Re: USA Hockey National Championships
I think Minnesota is a unique situation. The state principal's association has the "no outside team" rule, meaning players cannot play for a high school and a travel team during the high school season. That works for Minnesota because the state has a sizeable population of female hockey players which means high school games can be competitive. But more importantly, it keeps things sane. Minnesota kids can focus on high school hockey, and then play competitive travel hockey in shoulder and summer seasons.
I'd be happy to have my daughter participate in the Minnesota model. Less windshield time, more ice time.
But that model can't work in other states. No other state has the population to field competitive public high school hockey teams. So players are forced to play on these travel teams during the high school hockey season.
If USA Hockey was thinking about the future, they'd move their entire season out of winter. It would go from Memorial Day to Labor Day. That way kids could go to and play for their public schools AND play competitive hockey in the summer, JUST LIKE MINNESOTA.
The female hockey world has changed a lot in 20 years. There were very few states with high school hockey. Today there are many that have it. Frankly, the only thing holding back high school hockey for girls is USA Hockey. Lots of kids leave their public schools for "hockey high schools" and prep schools and strip their states of talent. Move USA Hockey to the summer, and we'd have strong high school hockey, which in turn makes hockey stronger, which makes USA Hockey stronger, and so on and so on...
But that makes too much sense.
Back to original question, will the Minny HS school kids do this if they had travel. There are so many local opportunities available to them and most have them have played out East over the course of their minor careers. With 56 D1 commits on the 5 local teams not sure how many would travel while school is in session.
I think Minnesota is a unique situation. The state principal's association has the "no outside team" rule, meaning players cannot play for a high school and a travel team during the high school season. That works for Minnesota because the state has a sizeable population of female hockey players which means high school games can be competitive. But more importantly, it keeps things sane. Minnesota kids can focus on high school hockey, and then play competitive travel hockey in shoulder and summer seasons.
I'd be happy to have my daughter participate in the Minnesota model. Less windshield time, more ice time.
But that model can't work in other states. No other state has the population to field competitive public high school hockey teams. So players are forced to play on these travel teams during the high school hockey season.
If USA Hockey was thinking about the future, they'd move their entire season out of winter. It would go from Memorial Day to Labor Day. That way kids could go to and play for their public schools AND play competitive hockey in the summer, JUST LIKE MINNESOTA.
The female hockey world has changed a lot in 20 years. There were very few states with high school hockey. Today there are many that have it. Frankly, the only thing holding back high school hockey for girls is USA Hockey. Lots of kids leave their public schools for "hockey high schools" and prep schools and strip their states of talent. Move USA Hockey to the summer, and we'd have strong high school hockey, which in turn makes hockey stronger, which makes USA Hockey stronger, and so on and so on...
But that makes too much sense.
Last edited: