Re: UNH Wildcats 2016 Offseason Thread - Searching for Direction
Before we get to the main event, just a quick note to our summer visitor, who was wondering why Walshy only started cheating when his program got good ... let's be clear, he only got caught after the program was successful. I'm all for letting the man and his legacy (good and not so good) rest in peace, but I'd also surmise that when you take a program from the depths to the heights of D-1 like he did, he probably didn't change his battle plan along the way. I can be a naïve person at times, but do I think Walshy kickstarted the program by sticking to the rules, and then only changed his ways when he needed to sustain that success? That doesn't make sense. Just sayin'.
Now, on to UNH family business. I've always been in favor of an open airing of all kinds of viewpoints, so although I strongly suspect the more critical aspects of the preceding post were addressed at least in part to me, I want it on the record that we need this kind of point-counterpoint to make this a fun and invigorating place to hash out topics where we're not all in agreement (i.e. basically everything).
See, that's how I know this was directed at me. We're off to a good start ...
I appreciate your hockey acumen and maybe you can go back to calling local sports stations and complain about everybody, everything and everything about everybody. I might be mistaken, but I presume none of you Joebags have ever coached hockey above the high school level.
... and now a quick turn for the worse.

For the record, my next call to a sports radio station will be my first, so at least it's not directed at me this time.

BTW - what's a "Joebag"??
Icon coaches you seem to adore have more losing seasons percentage (under .500) wise than UNH punching bag Dick Umile with far better talent.
Sean Walsh 3/17= 18% , 64% winning percentage with legendary recruiting violations
Two D-1 trophies - one (1) even without an asterisk (*), against UNH in 1999 with a team that by most informed opinions included less talent than their opposition. And if there was "far better talent", I'm pretty sure they weren't going to Orono for the scenery or the broad array of social distractions on offer down in the Hub o' the Universe. Speaking of which ...
Jerry York 11/45= 25% , 62% winning percentage with best players in country most years
You do realize that among his five (5) D-1 trophies, he won his first at Bowling Green? Ohio?? And he started his career at Clarkson? If talent was going to those places ... well, see my comments about Orono above. Maybe they went there because he was a good coach, y'know? And like Walshy, he picked his BC program out of the depths of D-1. Maybe being near Boston was helpful (see how well that's worked for perennial powerhouse Northeastern, or even across the river at Harvard), but let's not be a naïve yahoo homer, please?
Jack Parker 8/40=20%, 64% winning percentage with best players in country most years.
He's got three (3) D-1 titles to his credit, right? While coaching in that craphole known as Walter Brown Arena, right? Offered and refused an NHL job as Bruins head coach, right? Yeah, good point, what a schmuck.
Dick Umile (most hated man on USCHO) 3/26=12%, 62% winning percentage with far less talent than the others during his tenure.
Have you ever paused to wonder why Coach Umile never attracted the talent that these other guys attracted to Bowling Green OH, Orono ME, or the Babcock St. bomb shelter?
I presume when you compare yourselves to others in your chosen professions, you probably had some good years and some bad years and it is unlikely that your record is anywhere near Dick Umile's as a hockey coach.
Fair enough. But let me point out a few minor details. One, Coach Umile has chosen to compete in his high profile profession, and part of that means he accepts the risks (i.e. public criticism, open discussion of your job status, etc.) along with the rewards (i.e. high pay, ego friendly fun work, and awesome retirement benefits *nudge-nudge*). Two, his job performance has been steadily eroding over the last 13 (going on 15) seasons, as his last great season was 2002-2003 (great, as in HE Tourney title, and loss in the D-1 Finals). Three, he has enjoyed the benefit of unprecedented patience from his boss - the source of which has been a focus of debate for some time now.
I am very happy that Mike Souza is the coach in waiting and I think he might be on a list like the one above by the time he is done at UNH. Dick Umile has never had a lifetime contract at UNH. He has had long term contracts like most of the other top hockey coaches.
Unless you are Coach Umile, Mrs. Umile, Judy Ray, BS35+4 or someone who's worked in the UNH Legal office, you have no idea what kind of contract Coach Umile had after his 2000 dalliance with UMass Amherst.
Thanks Mike for the great interview and see you at the games this fall. I hope the gang can become positive and maybe guessing lines and defensive pairings is more constructive than the constant beatings inflicted on a fine man from Melrose, MA and a future coach from Wakefield, MA. Sorry for going back on my word Hockey Ref but I will try to never return if the dingbats can be fans and not Angry Bill from the 2003 Red Sox season all day long. I do not know how the season is going to turn out but I will be cheering for UNH regardless. We have a lot of young talent and we will know soon if we can put the puck in the net and stop the puck from our defensive net. Dick Umile is leaving in 20 months as our head coach and I hope the recent classes will head us in a positive direction.
Do you have a problem with the open discussion of ALL issues pertaining to UNH Hockey? That's kind of what this forum is here for, it's not a UNH fanboy site, I'm sure you can find or create something like that elsewhere. If you don't like what you're reading, you don't have to respond OR you can choose to engage. You've chosen to engage, and frankly I'm happy that you have, and have done so in the past. Bravo. That's what makes this place more fun and more relevant. Fanboys and yahoo homers can contribute, and critical fans can add their two cents if/when we feel the need to. The "I'm going to take my toys and go home" approach is beneath you, and you're wrong if you think the caustic voices on board here are not every bit the same fan of UNH that you (and others) are.
Anyway ... just for some perspective, about 5-6 years ago (I forget) I wrote an "Open Letter to Coach Umile" where I advocated for him to take some of the transitional approaches then that he's just getting to nowadays. The letter was fawning with praise of him and what he'd done for the UNH program during his first 20 or so years in the job. But it's become increasingly clear and apparent that he's not as engaged in his job as he's been in the past, and other programs with more engaged leaderships have been zooming past UNH in recent seasons. If you could somehow track down that post, I think you'd see that I was firmly in his corner, while realizing that changes were going to be needed to adjust to where he was in his career. I can assure you that "hate" is far too strong a word to use how most of us feel about his continued presence in his still declining program. I'd probably go as far as "annoyed", but that's just me.
And I certainly hope this works out for Coach Souza, notwithstanding the serial blandness of his interview with C-H-C. We all know he's been placed - or more accurately, chosen to be placed - in a tricky spot right now. My recent posts have only built on keen suggestions by other posters that he (Souza) is going to need to push the envelope of what's happening with HIS program before he actually assumes full control in March 2018. And my caution there (and here) is that if he doesn't push for his fingerprints to be increasingly on all parts of the UNH Hockey program starting yesterday, then he's only making his chances of success in an already-challenging succession plan even more difficult. You can feel free to agree or disagree ... but let's not extrapolate that into anyone "bashing" Coach Souza. Thx.
P.S. - my liberal use of terms like "yahoos" and "fanboys" etc. is intentional, to point out the other side of the coin to the one where you attempt to belittle those of us with silly labels, because we dare to dissent from the "blue skies", everything is just fine and dandy, happy days are here again approach you'd prefer that we ALL take. So there.
