that Stonehill was bad. I think everyone in the arena expected a little more from a D1 team.
Assuming they're not giving scholarships ...Basically, they are a joke.
I kind of implied that in an earlier post. Stonehill is not a D1 team. Heck, last year midway, they removed all game results against Stonehill from the D1 PWR when the powers that be realized Stonehill was not a D1 team (and I suspect they will do that again this year). They can call themselves whatever they want, but until they actually act like a D1 team, they need to stop pretending.
Fishman many times pounds on the idea that Utica going D1 will accomplish nothing if they are just a middling D1 team in a middling D1 conference. Well, Stonehill takes that to another (low) level. They are a D3 team calling themselves a D1 team without recruiting D1 players, without playing a complete D1 schedule, without even being in any kind of D1 conference or acting like a proper D1 independent like ASU, Lindenwood, Augustana, and LIU do.
Basically, they are a joke.
Assuming they're not giving scholarships ...
30 players @ $53,000/year = Pretty astute business model
Utica isn't in the same boat as far the above, but I still can't figure out why they'd go D-1.
They are not going D1 and the school is not going D2. Mark my words.
They are not going D1 and the school is not going D2. Mark my words.
Here I was thinking you had sources. I can promise that you are wrong.
Oh, I have plenty of sources. And people know who I am and thus know the type of sources I can acquire over the past 30 years.
Nobody knows who you are or the possible sources you could acquire.
I've been quite aggressive this year checking my sources, because admittedly this is a subject I haven't bothered getting personally involved in. Until now, because I was getting tired of this constant never ending story that one day, you watch, Utica is going D1. There is not a single source of mine, not ONE, who believes Utica is going D1, and they all cite solid reasons why.
I am now 95% convinced Utica is not going D1. (Always got to leave open a possibility there, LOL.)
That's fine you don't need to believe me but I'm not the only one hearing it. Pioneer has heard much of the same probably from similar sources that are airtight to the endeavor. Not to discredit your sources but if they truly had any skin here they would know what is happening behind the scenes.