What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH Hockey Off Season Thread 2026

From RMS Hockey

LeaguePoints FactorGoals Factor Assists Factor
OHL0.580.610.54
USHL0.560.510.59
WHL0.460.420.49
QMJHL0.450.400.51
BCHL0.350.310.38

USHL & BCHL are 3 year averages.

Gives some idea of where on average these guys "should" land scoring wise.

Now UNH's players under performed the QMJHL average.

PlayerPoints FactorGoals FactorAssists Factor
Oliver0.130.040.29
Newcombe0.190.220.16
Gagnon0.220.210.23
Carr0.160.330.13

The new recruits look great on paper. Need the coaching staff to put them in an improved system to use those talents.
 
Thanks for the opening JB, I hope you don't regret teeing me up. Here I go...

Guité's commitment made me wonder about UNH's recent recruiting. It sure seems that a higher caliber of player has been committed over the last two classes (in spite of a slow start for last season's first years) and I wanted to know if statistics would back up that perception. I'm sure my research has its flaws, but here is what I found when comparing forward recruits and their point totals in their final seasons of junior/prep ahead of UNH matriculation...

UNH Forward Recruits, 2025-26:
If Guité begins his UNH career this fall, he would be the 12th forward recruit to join the Wildcats in the past two off-seasons. In other words, he would be the 12th forward to commit in the new 'CHL eligibility' era...

Ten of those 12 recruits (transfers included) played their final 'junior' season in a premier North American league. With another (Svartstrom) playing in the BCHL (Tier 2/Tier 1b) and one (Johnson) playing in the NAHL (Tier 3). That's 83.3 percent of recruits finishing their junior hockey in tier one.

Eight of the forwards in this era posted at least 0.90 points per game in the final junior season, with a ninth (Gagnon) scoring 0.93 points per game in his second to last junior season. Hyles & Zebeski each scored a hair over 0.70 ppg, while Van Tassell was the lowest scorer in his final junior season at 0.60 ppg. That's 75% of forward recruits notching a season of 0.90 ppg or better in their junior hockey career.

As a group, UNH forward recruits over the past two classes combined for 393 goals, 354 assists and 747 points in 790 games over their seasons directly preceding their UNH careers. That's an average of 0.95 points per game.

Notes:
* As UNH production and records fell, Watcher used to annually lament the lack of Top-50 USHL point scorers to choose UNH. Player's from these past two recruiting classes combined for 13 Top-50 junior scoring seasons - eight in the QMJHL, two in the USHL and one each in the BCHL, the NAHL and USports. Guite, Gagnon & Oliver each have TWO Top-50 scoring seasons in the Q...
* This season saw Tournas (16th) and Guite (28th) post Top-50 QMJHL seasons, while Romeo (18th) and Hyles (50th) were Top-50 USHLers...
* Svartstrom was 5th in BCHL scoring during the 2024-25 season...

Now, here's where it gets interesting...

UNH Forward Recruits, 2018-2024:

This group includes all FORTY-SIX forward recruits during Mike Souza's first seven season's as head coach. For simplicities' sake, I'm not diving into which player's were recruited when. Undoubtedly, some players in this group would have been recruited before Souza's assistant tenure in Durham began. I believe Patrick Grasso (0.72 PPG / USHL) is one example that skews the numbers a bit, but its not THAT serious...

This collection of recruits includes 18 USHLers (39.1%), 11 BCHLers and 1 SHL U20 alum (26.1%), and 16 players who finished their pre-UNH careers in the NCDC, NAHL, EHL, AJHL or a US High School (34.8%). So under 40% from an elite junior circuit, though to be fair the BCHL was better then...

Just 16 of these 46 players posted pre-UNH seasons of 0.90 points per game or higher. Only two of those player's played in the USHL, while five played in the BCHL. The rest played tier three juniors or US High School hockey. The top three were all HS players and totaled at least 1.80 ppg, led by Ryan Black, who scored 2.25 points per game in his final season at the Winchendon School before heading to Babson. Only 34.8 percent of the forwards recruited in this era reached 0.90 ppg...

