What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Connery sucked

I’m with Kep. That bond is horrible. Bond is a weapon.

This is interesting, because Connery is my favorite Bond. He is a weapon. The Bond of Dr. No, From Russia with Love, and Diamonds are Forever is Lemarchand's box.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

This is interesting, because Connery is my favorite Bond. He is a weapon. The Bond of Dr. No, From Russia with Love, and Diamonds are Forever is Lemarchand's box.

Maybe I need to revisit it then. But part of that is my genderal preference for newer movies.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Then you don't like Bond. Goldfinger, From Russia With Love and Dr. No >>>>>>>>> than everything Brosnan did. (His movies were awful outside GoldenEye). Craig made 1.5 good movies.

Brosnan is Roger Moore with better action scenes.

I think you should read what I said about Brosnan a little closer ;)
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

I think you should read what I said about Brosnan a little closer ;)

I did...you still had him above everyone else outside of Craig which should be a high crime :)
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Mookie likes Craig. He's been doing the best he can with crappy scripts

This was true of Dalton too, with the added problem that Dalton was miscast. It would be like Pee Wee Herman as Bond: he's great at what he does, but god it's not that.

Rex Harrison was considered for Bond. That has to be the worst idea I have ever heard, and that includes Ronald Reagan as Rick.

The last 2.3 Bonds have been inane. The "Bond in Love" act at the end of Casino is the worst protracted period of Bond ever, particularly jarring since the first two-thirds was the best Bond since Connery's first run. Quantum was garden variety bad Bond, in the style of, say, Moonraker. And then Skyfall was a heaping pile of sentimental excrement from end to end in a way that no other Bond movie has ever been (Never Say Never Again is the only one that was close).

Craig is so compromised now by terrible character development decisions that he might flub even with the best script possible. His fourth will just be a placeholder to the next Bond, and they better have somebody spectacular to rescue the franchise from turning into British Mission Impossible. I'm rooting for Idris Elba just to watch knuck heads asplode. Even better would be Penélope Cruz bedding Russian agents two at a time like cocktail waitresses. Not just a Latina and not just a 45-year old Latina but a 45-year old Latina strumpet. Put her in a BLM shirt and unleash her on the Dumpies.
 
Last edited:
This was true of Dalton too, with the added problem that Dalton was miscast. It would be like Pee Wee Herman as Bond: he's great at what he does, but god it's not that.

Rex Harrison was considered for Bond. That has to be the worst idea I have ever heard, and that includes Ronald Reagan as Rick.

Dalton has bad hair
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Dalton has bad hair

Not in Lion in Winter he didn't.

<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c0/13/ec/c013ec930866c0021506747808ed4208.jpg" />


Mama likey. (So did Anthony Hopkins.)
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

He was wearing a helmet in his bond roles!!
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Mookie likes Craig. He's been doing the best he can with crappy scripts

I dont mind Craig...but Brosnan was awful. It was a decade too late. Hell he looked like it physically hurt him to kiss a girl half the time.
 
Last edited:
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

It's almost like there is a need for a Movie thread...
 
This was true of Dalton too, with the added problem that Dalton was miscast. It would be like Pee Wee Herman as Bond: he's great at what he does, but god it's not that.

Rex Harrison was considered for Bond. That has to be the worst idea I have ever heard, and that includes Ronald Reagan as Rick.

The last 2.3 Bonds have been inane. The "Bond in Love" act at the end of Casino is the worst protracted period of Bond ever, particularly jarring since the first two-thirds was the best Bond since Connery's first run. Quantum was garden variety bad Bond, in the style of, say, Moonraker. And then Skyfall was a heaping pile of sentimental excrement from end to end in a way that no other Bond movie has ever been (Never Say Never Again is the only one that was close).

Craig is so compromised now by terrible character development decisions that he might flub even with the best script possible. His fourth will just be a placeholder to the next Bond, and they better have somebody spectacular to rescue the franchise from turning into British Mission Impossible. I'm rooting for Idris Elba just to watch knuck heads asplode. Even better would be Penélope Cruz bedding Russian agents two at a time like cocktail waitresses. Not just a Latina and not just a 45-year old Latina but a 45-year old Latina strumpet. Put her in a BLM shirt and unleash her on the Dumpies.

First off, Craig has had his fourth already with Spectre.

Skyfall was great. Casino Royale was also great, but would've been better had it ended with him turning in his resignation and saving the Venice scene for the precredits intro to Quantum.

Quantum sucked because it was a Bourne movie with Bond's name slapped on it.

Also as I've said before, Brosnan was a great Bond stuck with bad scripts outside of GoldenEye. Tomorrow Never Dies has aged better than almost any other Bond movie, however.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

and AVTAK is watchable only because of walken

The blonde girl and her screams make her THE most annoying Bond girl in history
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top