What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy 3.0: We're The Mets of International Diplomacy

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it's partly because DOS simply had their own foreign policy while the howler monkeys were defecating in the White House. I guarantee as soon as the Republican politicals left the room, the DOS careers would turn to their international peers and side eye whatever "INORITE" is in French or German. That is certainly the way it was in defense and the IC.

Conservatives are okay for a laugh on teevee, and their daughters do their low-self-esteem best on the pole (and, after, on the pole), but you wouldn't allow them access to actual governance, that would be insane.

Don't disagree. But I thought I read that they saw a huge exodus from the career diplomats, et. al. during the reign of terror. There are any number of articles that say even in the first year it was north of 10-12% of the total workforce.

Actually, I took a look and it appears almost all of the attrition was in civil service. Based on #s from State, it looks like we're finally back to 12/31/16 #s for CS employees. Foreign service didn't really tank like CS. Wondering if that's because most of the FS positions are tied to foreign posts at embassies, which aren't really created or removed. No idea.
 
Don't disagree. But I thought I read that they saw a huge exodus from the career diplomats, et. al. during the reign of terror. There are any number of articles that say even in the first year it was north of 10-12% of the total workforce.

Actually, I took a look and it appears almost all of the attrition was in civil service. Based on #s from State, it looks like we're finally back to 12/31/16 #s for CS employees. Foreign service didn't really tank like CS. Wondering if that's because most of the FS positions are tied to foreign posts at embassies, which aren't really created or removed. No idea.

TBH I think a lot of that was really old folks who said "I'm not going to deal with this Nazi garbage for the next 4-8 years, I have a house on the Vineyard." I didn't say this but it's not the worst thing in the world that they left.

This happens in government a lot. When the Dems are in charge our best stay because they have sane leadership which stays out of their way and lets them ply their trade as SMEs. When the Nazis come, the ones who can escape do, rather than waste their time working for a fascist regime. If the Dems were always in charge the work would be too intellectually and morally fulfilling to leave.
 
TBH I think a lot of that was really old folks who said "I'm not going to deal with this Nazi garbage for the next 4-8 years, I have a house on the Vineyard." I didn't say this but it's not the worst thing in the world that they left.

This happens in government a lot. When the Dems are in charge our best stay because they have sane leadership which stays out of their way and lets them ply their trade as SMEs. When the Nazis come, the ones who can escape do, rather than waste their time working for a fascist regime. If the Dems were always in charge the work would be too intellectually and morally fulfilling to.

My brother spent the last 12 or so years of his career in the foreign service, the last 3 in administration in DC. When Dubya was elected for a second time, he was in the Delhi embassy and described how low the morale became among long time FS professionals, not only because diplomacy had been abandoned but also because the American people stood for it. A lot of people got out at that point, I guess. He expressed regret that a lot of these people had served under both R and D administrations and had a lot of experience and skill to bring to the table but just did not want to be part of it any longer.
 
Poots now has three choices:

1. He can stand down after all his bluster and look like a craven fool, or
2. He can invade and risk a decent chance of embarrassing The Bear on the world stage, or
3. He has to backchannel a proposal to NATO that both sides figure out how to walk away in a manner that they can each issue press releases declaring victory

Or he can keep doing what he's been doing, but just never take that ultimate step. Keep up the rhetoric, the badmouthing of the West, the act for the benefit of his people.
 
Or he can keep doing what he's been doing, but just never take that ultimate step. Keep up the rhetoric, the badmouthing of the West, the act for the benefit of his people.

What DPRK has been doing for 50 years.
 
Huh. Four of the Ukrainians who potentially could be used to install a pro-Kremlin government in the Ukraine worked closely with Paul Manifort.

You may remember him as President Trump's former campaign manager....

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/22/world/europe/ukraine-russia-coup-britain.html

Are you implying they’re very patriotic?

So the US is officially going to move embassy personnel and their families out of Kyiv and apparently Biden is considering sending planes and soldiers into Eastern Europe. What would we send? A-10’s and F-15’s? I would think we probably wouldn’t send F-22’s or any heavy bombers.
 
Are you implying they’re very patriotic?
If you mean could everyone mentioned in that article finish the chorus of:

Slav'sya, Otechestvo nashe svobodnoye,
Bratskikh narodov soyuz vekovoy, ...

.
.. then yes, very patriotic. They bleed white, blue, and red.
 
So the US is officially going to move embassy personnel and their families out of Kyiv and apparently Biden is considering sending planes and soldiers into Eastern Europe. What would we send? A-10's and F-15's? I would think we probably wouldn't send F-22's or any heavy bombers.

Fighter jets, AA ground units, anti-tank units. And sign a treaty with Ukraine allowing us to put bases in the country.

Let Putin know whenever he threatens a neighbor he just gave us a jump-off point there.
 
https://twitter.com/brikeilarcnn/sta...FK0ColzvA&s=19

"Vladimir Putin is not someone who should be admired." Lt. Col. @AVindman on former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo praising Vladimir Putin and the Trump administration's handling of Russia. https://t.co/wl0fAJhhUn

https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1485331400748408838?t=VnYcVCgTymVdVsZmVAUPiQ&s=19

“Our military has become the woke military, not the lethal military.” — Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) https://t.co/Js6rVW9S6P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top