The 46 forward recruits over this seven-year span combined for 875 goals, 1180 assists and 2055 points in 2501 games. That's an average of 0.82 points per game...

Notes:
* The 0.82 PPG average likely skews high due to production in weaker leagues, as only 7 of 16 USHLers even managed to crack 0.60 points per game...
* Eight of these 46 players finished their college career with 80 points or more. Five of whom scored more than 0.90 in their final junior season, while three did not...
* Liam Devlin scored more than 80 points as a Wildcat, despite scoring at a rate of just 0.45 ppg in his final USHL season...
* Just one of these 46 players has scored 100 career points or better. One other will, almost certainly, join that club (Can anyone tell me what they have in common?)...
* Removing the three high school PPG totals (Black, Richels, Pierson) drops the overall PPG for this group to 0.77...

UNH Forward Recruits, 2014-2018:

Now let's look at the recruits from the four seasons prior to Souza's head coaching tenure. Though he was an assistant during the last three years of this sample, he recruited very few, if any, of these 17 forwards himself. Most would have been recruited by now MC head coach Scott Borek.

Nine of the 17 forwards in this sample played in the USHL or for the US NTDP (52.9%), three played in the BCHL (17.7), while three played in the EJHL and two played prep hockey (29.4%). Once again, the BCHL was a better league the further back one researches, so let's say anywhere between 52.9 and 70.6 percent of recruits played high level juniors...

Seven of 17, including two BCHLers and one USHLer scored at least 0.90 PPG. The remaining high scorers include three EJHLers and a CAN High Schooler. That makes 42.1 percent reaching the 0.90 PPG plateau...

This group combined for 421 goals, 519 assists and 940 points in 991 games, scoring at a rate of 0.95 PPG in their final seasons of junior hockey...

Notes:

* This group scored an identical PPG rate to the last two classes, but the number was skewed a bit by prep-schooler Warren Foegele's 2.06 PPG at St. Andrew's...
* Ironically, Tyler Kelleher DID NOT reach 0.90 PPG in his final junior season. He posted 41-43--84 in 100 US NTDP games played (0.84 PPG)...
* Michael McNicholas (BCHL) and Matt Willows (EJHL) each scored more than 80 career points for the Wildcats...
* Kelleher (USNTDP) and Grayson Downing (BCHL) each topped 100 career points...
* Andrew Poturalski (USHL) scored 81 career points and would have blown past 100, and I'd wager Foegele (17 UNH points) would have cracked the century mark too, had either played four years collegiately...

--

So, all that said, what do we see in the numbers?

It sure looks like recent UNH forward recruits are FAR more productive than their counterparts from the bulk of Souza's recruiting career, and far more in line with players committed at the end of Borek's tenure. Many more player's in the current group have done their scoring in a top junior league - certainly relative to Souza's previous targets, and perhaps even when compared to Borek's. So there is certainly a reason for optimism, but questions remain...

1) Will UNH's better recruiting results translate to the college level OR are all NCAA Hockey programs benefiting from a larger player pool? Has productivity changed relative to the competition or just to their predecessors?

2) How does the QMJHL - where UNH has found most of its newest recruits - compare to the OHL, WHL or previous iterations of the USHL? The Q is often cited as the weakest of the Canadian Junior Leagues? Is that stereotype or fact? Or variable? Is the CHL simply a higher scoring brand of hockey?

3) What do we make of last season's newcomer production? Many expected more scoring on the whole, and certainly from specific players. Yet, several of UNH's highest scoring forwards did not produce at a high level in their FR seasons. Even Jason Krog managed just 4 goals and 20 points as a frosh. Paul Thompson had 21 points over his first two seasons in Durham. Perhaps even 20 year old CHL freshman need learning curves?

