I think Chuck and Dan are confusing "devlopment" and immediate playing time.
The problem with the Anchor's preference system was not that it stiffled a freshman's development, it was that the freshman was ready by most objective standards, but kept in a limited role.
I'm OK with Miller playing 16 games out of 38 as a freshman, and otherwise developing during practices. I would have an issue if he plays better than Chanter or Marks, but doesn't see ice time. (Foegele syndrom). To wave the red meat to the crowd, was Brady stiffled by sitting his first year at NE? More realistically, Saviano only played 16 games, with 2 points, as a frosh. His development was not stifled. He was 5'6 and had to learn how his game translated to college. Much like Fregona.
Now, if Sacco or Nonis see the ice, I'll lead the charge to throw the Anchor overboard.
People have it all wrong.
Captain positions are about leadership and character. Yes some of our best players fit the criteria. Most of you know nothing about either Chanter or Tirone, so please stop talking out your derriere and try to find out why the players and coaches felt it important they were C and A respectively. If you were at the banquet it was very easy to see why they were chosen. I know many of you have your mind made up but look at captains on many teams and they are character guys even if they are on fourth line or third pairing. Sometimes the star players are not great leaders and do not put in the time to serve others and society. That is not to say that many stars can do this but you really are barking up the wrong tree and have been for the past few years. Norm Bazin had 68 pts in hockey east when it was much more offensive minded than today. Was he their best player? Was he and is he a great leader? Stop beating up players and work on your own issues as there is no sane person on earth that would ever give most of you a D1 job as a hockey coach under any circumstances. I know this is a fan board so please act like fans and stop predicting what will happen 6 months from now. I do not know who is going to be on whatever line and I do know that they want outlet passes from the shooting side for defensemen on UNH. Yes we have to take what we have (7 left shot and 3 right shots) and the best 6 will be playing regularly by mid to late October. The best players will be playing and 3 freshmen will likely be playing every night on the defensive pairings.
I hope you all enjoy the day and hope you have a great offseason.
Max Gildon is starting off the Gold Medal game on left defense. With Finland playing a decidedly uptempo game, he'll be pressed to skate at full tilt.
And Team USA wins the Gold.
Dan and I are on the same page with regards to the ramifications of Chanter's captaincy on next year's team, and the very strong likelihood that this will come at the expense of development of at least two of the incoming frosh d-men. Interesting that a guy who was recruited WAY ahead of Souza's time (Chanter) has been basically dragged off the emergency d-man scrap heap he occupied for his first two seasons, and is now going to captain next year's team. This bodes well for Nonis in two years' time.
I just edited a few things 'cuz we just don't see Tirone through the same focus ... but all in all, again I'm in agreement with Dan's overall gist. Robinson's long-term development should take precedence over a few more W's this coming season, but it won't. And that's because Coach DOES want to get to the NRN (the series will continue, Snively65) AND even more foolishly seems to believe his team has a 21+ win ceiling next season. Man oh man, do I hope he is right and I am wrong ... but I'll write it here for the first of what will likely be many times, IF next year's UNH team gets to the magic number (that's 14 - not 21), they're not going to get there until late February. It took winning the MBPBEGAM round to get to 14 last season (ultimately 15), or else this wouldn't even be a discussion (and in retrospect *may* have talked BS35+4 from buying out Coach's last year).
As to C-H-C's last comments, I'll respectfully disagree. The MacDonald decision was an unmitigated disaster, and now the Chanter decision is very likely to follow suit. That's not the fault of the kids - I have a ton of respect for both guys, but players who are on the fringes of the team that takes to the ice, and are not factors in some way in your team's biggest on-ice situations really do not warrant full captaincy. And being able to talk to the press effectively is an unbelievably craptastic reason to justify a poor decision.
I think someone mentioned that Cleland was "unexpected" last season, and yeah, maybe many of us were surprised he was the lone "C" ... but the kid was taking a regular shift since his frosh season, and had moved up the depth chart steadily throughout his UNH career. There's absolutely zero comparison with Chanter (or CMacD).
Pat Foley was arguably a 3rd line slug for most of his UNH career, but he too was getting regular ice from the start, and he set a physical tone for a very talented team that had always BADLY needed that kind of tone. He never piled up the points, but it was easy to see why he wore a letter for his last three seasons in Durham.
To the extent that Souza was Chanter's position coach, and may have vouched for his selection, then I'll lay this one at his door instead of Coach Umile's.
Wow - Impressive how you over simplify one conversation and ignore the other all at once. Everyone here understands that talent and leadership don't go hand in hand. Absolutely NO ONE has a problem with the captains not being stars.
