Im going to be a rich man with a lot of time on my hands! Already I am able save my time, money and attention from the mismanagement that is UNH Hockey. Now I can do the same for the Boston Red Sox.
Thanks for providing the springboard for a quirky historical take on the Red Sox, Dan. Without question THE most successful North American sports franchise of the early 20th and 21st centuries combined, Boston's American League entry has established a pattern last century that looks to be eerily repeating itself this century. The Sox won the first-ever World Series in 1903, and would win their first World Series after an 86 year wait in 2004. The Old Sox would then go on to win four (4) more World Series titles in 1912-1915-1916-1918; interestingly enough, another Boston team (the NL's Braves) would chip in with the 1914 World Series title, in what was probably the biggest longshot to win a WS until the Miracle Mets of 1969. In the century that's now underway, the current Sox would win three more World Series titles, in 2007, 2013, and (wait for it) ... 2018.
Now, here is where the parallels get a little weird. Both in 1919 and 2019, the Sox possessed arguably the most dynamic players in baseball at the time. In 1919, it was some guy named Babe Ruth, who at the time was doing a pretty good pre-impersonation of Shohei Ohtani, starring both as a regular starting pitcher and otherwise as an everyday outfielder (FWIW Ruth and Ohtani are really the only two guys to ever be able to pull this off simultaneously in the 150+ years of MLB; more recently, pitcher Rick Ankiel would lose his touch as a pitcher, and would eventually reboot as a more-than-serviceable MLB outfielder a few years later). in 2019, it would be Mookie Betts who was arguably the best all-around player in the game. After one full season apiece with the Sox after their respective '18 WS titles, both players would be moved along, as their teams "rebuilt", and neither brought much back in return for their services, as ownership's focus at the time seemed to be elsewhere. Harry Frazee was focused in 1919 on financing Broadway shows, and sold/traded a steady stream of Ruth's teammates to NY ... while in 2019 and thereabouts, FSG/John "Whitey" Henry seem to be WAY more focused on Liverpool FC, Pittsburgh Penguins, and a purported in-the-works plan to buy an NFL franchise TBD in the future, so they've hired a former Tampa Bay GM to hopefully keep the Sox competitive "on the cheap" as in TB.
So, what does this mean for you currently-spoiled, but soon-to-be-tested-beyond-all-comprehension Red Sox fans?
* The Sox will be horrible for the better part of the next decade, but they will probably see new ownership afterwards;
* The new owner will be "from away", and will do everything possible to ingratiate himself with the locals via charity;
* Said new owner will probably build his best early teams from retreads of a fellow successful AL franchise (Houston?);
* They will then stumble onto "the greatest hitter who ever lived", who will hit .400 just before World War 3 erupts;
* Said superstar will spend the prime of his career fighting bomber missions over Eastern Europe instead of hitting .400;
* The not-so-new owner will mistakenly put his faith in his former HOF shortstop, who will run things in a very racist way;
* The superstar's Eastern European successor will lead the Sox to a surprise (yet still losing) trip to the WS circa 2067;
* The now-long-in-the-tooth owner will pass away circa 2076 after another close-but-not-quite dalliance with a WS title;
* His surviving wife will co-own the team in trust with a former trainer and back-up catcher for another 10 or so years;
* The ownership in trust will eventually sell out to an albino day trader who wants out of owning an NL expansion team;
* The albino day trader leads the Sox back to the promised land circa 2103. After, he'll declare his predecessor as racist.
* Then lather, rinse and repeat for another 15 or so years of fantastic success, and another 85 years of off-field stupidity.
Soccer, nor Qatari affairs, will certainly not be my new hobby, any other suggestions...?
I did a deep dive into rugby a couple of years ago, and I can actually now tell the difference between rugby union and rugby league. There is a pretty good pro local team (NE Free Jacks) in the upstart Major League Rugby (MLR), who have a pretty spunky rivalry with their NY rivals, too. You still seem a little too young to be that into golfing, but maybe I'm mistaken? But at all costs, definitely avoid falling for that softball stuff ... ;-)