Well, it likely will have eligible players from this year's team and come late July we will know the rest.
The U-18 team members that still are eligible for the 2013-2014 team include on defense: Rolfes, Baldwin, and Dunne--all 3 very strong in both ends of the ice. And forwards: Laing, Kent, Rodgers, Cianfarano, Wellhausen, and Zarzecki. These last 3 played together as a line for most of the tournament and put up some very good offensive numbers. Zarzecki -7 points, Wellhausen -6 points and Cianfarano -6 points. All in all this entire group is a great core to build around for the next U-18 World Championships--whoever the coach may be!!
So looks like they'll need around 4 defensemen...7 forwards and 2 goalies? Looks like there are some big slots to fill!
Don't assume they will all be back. At least 2 of the eligible D from the 2012 team didn't make the 2013 team and I believe 2 of the forwards as well. Politics, who the coach is, and performance matters. For instance, Rachlin (D) had committed to Harvard (I have heard over Princeton) after the 2012 team - not too suprisingly, the 2013 coach (from Princeton) decided not to select her. It's possible she didn't earn a slot, but the coincidence is noticeable.
So you're saying in order to make the U18 National Team you would of been told in the previous years camps (15's and 16's)?
If so, what if a player significantly improves between these times?
2013-14 U18Any news on who the coaches will be yet?
2013-14 U18
HC: Jeff Kampersal
AC: Courtney Kennedy
AC: Katie Lachapelle
http://www.usahockey.com/TeamUSA/Womens/U18/KampersalCoach.aspx
Twenty years is "little experience?" Over the years, he's coached many goalies who went on to play D-I and is well regarded as a goaltender coach. People complain if there isn't a goalie coach included, but I guess you can still find somebody to complain if one is.Still don't understand how or why the high school coach with little experience was selected last time.
I just did some quick research - said person has been the head girls high school coach for 11 years. In that time, his teams have gone to exactly ZERO State Tournaments. In that same period, exactly TWO goalies (Kim Hanlon - 2005, Ashley Nixon - 2007) have gone onto play D1 hockey.Twenty years is "little experience?" Over the years, he's coached many goalies who went on to play D-I and is well regarded as a goaltender coach. People complain if there isn't a goalie coach included, but I guess you can still find somebody to complain if one is.
We're not talking about being a head coach, but being a goaltending coach. He also coached an All-American in Jody Horak and another D-I goalie in Katie Beauduy. That's a lot of D-I goalies from a basic high school, not a prep school or a club team that recruits talent. So for coaching goalies, which is what he was doing, he obviously had more coaching longevity at 20 years than either Kennedy or Lachapelle. If you wish to continue to maintain that makes him inexperienced, go ahead, but then a long list of coaches will also qualify as inexperienced. Or perhaps you think a coach needs college experience to coach high-school age goaltenders? BTW, I can read just fine, so you don't have to keep resorting to all caps. Don't have any inside knowledge as to why a change was made or whose decision it was, so unlike you, I won't try to jump to any conclusions about being prudent.I just did some quick research - said person has been the head girls high school coach for 11 years. In that time, his teams have gone to exactly ZERO State Tournaments. In that same period, exactly TWO goalies (Kim Hanlon - 2005, Ashley Nixon - 2007) have gone onto play D1 hockey.