I know the conversation has been going on for a bit of time, but I heard more grumblings on how the NCAA may look to expand the hockey tournament to include more teams (maybe 24 or 32). I can’t remember how long hockey has kept it at 16 but it’s been quite a while I feel.
I understand there’s more $$$ with more teams in the show, but I really hope they keep it to 16. The more teams that get in I feel it dilutes the quality of play, and takes away from success in the RS.
At the same time maybe with an expanded playoffs UNH will have a better shot to get back to the show - it’s been nearly 13 years since our last invite to the dance (2013).
It’s probably just a matter of time though… all leagues (both professional and college) are moving in this direction. I wonder when it will actually be implemented, and what form it takes. Maybe in the next 3-5 years?
I'm totally in favor of leaving it alone. The conferences have been their worst enemies with their all-inclusive conference tourneys devaluing the regular season schedule enough already. UNH made it to the FF under Umile 3 out of 4 times from a 12 team field, and only in 2003 in the inaugural season of 16 teams.
Back in the College Hockey Dark Ages (CHDA), roughly coinciding with the birth of Hockey East in the mid-'80's, Coach Holt's UNH teams in the then-much-larger ECAC were making it with less than ten (10) teams in the national tourney field, sometimes with as low as 4 participants. You really had to earn it.
When you say "all leagues - pro and college - are moving in this direction" that's only partially true. On the college front, it's really only been Football that's been regularly expanding, but that has more to do with the gradual transition of the long-standing Bowl system to an actual playoffs format, so I think there have been winners and losers in that process. But having something in place to allow a National Title to be won on the field, and not as a result of some polls (which sometimes would determine multiple "winners" for the same season) is a very good thing for fans of the competitive process.
In the North American professional leagues, the NHL was the first to ever pit teams that did not win their divisional title to participate in the postseason. Of course, when there was a single "division" league throughout the Original Six era, coming up with a postseason format that didn't just pit the two top teams was probably a financial necessity. It was eventually taken to an absurd level in the '70's when they first came up with the current 16 team playoffs format, albeit when there were only 21 teams in the entire league. That's a 75%+ qualification rate, which was crazy. To their credit, it's been almost 50 years now where the NHL has kept its postseason at 16 teams, now with a total of 32 teams (50%). I give them a ton of credit for their restraint.
The NBA started post WW2 and for their first 20 years, with many teams in mid-size Rust Belt cities like Syracuse, Rochester (NY), Fort Wayne and others, plus St. Louis and Baltimore, they also went in the NHL's direction with non-divisional winners qualifying, and they too gradually got to the magic 16 teams after the ABA merger. That had been pretty steady for almost 40 years, until the pandemic drove them to the silliness of the "play in games" format they use now. But before that, they had been just over 50% qualifying (16 teams out of 30), so this 50% target figure seemed to gradually emerge at the pro level this century.
Baseball's World Series was the North American originator of postseason team sports, pitting the NL and the upstart AL (1900) champions against each other starting in 1903, and every year since except 1904 and 1994 (insert obligatory Montreal Expos whine here). That turned out to be 2 out of 16 teams for over a half century, and it wasn't until MLB expansion landed at 24 teams, including four 6 team divisions in 1969 (insert arrival of Les Expos du Montreal here), that postseason playoffs not involving a tie for the league pennant first emerged, with 4 teams out of 24 qualifying (17%). But all of the qualifiers won a division, so the phenomenon of "wild card" postseason involvement did not darken baseball's postseason format until 1995 (the year after the strike/another Expos whine) when both leagues went to 3 divisions, with the divisional winners plus the single WC qualifying (8 teams). In the 21st century, without Montreal to kick around anymore, half of the now 12 post-season berths are now via WC. I don't follow MLB anymore. I'll let you folks speculate as to why not lol.
Finally, come on down NFL. They used to have the absolute best system in pro sports, period end of sentence. Initially, in the NFL it was like MLB, you win your division, you go directly to the NFL Championship game (1933-1965). Then came the AFL merger, first put into place with the NFL adding 10 AFL teams in 1970 to create six divisions, three per league. Enter the "wild card", which was so poorly defined initially that they didn't come up with tiebreakers until after a near catastrophe was avoided in December 1970 when the Giants got trounced by the mutinous LA Rams 31-3 on Week 14 to allow Dallas (who would have lost the division on tiebreakers to NYG) to slide into first, and face the wild card Lions, who fittingly lost a 5-0 (!) barnburner to "Next Year's Champions", who of course would win the NFC but then lose to the Baltimore Colts in SB5. At least this time around, Dallas did prove to be "Next Year's Champions" at last when they trounced upstart Miami in SB6 at the end of the 1971 season. A single wild card was sufficient for a long long time ... but the NFL, whose greed knows no bounds, now has six wild cards and eight division winners, making it 14 teams in the postseason out of 32 overall teams (44%). Bleccccch ...
TRIVIA QUESTION: In the 25 year "Original Six" era NHL playoffs, the #1 RS finisher would face the #3 RS finisher, and the #2 RS finisher would face the #4 RS finisher to determine who advanced to the Stanley Cup Finals.
Did the #4 seed ever win the Cup in that era? How many times did the #3 seed win the Cup?