Re: UNH Wildcats 2019 Offseason - How Much Progress Did We Really Make This Past Seas
Chuck,
I hope you put your name in the hat as you would be a great Commissioner. You could see more hockey and it probably has a good salary and a great benefits package.
Hope your summer is going well. Hope to see you at the Whit this year.
'32, thanks for the nice note. I was driving back from an appointment this afternoon, and for whatever reason, it was then that what you suggested struck me as a terrific idea. So, tell you what I'm gonna do … I'm going to freshen up my resume, and for craps and giggles, I'm going to put out my platform - my various ideas on how to make college hockey a better place than it is today. Whether it's as Hockey East commish, or as UNH's AD, or just as the conscience of the sport in general. Right here on the offseason UNH thread (lucky youze guys, eh?). Just for a glimpse, I'll get started tonight with a few quick thoughts …
(1)
Abolishment of Instant Replay - is there anything that's more of a buzzkill than the existence of instant replay? Has anyone ever walked away from a hockey game thinking "Thank God we had instant replay on that borderline offsides call in the second period?" No (at least no one with a shred of sanity). Is it a good hockey decision to scour three different camera angles to tell whether someone's skate was an inch above the blue line OR in contact with the blue line? Or whether someone was using a distinct kicking motion, or closed their glove on a puck?? Is instant replay REALLY essential for anything other than determining whether or not all of the puck broke all of the plane of the goal line??? There is technology available in both tennis and soccer which allows this to be determined virtually instantaneously. So … install the goal line tech, and abolish the rest. Nothing says stupidity like sucking the immediate emotion out of an OT GWG than the inevitable replay review. "Yay, we won!!" Oops, not yet. Wait for the video review … "Yay, we really won". Pure magic.

Just trust the refs with the rest of the calls. It's a game, it's entertainment, and it was fine for a hundred years of fantastic spontaneous momens. Don't fix what ain't broken.
(2)
OK to Kick the Crap out of the Puck - I never really understood why you can't kick the pick in for a goal. You can kick it pretty much anywhere else on the ice. There is skill in being able to control the puck with your skates. If you extend that to allowing intentional goalfront deflections with the skate, what's the big deal? You can deflect the puck for a goal with anything else - your stick, your knee, your elbow, your butt (see Pat Norton), your helmet, etc. And you can kick the crap out of the puck anywhere else on the ice surface. Are we really worried about Clint Malarchuk 2.0?
(3)
Open up the Bars and Let College Kids be College Kids - effective immediately, all HE arenas should be granted licenses to sell beer before and during games. And the drinking age at the arenas should be immediately lowered to 18 yrs. old. Basically, these kids are either going to drink in their dorm, or at someone's party or somewhere else on Friday or Saturday game nights. Why not just let it happen organically at the arena? Home teams only, unless the visiting team's fans come via bus and get passes to confirm they're not driving home. It's out there anyway, why not just make the game the best ******ing party on campus, force the frats to work on filling up prime drinking dates on travel weekends, or on other weekday evenings, or Sundays?
(4)
Do We Really Need 4 Officials? - I say NO. Three was enough for a very long time, and three should still be enough to cover the important things. Look at the money that the league would save right there. 25% reduction in on-ice personnel, and those old goal judges don't come back because of #1 above. The only really good reason to keep four around is a bit controversial …
(5)
Allow Fighting in College Hockey - nothing, and I mean NOTHING gets a hockey crowd going like a honest-to-goodness drop the gloves fight. Make it hurt, say a 10 minute penalty, or a 20 minute penalty even, but none of this suspension BS. It's a tough game, and it's allowed at all of the "next levels". Why put the players at a competitive disadvantage, and deprive the fans (with lots of beer) to a tremendous spectacle in the process? And last but not least ...
(6)
Make the 50-50 Raffle Really Count for Something - as in the past, the first 50% goes to the program. Instead of cashing out the other 50% to a winner every night, put the winner's name in contention for a mega-prize at the end of the season. If you're a participating family with kids, the end-of-season drawing among the 15 or so winners could come with a prize of a full year's free tuition, room and board at UNH (or whatever school is hosting your game). If you participate and don't have kids, then you win a Mercedes or a Beemer or similar type vehicle. A dealership sponsor could get loads of publicity off that alone.
I'm just getting started, folks. Hope this is a good start, thinking outside the box and all.
Next up will be the media/TV issue that's proven to be such a thorn in Joey B's side. Stay tuned ...