What the hell, btw, does that actually mean?
I am confused to which parts of what you quoted is confusing.
JB said:
Conmy, unfortunately, didn't mesh well (wasn't well liked). That isn't to say Conmy is an a-hole, just that for whatever reason it didn't work and maybe winning would have solved all "the problems" as it normally does.
Let's see if I can say the same thing with different words
- I truly think it is unfortunate that he wasn't "well liked in the locker room" which is what I heard from places that would know.
- I don't necessarily think he is a @ss, probably really frustrated... loosing can be super frustrating I get that
- In sports winning tends to solve (or at least gloss over) a ton of problems, personalities that might not naturally fit together regularly do on winning teams. Frustrations are lower and people are happier when winning.
He centers the first line for one of the best programs in college hockey. You, Meathead, and Buford, used the smear campaign to suggest what? It's good that he left? Are you that lost?
Oh, and by the way, do you remember the series of idiot posts suggesting Conmy really wasn't that good. Norbert a/k/a Meathead and you were pushing that angle pretty hard last spring. How's that opinion aging?
Look you can take well reasoned posts and have a bunch of histrionics, create fake drama, claim a smear campaign and a bunch of other nonsense. Doesn't make any of it true.
1) Sometimes if you just stand or sit in the right place you hear public conversations on the railing or in the seats next to you. Other times you have the actual conversation over a beer. Never do you say who said what or you don't get to hear the information in the future. Thinking otherwise is simply naive.
2) I do think Conmy under performed last year. I think there are some pretty good reasons: a) based on the rest of the team and the last 8 years there is a good chance he needed better coaching - yes I still think it is great coaching in college hockey that makes a difference, b) as a small stature player clearly the best on the team he got lots of physical attention and his game didn't react well, c) probably a pretty good chance he was frustrated, I would be... these are all suppositions. None of these opinions is suggesting Conmy isn't that good - good players even the best scorer on a bad team can have a bad year. Observing it and saying it doesn't make it a smear campaign
3) Maybe UNH is better without Conmy and the problem was all chemistry (doubt it). Maybe all the CHL work happened because Conmy left and the coaching staff had an o'sh!t moment (feels plausible). I generally think winning in college is about acquiring talent, and Conmy has talent. Additionally I think having high end talent leave is a bad sign to other talented players.
4) I think there is a pretty good change Conmy has a fantastic season this year. He is playing on a line with other high end talent which will give him more space to operate and confidence in his line mates. Smaller players tend to do better when they have a little more space to create magic with the puck. I hope it is a better fit for him.