4) Do the results of the last 8-12 seasons indicate the coaching staff has suffered from developmental issues or from lesser raw talent? Will more talent make them better coaches? Or, to paraphrase Dennis Green, are they who we thought they are?

5) The current recruiting sample is the only one of the three to combine for more goals than assists in their final junior season. Does UNH lack playmaking forwards? Are quality finishers potentially wasted by an inability to move pucks?

6) How will the defense and goaltending groups support what has - at least on paper - the potential to be the most dangerous group of forwards UNH has had in a long while?

--

tldr - UNH's recent forward recruits are scoring more in better leagues than those in previous classes...

And...post!
 
Last edited:
OK - I am happy about teeing you up. This is the type of numbers based hockey discussion I appreciate, particularly in the off season.

After 1 year the RMS Hockey numbers seem to indicate 4 tiers of recruiting landscape:

Tier 1 - USHL and OHL
Tier 2 - WHL and QMJHL
Tier 3 - BCHL
Tier 4 - everyone else (?)

We will need to see how this progresses.

I think this means the overall talent in college hockey is rising, 3 new feeding leagues that perform at the higher end. Still there is only ~1690 roster spots with on average ~460 available a year (that is 420 + an additional 10% for early departures - in 2024 it was 37 early departures so that is about right).

My friend google says the rules change opened up 297 potential CHL players for 2025-2026 and the NCAA Freshman Class had this break down:
CHL174
USHL150
BCHL89
All Other103

Those numbers say 2025-2026 it was 516 incoming freshman. Maybe the extra 50-60 players displaced people on the bottom end of the roster, maybe it was just a bubble year because the 420 assumes a uniform distribution... maybe....

1) I think there is a potential both are true at the same time. UNH appears to be getting better talent from USHL and QMJHL and at the same time there are more players so everybody is getting better talent

2) See above after 1 year... QMJHL seems to be translating, on average, as the weakest of the CHL but there isn't much light between QMJHL and WHL.

3) This is my biggest worry. I just don't see a winning offensive strategy. I see UNH bring in a bunch of bigger bodies Newcombe and MacDonald last year, Svartstrom, Zebeski, Hyles and Tournas this year but I haven't seen an offensive system to take advantage of those players. More often then not last year when Newcombe and MacDonald would get position down low UNH would do nothing with it. I watched how Denver, Western and even Michigan ran screen and tip plays. Yes talent and also intentional plays to get pucks from low to high back toward the net for a tip. Denver had a ton of tips against Cornell and Michigan against.... UMD maybe... had a beautiful low cycle to D with a forward rotating for a tip goal - the timing of 3 forwards and a D-man was just beautiful on this goal. You can even look at Wisco's crashing style as an option. I don't see this in UNHs play, it just doesn't appear to be what the coaches are asking for in the offensive zone.

4) My father in law did some Div II college sports coaching. His comment is college sports is ALL about recruiting. You need to recruit the right players to fit your system and needs and if you get the wrong players (talent and fit) you are in trouble. I think having better talent is huge for UNH.... BUT I worry the coaches are who we thought they are... so the system is the 98-99 team and there is no Jason Krog (the passer or the shooter).

5) see 3 & 4...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dan
I listened to an interview with Nate Leaman in which he discussed the CHL players. Their transition to college has been excellent. He said the knocks on CHL players prior to last year, such as not being interested in school work and being lousy teammates, turned out to be completely wrong. Leaman said CHL kids love college, are taking advantage of the new opportunity and are excellent teammates.

College will only become more popular with CHL kids. I expect the trickle down impact will be profound. New England players will have fewer opportunities at D1 and the route to D1 will be through OHL. The level of play in college hockey will only improve.

Leaman also mentioned having college hockey possibly join USA hockey, leave the NCAA, and add 20 schools. He wants schools with club teams to think D1. Leaman is an interesting guy.
 
Tier 1 - USHL and OHL
Tier 2 - WHL and QMJHL
Tier 3 - BCHL
Tier 4 - everyone else (?)

We will need to see how this progresses.

