Re: UNH Wildcats 2016 Offseason Thread - Searching for Direction
Souza is between the proverbial "rock and a hard spot" if anyone ever was.
I wouldn't call it "reflections" as there is very little insight provided. I also wouldn't call it "bs." He doesn't overpromise or try to sell anything about the team or its future. Its pretty bland. The most excited he gets is in the full paragraph gushing about Dick Umile and his impact on the program.
Because of the lack of content, I think the interview merely confirms what any party wants to think going in. Don't buy my thoughts below, because as you know, its what I feel going into the interview. I'd love to hear from those who feel positive about the structure going in, and how this advances their predictions.
So, to be as neutral as possible, my read of what he says between the lines:
1) He recognizes last year’s team talent level -- the effort was there, but still lost close cames. Difference is lack of talent.
I thought our guys competed very hard every night. We didn't get the result we wanted, more occasions than not but I think if you look at the one goal games that we were in, it was a testament to the fight we had.
to be honest with you because I know they put everything they had into this year and they didn't get the results they wanted.
2) Sees hope in this year’s freshmen
I think we're going to have some players that are going to have the opportunity to step up in more offensive roles and I think that's what college hockey is all about. Guys graduate, guys sign, new guys step up and I think we're confident in some of the players that we have. They have the ability to come in and step into a more prominent role and be good players for us and I like our freshmen coming in. I think our freshmen have nice balance, speed, skill and size and grit and all those things that can help to make us a formidable team this year in our league.
Lowry: Do you think there will be any problems scoring goals or it will be more a question of keeping the puck out of the net?
Souza: I think that's a tough question to answer because I don't think it's fair to say that we're not going to score goals when maybe there's some players that are going have the opportunity to be in roles to score goals. Maybe they'll have the ability to score and get in a more prominent role.
3) Not all that sure about defense. Keeps mentioning goaltending as the reason they'll keep goals down.
4) Provincialism -- while mouthing the words that he's willing to recruit in Europe, he seems to dismiss the talent there (for example, an NHL first rounder), saying he could get the same "in Boston." Well, he passed on recruiting the Finns who could have helped this year. Denver added an NHL first rounder late in the spring. BC passed on the leftover Boston kids, and took two Finns to complete their class. Providence passed on the leftover Boston kids and took a Finland's World Junior Team, a second round NHLer. So Souza's view is like saying "i'd date a girl from anywhere, but you can get a Kate Mara from Malden." Sort of hints that you don't recognize good looks if its not from your hometown Malden.
Souza: This gets back a little bit to the recruiting philosophy. I do think there's a lot of really good players in Europe, certain countries in particular. I also think there's a lot of really good players here in North America. I always say there's a really good play in Helsinki but there might be a better one in Boston so I think that just because the kid's a European doesn't mean it's going to help your program more than the kid from North America. But I do believe that there are a lot of benefits to having international players. It's a market that we've been involved with so we'll see where it goes. I think that when I was at Connecticut and at Brown we were able to bring some European kids to both of those programs. We want to get the best possible players for our program and it doesn't matter necessarily where they come from.
5) Effort
He keeps talking about effort and character. I would like him to be far more assertive about the need to recruit talent. The reason your 99 team was so good was because of talent.
Compare his the gold standard: first year reflections with those of Shawn Walsh.
When hired, Walsh recognized recruiting was the most important aspect of winning
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GRI9AAAAIBAJ&sjid=ii4MAAAAIBAJ&pg=1494,1951728
"In terms of recruiting, there is a difference between recruiting players who can play Division I and players who can win in Division 1," stated Walsh, who won't take a back seat to anone in the recruiting battles. "The days of Maine giving up on top quality players are over," said Walsh."
Two months into the job Walsh already had a plan and specific goals:
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=3gQ1AAAAIBAJ&sjid=F08KAAAAIBAJ&pg=5098,3322295
Note, the statement he is going after the top player in the country, Eric Weinrich, who was a priority.
At the one semester into the job, he immediately sent the signal -- hurtful to the current team but a signal to recruits -- that the talent level was inadequate and would not be tolerated.
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=RRE9AAAAIBAJ&sjid=aS4MAAAAIBAJ&pg=2716,6624535
"You can't expect to beat teams with 15-20 NHL draft choices with a team that has three NHL draft choices," said Walsh. "I'm somewhat disappoi8nted because I think we've gotten as much out of our players as we can, and we've been in 15 of our 17 games well into the third period. To have only five wins is a bit of a disappointment, but not unexpected." "And the second layer of the foundation may be even stronger because of the tremendous work done by our two assistant coaches in recruiting," said Walsh. "I wouldn't trade the verbal commitment we have now with anybody's in the country. What we've accomplished since April is satisfying."
at the end of his first year, he reflected:
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=SBI9AAAAIBAJ&sjid=ji4MAAAAIBAJ&pg=1232,5173577
At the beginning of his second year, he already had secured the monster recruiting class, and acknowledged
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=KAY1AAAAIBAJ&sjid=SE8KAAAAIBAJ&pg=1635,3596575
"let's not kid ourselves, we were not even close enought to competing in the league a year ago."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look, I understand Souza is in a bad position. First, he has two more years working under a boss he clearly, clearly loves, who got him the job. It's not his job or position to be Walsh -- the new Sherrif who can call a spade a spade, set standards and send a "shape up or ship out" message.
Yet, that is exactly the message that needs to be sent to recruits. Excellence, not effort. Yet, Souza either can't or won't say it because it would be a criticism of Umile. As a result, the interview focuses on selling a program because "UNH is a neat school that I really love, and Dick is a great guy" -- moments after telling the interviewer nobody remembers or cares about 99 or even the 2000s -- doesn't give an indication of how Souza is aggressively recruiting. And the results suggest not a lot of aggressive recruiting is going on. He can be as loyal and as supportive of the current players --'come on guys, work harder, study harder, I'm in your camp" -- but that is not going to do anything to improve the team next year.
They desperately need a kickstart. By dint of his allegiance, Souza either does not feel the need for a new start, or can't say it. Either way, he's hamstrung, so the interview is bland, doesn't really reveal the plan to make america great again. I understand he could not really speak his mind about this year, so his answers are "our team will work really hard, last year's games were close and this year we could [get lucky and] win." I won't hold that against him, given the talent level is locked in. But as we see from Shawn Walsh's quote, the key is recruiting, first, second and third. Until they find a message that resonates with recruits (and the results say no), all of the hard work won't matter. And the longer Souza struggles to find that message -- something that is hard enough without being tied to the anchor of a boss who deprives you of the ability to sell the "new sherriff, new excellence" message -- Souza will have lost credibility. You only have a limited window of the "new sherriff" message, and Scarano destroyed that.