Re: UNH Wildcats 2018-2019: Souza the Opportunity or Louza the Opportunity
First of all, as to your last point, truth be told, he's played well … but not as well as you would want us to believe. He's had a good season, not a very good one, and certainly not a great one. The "elites" get to use the word "great". The ones not too far behind (all conference back-ups) get to be the "very goods". Good is not bad, and it's not mediocre. Good is good, and good is what Robinson has given UNH to date. That's not lazy - that's fact. It's more than I expected, but it's not quite up to the "very good" narrative you're trying to create, either. He may improve to the "very good" level next season or his senior season. We'll see. I truly hope he does.
First of all - this is not a fact, its your opinion. Its semantics. I guess your biggest quibble actually is the adjectives I've used to describe Robinson and the tiers I use to rank NCAA goaltenders more than any point I've made or Robinson's performance. If that's the case...
As to the whopper of 'em all … "heavy favorite odds on team MVP"?!?!?

Who are you, and what happened to the president of the "Max Gildon Fan Club"??
This is the type of argument I think is lazy. This is your JVR argument - JVR is a disappointment because Toronto prefers Tavares. The two are completely exclusive. Robinson can give UNH a terrific performance regardless of whether or not other goalies do the same for their team. It is irrelevant to the discussion.
Gildon is the best player. Robinson's steadiness, and the importance of what he's done earns him MVP from me. I should walk back the heavy favorite part, because I'd guess the team might consider Wyse neck and neck with Robinson. Again, however, the presence of other good players doesn't diminish Gildon's talent, production or impact.
Its also makes little sense to argue that failing to win a post-season award reflects poorly on a player's season. Those awards often go to players on successful teams and for goalies, in particular, often depend on that success/talent in front of them. Swap Robinson and Hawkey and the former, with PC in front of him, probably does win a post-season award this year. Winning that award, or not, changes nothing regarding his actual ability at this level and how he has played this season - it would simply reflect the team in front of him. Do you dispute that Robinson could win a post-season award if he played for PC? UMD? DU? If not than he is very good by your definition...
Ty Taylor this season turned out to be the Mike Robinson of last season. Next season, TT gets to prove whether he is going to be the next Mike Robinson and step up to challenge the incumbent, or if he's going to become the next Adam Clark, doomed to spit the bit most every time he gets a brief look-in. But to be clear (1) I want them both to excel, and (2) if TT can't make the step up to challenge MR, then I'll be 100% in Robinson's corner - just like I was this year, as those events played out.
You fail to accurately present Mike Robinson's freshman season. Robinson started two games as a FR and posted a .911 save-percentage in those games. He had 20 minutes of poor performance as a FR against Northeastern (in a game that saw Tirone pulled prior), when the team completely melted down in front of both goaltenders. In the remaining 90% of his minutes he posted a .932 SPCT. Robinson did not watch much of the season from the bench because he spit the bit in his chances. He sat because he was a FR playing for a Head Coach who often deferred to SRs, in spite of performance, over much of his tenure...
FWIW … Robinson posted a .003 difference in save percentage this year from his predecessor last year (Tirone), and one more shutout. That's one extra save per 300+ SOG's, or one in every 10 games. Considering the improved play of the top pairings this year, and a better frosh pairing replacing a mediocre pair of seniors (maybe slightly unfair to Marks. but otherwise spot on) … doesn't the team get any credit for that (slight) improvement? My recollection wasn't that you were touting Tirone as "very good" at this time last year. My thought at the time was that Tirone was a good D-1 goalie, and not as poor as you tried to make him out to be. Robinson making an extra save every 300 shots didn't drag UNH up to 8th. The overall team did that.
I knew you'd bring up Tirone. I have consciously tried to avoid the comparison, because there is no point in dredging up the goal tending play of the last few seasons. Since you've broached the subject, a few points...
First of all, as I clearly stated above - I'm discussing Robinson the same way I've discussed Tirone, by utilizing available statistics, evaluating skills, watching 90% of their games played, recognizing who they're playing, the team in front of them and comparing them both to national competitors. In doing so, yes, I see
Robinson as delivering a very good performance for UNH...
For someone adamant we evaluate goaltenders on their complete body of work its interesting you would raise a comparison to Tirone based on DT's senior season and not his entire career. I suppose we can do both, but it seems a little disingenuous...
Here is the reality when comparing the past two seasons - In 2017-18 UNH opponents ranked, on average, 49th in the country in scoring. This season, following the QF round, opposing offenses will represent an average goals-per-game ranking of 35th. So the numbers, that already favor Robinson, aren't as close as they seem.
While I would agree that the overall play of the team and the defense has improved this season - its more subtle than you insinuate. The large jump in defensive improvement came last season when Gildon and Maass arrived and Wyse improved as a Soph. Cameron Marks was a large part of that as well - neither Verrier or MacKinnon are impacting the game at his level yet. As for this season, one could just as easily make the argument that a more consistent and predictable netminder has absolutely impacted team's defensive play. You continue to ignore the difference between Robinson/Taylor's performance this year. While I don't think that defines or projects any lack of success for Taylor it does exhibit that this is not a team capable of shutting down opposing offenses and carrying a struggling goaltender - despite that Robinson gives them a real chance every night and is a big reason why they keep the score low most nights (that is very good by my definition and it always will be). The biggest difference this year is UNH consistently beating the bottom 30-teams in college hockey. Robinson's consistency is the largest contributor to that consistent performance.
FYI, Tirone was pulled five-times last year. Robinson has NEVER been pulled from a start...
Moving on to the two careers - Robinson is ahead of Tirone in all categories again. While its still close (largely due to over impactful outliers and a shorter career), it also includes half a season of Tirone's freshman year behind what was, undoubtedly, the best team either has ever played on. Robinson's currently sports a 2.42 GAA and a .917 SPCT - but those numbers are BADLY skewed by that 20-minute outing versus NU as a frosh. Removing that one outing bumps his career numbers up to 2.29 and .921. You don't like removing that one outing, but its is statistically overwhelming and effects the body of work far too much to ignore.
Ill give Tirone the same courtesy and remove his five-goal, 20 minute outing at UMass a few year's back. The one that almost - almost - forced him into an actual, competitive rotation. His updated career numbers would be .913 and 2.80 - essentially the same because his career is 3 times as long.
We don't need to dive deep into opinions on the talent, style, ability of the two. You know where I stand and you know exactly why I view the two very differently. Suffice it to say, Tirone is the polar opposite of Robinson. Robinson is extremely consistent and dependable, but as noted, has yet to exhibit the ability to steal a game for his team against a stronger opponent. Tirone was always capable of stealing a game, but the team never knew what they were going to get on a night to night basis. Or even a shift to shift basis. The team could play extremely well and it might not matter - Ill leave it at that. I have nothing more to say on the topic...
I hope Robinson & Company string together 4 straight shutouts to win the HE Tourney, and four more to win the big trophy.
Agreed, but like last year - it will be the ability to control the puck and generate offense that decides whether or not they can advance...