No I'm definitely on board with us having a really good shot this year... I'm optimistic about next year too (we really only lose Kent and Miano, and get back Keller and Flanagan), but yeah, this year could definitely be the year.Grant may not see it this way, but this might be BC's best shot to win a title.
That's what I meant -- I don't like BC's chances next season. Is Burt on the 5-year plan, or why aren't you counting her in the losses? If she is, then I don't like your chances this year so well.I'm optimistic about next year too (we really only lose Kent and Miano, and get back Keller and Flanagan)...
.
Brian Idalski's opinion was that the number of elite players in the game was shrinking, not expanding...
Grant may not see it this way, but this might be BC's best shot to win a title.
pretty much explains why his program only had one NCAA appearance, couldn't see the trees through the forest
As much as I hate to admit it, I actually agree with you on this one. He never struck me as the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Maybe the dimmer switch was just always on a low setting. He always came across as being very supercilious.
your disdain for male coaches is well known
maybe if you had said he had a number of very good players that never reached their full potential while playing for him .... I'd mention a few but you could pretty much list every player who ever played for him except for Shelby Amsley-Benzie, who being a goalie I'm not even sure you could give him credit for her
he always struck me as a coach who didn't see the difference between men's and women's hockey
your post while amusing ...
excuse me while I flush
Until I see the second coming of Cayley Mercer and Genevieve Bannon from two of the returnees or freshmen
1) Wisconsin
2) Minnesota
3) Clarkson Early season Clarkson/Northeastern and Clarkson/Bemidji series will be a good indicator of this team's strengths/weaknesses
4) Boston College
5) Colgate
6) Northeastern
7) St. Lawrence
8) UMD
9) Cornell
10) Robert Morris
1 UW
2 Clarkson
3 BC
4 St. L
5 Merrimack
6 UM
7 OSU
8 Mercyhurst
9 Q
10 UMD
I'll address this question in a week or two lol... Don't let me forget!That's what I meant -- I don't like BC's chances next season. Is Burt on the 5-year plan, or why aren't you counting her in the losses? If she is, then I don't like your chances this year so well.
I don't know a lot about Idalski; but I do know that his teams scared the heck out of the Gophers every year. His teams were in the top 4 nationally for several years earlier in this decade, but with the NCAA choosing cost savings over bracket integrity, they always had to go through the Gophers to get to the Final Four. That would be a difficult accomplishment even for a humble coach.Actually I have disdain for any coach whose arrogance overshadows their ability to do their job well enough to gain proper respectability. The fact of the matter is there are simply far more in that category that are males. I don't judge by gender.....however, I also don't expect you to understand.
You aught to wipe before you get off your well deserved seat of honor, and please wash your hands for once.
Since Quinny lost to Maine and you have Quinny in 9th, is your 6th place the University of Maine??? Just wonderin![]()
I don't know a lot about Idalski; but I do know that his teams scared the heck out of the Gophers every year.
I don't know a lot about Idalski; but I do know that his teams scared the heck out of the Gophers every year.
They Gophers were scared of them because Idalski's teams were dirty, two players in particular, and he didn't do anything about it, so the Gophers might have feared getting injured unnecessarily. The Gophers were not scared about the possibility of losing to them. He was not a class act by any means.
This weeks top ten inspiration (credit to ARM) is "You might be a WCH contender if..."
...
2. Clarkson - For no other reason than you're the defending champions (and you stash players at your sister campus in Omaha)...
.