What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH- How Far West Do We Go?

2013hockeyfan said:
A coach at a private institution has virtually the same calculus in deciding whether to cut a player against the potential reputation impacts and litigation possibility. I was curious if you were aware of specific regulatory considerations for the coaches at UNH but as expected it was just nonsense.

Surely you will move the goalposts here in a reply.
Click to expand...

Private institutions dont have to open the books or have have statutory requirements mandating quarterly or annual reporting to the general public and taxpayers.

Big difference and a completely different set of rules. Think of the reporting requirements of a publicly trading company versus a privately traded company. The public company needs to report quarterly earnings to regulators, investors and the public at large. A private company tracks all the same financials but has no requirement to open its books to the public.

Conceptually, the same as if this situation happened at UNH vs a private school like BU.
 
TheGrouchyCat said:
Private institutions dont have to open the books or have have statutory requirements mandating quarterly or annual reporting to the general public and taxpayers.

Big difference and a completely different set of rules. Think of the reporting requirements of a publicly trading company versus a privately traded company. The public company needs to report quarterly earnings to regulators, investors and the public at large. A private company tracks all the same financials but has no requirement to open its books to the public.

Conceptually, the same as if this situation happened at UNH vs a private school like BU.
Click to expand...
What does opening the books have to do with the decision to cut a player???

Goalposts in this case not moved but replaced with a tree.
 
2013hockeyfan said:
What does opening the books have to do with the decision to cut a player???

Goalposts in this case not moved but replaced with a tree.
Click to expand...

Private Schools are not government agencies. They are not bound by constitutional due process, first amendment constraints, state administrative law, public records laws and state oversight bodies.

Therefore, private universities allow coaches more autonomy in roster decisions, remove players without public scrutiny, resolve disputes internally without public disclosures, take action based on fit or culture without legal review and use private conduct codes or discipline processes.

The decision making process is entirely internal at a private institution and not subject to public disclosure laws.
 
[QUOTE="Chuck Murray, post: 2966737, member: 53"

... oh, and don't forget ... you don't have any sources, I don't have any sources, and actually no one but potty has sources lololol ... 😂😂😂😂😂😂
[/QUOTE]

Yep, no sources at all as I have a former player texting me as we speak, lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top