What people have had a problem with in the past - is a player who shouldn't even have been in the regular line-up getting a C and being placed on the first line and PP unit as a result.
The reality for Chanter is he was always going to play - and should in my opinion - on the third pair. I'm completely ok with him as captain. But there is zero question that a C seals his place in the line-up and creates a slimmer window for three FR D to play. Even on a part time basis. That's a legitimate conversation even if you don't enjoy it. And I say that as one of Chanters most vocal fans on this board for years.
I'm not sure how you can question people wondering if the best players will play with a straight face. It has never been that straight forward with Umile and it IS one of the biggest reasons why recruiting went of a cliff. We need look no further than Salvaggio and McNicholas to know being better doesn't get you into the line-up or your deserved role as a FR or SO...
Tirone getting the A is a problem - I don't care how hard he works or that he stayed in the UML game to take a beating. He's not very good, has never been held accountable for his performance and certainly won't now thy he is not only an A but the only A. He should be forced to compete for the job - the letter ensures he won't have to (and should he play poorly - will never fully lose it)...
I couldnt agree more. ... Handing him a captaincy basically eliminates that competition. Unacceptable.
I love this opening! What an absolute, complete dou…People have it all wrong.
Are you talking about captains at UNH or captains on most other hockey teams on the planet? Here’s a list of NHL captains https://en.wikipedia Please feel free to tell us which ones on that list aren’t among the 3 or 4 most talented players on their team. You may find a couple, I didn’t dig in too deep but at a glance, good luck finding many more than that. Even then, at most you might find older guys who were the best on their team when they were named captains but have gotten older – obviously not a relevant scenario in college hockey. Talent. You lead a team by producing on the ice. What you do off the ice is great, and counts, but you can’t lead a hockey team if can’t contribute on the ice, that’s the first thing other players respect – not how well you talk with the press or how much money you raised for ORYHA.Captain positions are about leadership and character.
Such as?I know many of you have your mind made up but look at captains on many teams and they are character guys even if they are on fourth line or third pairing.
Nice to see you closing on the same condescending, arrogant tone you opened with. Apologies for not rolling over and peeing on ourselves at the wonder that is the current state of UNH hockey. Who are we to question the well-oiled machine they have cranking away up there in Durham. All is wonderful, nothing even remotely to be questioned here, clearly we don’t know enough about hockey to see how wonderful things are. Just sit back and try to learn a little bit about hockey so that we can enjoy those 10th place finishes like we should.Stop beating up players and work on your own issues as there is no sane person on earth that would ever give most of you a D1 job as a hockey coach under any circumstances. I know this is a fan board so please act like fans and stop predicting what will happen 6 months from now.
If that's not the title of next season's thread...As it is, 2017/2018 will be All About Dick and His Pursuit of the NRN, and finding a way to grind out 14 W's with a team that's averaged 13 wins during the first two years of the *genius* 3 year masterplan.
If you didn't believe it before, believe it now. 'Cuz that's our reality for the next 10-11 months ...
Ugggh. If there's one thing I hate more than people calling an alternate captain "assistant" captain, it's goalies wearing a captaincy letter. We never seem to do too well on this board predicting the next season's captains (I gave that up w/my season tix), but one prediction is easy to nail: UNH will do something weird. At least it wasn't the back-up goalie that got the 'A' this year.
No, it's alternate. It's always been alternate. Or maybe it's the Adjutant Captain? And the rest of your examples are pretty foolish, too, especially those last two, Dick Umile is the Manager of the UNH hockey team? And that last one, you do understand that Canadians and Americans spell some words - centre/center - a little differently but they're the same word, right?Semantics. Assistant or alternate. Behind the scenes the "A" is assisting the captain with all the responsibilities. Forward or Winger? Goalie or goalkeeper? Coach or Manager? Defenseman or defenceman.
No, it's alternate. It's always been alternate. Or maybe it's the Adjutant Captain? And the rest of your examples are pretty foolish, too, especially those last two, Dick Umile is the Manager of the UNH hockey team? And that last one, you do understand that Canadians and Americans spell some words - centre/center - a little differently but they're the same word, right?
My point is there is bigger issues to fry then someone incorrectly using assistant vs alternate captain. Hockey team or hockey club?
No, it's alternate. It's always been alternate. Or maybe it's the Adjutant Captain? And the rest of your examples are pretty foolish, too, especially those last two, Dick Umile is the Manager of the UNH hockey team? And that last one, you do understand that Canadians and Americans spell some words - centre/center - a little differently but they're the same word, right?
My point is there is bigger issues to fry then someone incorrectly using assistant vs alternate captain. Hockey team or hockey club?