What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kepler said:
1. OHMSS
2. FRWL
3. Goldfinger

Then we can talk.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm

For as bad as Timothy Dalton was, the 2 female leads in license are top notch.
Kep doesn’t have a thing for klempt in frwl? Does he :)

You really want a bond in Northern Ireland? Don’t you?
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Oh, and we can’t not mention chu mi :D
And the girls in bottoms up!

Golden gun gets props too then
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

mookie1995 said:
Hmmmm

For as bad as Timothy Dalton was, the 2 female leads in license are top notch.
Kep doesn’t have a thing for klempt in frwl? Does he :)

You really want a bond in Northern Ireland? Don’t you?
Click to expand...

I want Bond to ski, not swim. I want Bond to be a sociopath, not sympathetic and certainly not sensitive. I want Judi Dench to never have had anything to do with M. I will tolerate the current wonderboy Q.

My only other requirement for Bond is that he or she be Oxbridge and sexually predatory. I want Bond to be magnetic but not pleasant; suave but not comfortable. Bond is a weapon, not a human being.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

It's why Craig is the best bond series.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Kepler said:
The first 2/3 of the first Craig Bond was brilliant. Since then it's been a quick slide into crapola.
Click to expand...

Yeah. I still like ****ty Craig over decent anyone else though
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Gotta side with Kepler.
1t) Connery (minus Diamonds Are Forever)
1t) Lazenby
1t) Craig
4t) Brosnan
4t) Dalton
6) Connery (Diamonds Are Forever)
7) Barry Nelson
8) David Niven
9) Moore

Never Say Never Again doesnt exist.

Has anyone else seen the Hulu documentary of Lazenby? What a life that man lead.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Craig






Brosnan



The others.


Honestly, I really don’t care for any of the others. And I probably only like Brosnan for Goldeneye and he hundreds of hours we spent playing that game as kids.
 
dxmnkd316 said:
Craig






Brosnan



The others.


Honestly, I really don’t care for any of the others. And I probably only like Brosnan for Goldeneye and he hundreds of hours we spent playing that game as kids.
Click to expand...

Then you don't like Bond. Goldfinger, From Russia With Love and Dr. No >>>>>>>>> than everything Brosnan did. (His movies were awful outside GoldenEye). Craig made 1.5 good movies.

Brosnan is Roger Moore with better action scenes.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Sidney Reilly is better than any Bond - and he did it in real life.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Kepler said:
I want Bond to ski, not swim. I want Bond to be a sociopath, not sympathetic and certainly not sensitive. I want Judi Dench to never have had anything to do with M. I will tolerate the current wonderboy Q.

My only other requirement for Bond is that he or she be Oxbridge and sexually predatory. I want Bond to be magnetic but not pleasant; suave but not comfortable. Bond is a weapon, not a human being.
Click to expand...

he is English (so probably a traitor commie and a homo).

plus there are all the gadgets that don't exist.

they just need to continue having plots and stop trying to rewrite the old bonds. remakes are stupid (except of course for the new die hard with the rock :) )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top