1) I think there is a potential both are true at the same time. UNH appears to be getting better talent from USHL and QMJHL and at the same time there are more players so everybody is getting better talent

2) See above after 1 year... QMJHL seems to be translating, on average, as the weakest of the CHL but there isn't much light between QMJHL and WHL.

3) This is my biggest worry. I just don't see a winning offensive strategy. I see UNH bring in a bunch of bigger bodies Newcombe and MacDonald last year, Svartstrom, Zebeski, Hyles and Tournas this year but I haven't seen an offensive system to take advantage of those players. More often then not last year when Newcombe and MacDonald would get position down low UNH would do nothing with it. I watched how Denver, Western and even Michigan ran screen and tip plays. Yes talent and also intentional plays to get pucks from low to high back toward the net for a tip. Denver had a ton of tips against Cornell and Michigan against.... UMD maybe... had a beautiful low cycle to D with a forward rotating for a tip goal - the timing of 3 forwards and a D-man was just beautiful on this goal. You can even look at Wisco's crashing style as an option. I don't see this in UNHs play, it just doesn't appear to be what the coaches are asking for in the offensive zone.

4) My father in law did some Div II college sports coaching. His comment is college sports is ALL about recruiting. You need to recruit the right players to fit your system and needs and if you get the wrong players (talent and fit) you are in trouble. I think having better talent is huge for UNH.... BUT I worry the coaches are who we thought they are... so the system is the 98-99 team and there is no Jason Krog (the passer or the shooter).

5) see 3 & 4...

Interesting to see how the tiers have shaken out early in the CHL recruiting era; I'd guess the USHL needs an agreement with the CHL leagues to hold firm in the top tier(s). As things stand now, I could see the USHL talent pool diluted by New England players heading to the QMJHL, Midwest kids choosing the OHL and Western prospects opting for the WHL, which could potential drop the American junior league into a tier with the BCHL...

From your father-in-law's lips to the God's ears. His observation is the first rule of college athletics - always has been and always will be regardless of the circumstances. Now, I have, and will continue to argue, there are different ways for different schools to attract top talent/fit, but you better find them if you want to win. Whether UNH coaching will play up (or not) with better talent remains to be seen, but at least the talent now exists for us to find out for certain. The Wildcats must be a good team this season, and will need to see improvement from its second-year CHLers to do so. Otherwise...

In the future, UNH does need to make inroads into the OHL & WHL. I do think the most likely outcome is those two leagues becoming the dominant recruiting grounds. Ontario, and in particular Ottawa & The Greater Toronto Area, have historically been fruitful recruiting grounds for UNH. While not quite as 'local' as Quebec and the Maritimes, no one could argue with a straight face that the province is far away. If UNH could mine talent from the BCHL, they can do the same in the WHL. A successful HE team would have strong QMJHL connections and an ability to consistently pluck talent from the other CHL leagues; I don't think relying solely on the Q will be a long-term road to legitimate contention (especially as the CHL effect settles), but we will see how things shake out...

--

* Just one of these 46 players has scored 100 career points or better. One other will, almost certainly, join that club (Can anyone tell me what they have in common?)...

No takers? I initially worded the two players as a forgone conclusion and may have created confusion, so perhaps clarification helps with an answer...
 
Last edited:
I think there are essentially 2 high-level strategies.

1) Pick a system and go find talent that fits it. My favorite sports strategy example was Patriots with Tom Brady. That offense was built on short-quick passes where he could see the defensive issues most of the time before the snap. That strategy drove most of the player acquisition, quick receivers that can get open over fast receivers, not as much needed on O-line because the ball was going to be gone so fast, running backs who could catch over one that could run up the middle. Does this mean they only did that, no, but that is what set everything else up. Know your offense go get the players that fit.

2) Get the players you can and be creative enough to adjust the offense to fit the talent. If you have a bunch of water bugs play water bug hockey, if you have a bunch of trees play for tips and rebounds, make a mess at the top of the crease.

