What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

jimmy donald carter called off the mission while planes were in the air :eek:
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Lot of officials speculating today Trump called off the Iran strike literally while watching Tucker Carlson.</p>— Josh Rogin (@joshrogin) <a href="https://twitter.com/joshrogin/status/1142073041633054720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 21, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Yeah I feel like erdogan May not sit back silently here
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

If there's a Pulitzer for pairing headline & photo, this is my nomination.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

https://thegrayzone.com/2019/06/24/new-york-times-media-us-government-approval/

Not sure where else to put this. It’s inexcusable and confirms what i’ve Been reading in books by John Allen Stern, Joely Whitney and Hugh Wilford.

In another country we’d label this government propaganda. Here, in the land of the free we ignore msm confirming they can print stories or have their stories edited by cia or pentagon under the illusion or delusion that the press is still free.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A statement by the President: <a href="https://t.co/lLkjPg720D">pic.twitter.com/lLkjPg720D</a></p>— Real Press Sec. (@RealPressSecBot) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealPressSecBot/status/1143530876061405184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


So... over/under on when he nukes Iran turning the nation into Foxconn and Corning's largest glass factories?? Before or after the G20 meetings?
 
Last edited:
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

https://thegrayzone.com/2019/06/24/new-york-times-media-us-government-approval/

Not sure where else to put this. It’s inexcusable and confirms what i’ve Been reading in books by John Allen Stern, Joely Whitney and Hugh Wilford.

In another country we’d label this government propaganda. Here, in the land of the free we ignore msm confirming they can print stories or have their stories edited by cia or pentagon under the illusion or delusion that the press is still free.


You know I'm a fellow traveler with you, solo, but this is likely an overreaction. It's ordinary practice for media which have military and intelligence scoops to give the USG an opportunity to demonstrate that soldiers, operations, sources, and methods could be compromised. It doesn't necessarily mean shenanigans. You don't want a news story to get people killed. You don't want a news story to f-ck up a legitimate exercise of government's role in defense against genuine bad actors. So you ask them. You weigh their answer in deciding whether to publish.

I'll bet WaPo informed the Justice Department that it had the Watergate scoop, if nothing else by backchannel. If the government lies to you or tries to BS or intimidate you then you publish anyway. That's good journalism.
 
Last edited:
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A statement by the President: <a href="https://t.co/lLkjPg720D">pic.twitter.com/lLkjPg720D</a></p>— Real Press Sec. (@RealPressSecBot) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealPressSecBot/status/1143530876061405184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Obama and Kerry. ****ing *******.
 
You know I'm a fellow traveler with you, solo, but this is likely an overreaction. It's ordinary practice for media which have military and intelligence scoops to give the USG an opportunity to demonstrate that soldiers, operations, sources, and methods could be compromised. It doesn't necessarily mean shenanigans. You don't want a news story to get people killed. You don't want a news story to f-ck up a legitimate exercise of government's role in defense against genuine bad actors. So you ask them. You weigh their answer in deciding whether to publish.

I'll bet WaPo informed the Justice Department that it had the Watergate scoop, if nothing else by backchannel. If the government lies to you or tries to BS or intimidate you then you publish anyway. That's good journalism.

You’re right on all counts. I’m probably overreacting on this one.

the books i’m Reading have made me overly sensitive to these issues and instead of taking a step back and pondering a 360 view i’m A bit more Sonny from Godfather about it🤣

Time to put on some Howlin’ Wolf and relax😀
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A statement by the President: <a href="https://t.co/lLkjPg720D">pic.twitter.com/lLkjPg720D</a></p>— Real Press Sec. (@RealPressSecBot) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealPressSecBot/status/1143530876061405184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


So... over/under on when he nukes Iran turning the nation into Foxconn and Corning's largest glass factories?? Before or after the G20 meetings?

I'll take the way under. He'll huff and puff and threaten to blow the house down. Then we'll get a shart.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A statement by the President: <a href="https://t.co/lLkjPg720D">pic.twitter.com/lLkjPg720D</a></p>— Real Press Sec. (@RealPressSecBot) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealPressSecBot/status/1143530876061405184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


So... over/under on when he nukes Iran turning the nation into Foxconn and Corning's largest glass factories?? Before or after the G20 meetings?

That can't be real. Right?
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

That can't be real. Right?

It's a joke account.

Real Press Sec.
@RealPressSecBot

A bot transforms POTUS tweets into the proper Presidential statement format. A human posts satirical or hilariously spammy ads. Contact my owner @russelneiss
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top