Re: University of North Dakota Hockey: 2011-2012
NCAA sanctions could have been avoided if the ND legislature wouldn't have passed the "Bonehead" bill, making a timely and systematic retiring of the nickname virtually impossible for UND. Now the procedure is such that before the ND legislature can officially proceed with proper due process within the House and Senate to repeal the law, NCAA sanctions MUST be imposed first. So UND is screwed...by their own state government. Blame Carlson as the collossal airhead who somehow convinced other airheads in the State House and Senate, not to mention the honorable Governor that this bill would change the NCAA's mind.
What is most unfortunate in this unbelievable legal catastrophe, and what apparently the UND biased cohort of your ND elected officials did not comprehend, is by enacting the "Bonehead" bill, they have now essentially catalyzed an extremely volatile and racially divisive controversy within ND borders at the grassroots level between NA and non-NA. I certainly hope I'm wrong here, but it seems inevitable that racial slurs, discrimination and violence against Native Americans may escalate and turn ugly over the next few months. This will not fair well with both the State of ND and UND's reputation for a season.
Just being silly again Harley.
How exactly has the legislature "screwed" UND?
This is going down exactly as I predicted to you in the Notre Dame thread. The NCAA declined to change their mind and the North Dakota officials announced they will repeal the law. That will happen in November and we'll be right back to where we were after the original case was settled.
The "sanctions" you refer to are the inability to use or display the nickname or logo during NCAA tournament events.
So, between now and November exactly what events will those be? And even if we can't display them, we're now "screwed"? You think UND hasn't made plans to have generic "UND" or "North Dakota" athletic wear available for it's athletes?
See, the sanctions in this case have also always been the result: Can't use the name or logo. Now, if the NCAA had said you have to retire the name by August 15 or you face a two year ban on tournament participation, lose scholarships, or similar real "sanctions", then I would agree that the passage of the law and the delay in retiring the name would have harmed the University. But under the current "sanctions" imposed by the NCAA, no harm to us at all.
And your statement about the "inevitability" of "racial slurs, discrimination and violence against Native Americans", "turning ugly over the next few months" shows how terribly ignorant you really are of North Dakota, the opinions or feelings of those in the state, or how they will react to this.
What, you expect a reprise of 1862 Mankato?
There will obviously be alumni and citizens of North Dakota sad and unhappy with the need to drop the nickname. If you think that translates into people going out and and engaging in violence against native americans, wow.
In fact, I suspect most people in the state hold most, if not all, of their anger and frustration over this issue against the NCAA and not native americans, many of whom openly support the nickname or wear the logo.