Michigan, North Dakota, etc. get to do strategy #1. If you are UNH I think you need to do strategy #2. That means really good coaching, and maybe even line A plays water bug strategy and line B plays tree strategy and that is OK. That however means excellent teaching because what are you doing with a partial line change etc. How do you get your players to think the game they way you want them to?
 
No takers? I initially worded the two players as a forgone conclusion and may have created confusion, so perhaps clarification helps with an answer...

One scored exactly 100 points... the other needs to find just 9 more...
 
One scored exactly 100 points... the other needs to find just 9 more...

On the money.

The only player recruited during the Souza HC era to reach 100 points is Stiven Sardarian, who scored 100 points on the nose, but spent just two seasons at UNH and scored 79 of his career points for Michigan Tech. Ironically enough, Sardarian has the 11th-lowest final junior season PPG of the Souza HC era. He scored just 0.52 PPG in 46 games with Youngstown (USHL) during the 2020-21 season...

Ryan Conmy will surely join Sardarian in the Century Club early next season. Conmy also transferred after his sophomore season; 36 of his first 100 career points will count for Boston College and not UNH. He was a 1.03 PPG scorer in his final USHL season with Sioux City...
 
Last edited:
It will be interesting to see the shake out between CHL leagues. Over time I'd expect the American kids to be more interested in the OHL than the QMJHL, even though the OHL is a tougher league. I've known a few kids that attended McGill in Montreal and they noted the prejudice Americans experience in french Canada. It was profound. That was pre-Trump so it's only gotten worse. Never heard prejudice is an issue in Ontario.

With American kids going to the Q to take Canadian hockey jobs expect it to only get worse. Curious what others on here have heard.
 
Presently, American players don’t have a choice - the CHL leagues hold draft rights to different regions of the US. The QMJHL has dibs on New Englanders.

The OHL & WHL split the rest of the country somewhere around the Mississippi…
 
For me the question at the Junior level is really around the USHL. Where does that league end up.
Does it hold its current position in the development pipeline or do top USHL players end up in the CHL?
What is the value at the player/family level of USHL vs OHL?
Does the CHL expand and consume the USHL and BCHL and there is a consolidation.
Is there a reason to keep the separated at this point?

It will take time of this to shake out simply because nothing is standing still. A smart strategist in the USHL is already running scenarios and developing a new "how we win" because the paradigm of junior hockey has shifted.
 
Thanks for the opening JB, I hope you don't regret teeing me up. Here I go...

Guité's commitment made me wonder about UNH's recent recruiting. It sure seems that a higher caliber of player has been committed over the last two classes (in spite of a slow start for last season's first years) and I wanted to know if statistics would back up that perception. I'm sure my research has its flaws, but here is what I found when comparing forward recruits and their point totals in their final seasons of junior/prep ahead of UNH matriculation...

UNH Forward Recruits, 2025-26:
If Guité begins his UNH career this fall, he would be the 12th forward recruit to join the Wildcats in the past two off-seasons. In other words, he would be the 12th forward to commit in the new 'CHL eligibility' era...

Ten of those 12 recruits (transfers included) played their final 'junior' season in a premier North American league. With another (Svartstrom) playing in the BCHL (Tier 2/Tier 1b) and one (Johnson) playing in the NAHL (Tier 3). That's 83.3 percent of recruits finishing their junior hockey in tier one.

Eight of the forwards in this era posted at least 0.90 points per game in the final junior season, with a ninth (Gagnon) scoring 0.93 points per game in his second to last junior season. Hyles & Zebeski each scored a hair over 0.70 ppg, while Van Tassell was the lowest scorer in his final junior season at 0.60 ppg. That's 75% of forward recruits notching a season of 0.90 ppg or better in their junior hockey career.

As a group, UNH forward recruits over the past two classes combined for 393 goals, 354 assists and 747 points in 790 games over their seasons directly preceding their UNH careers. That's an average of 0.95 points per game.

Notes:
* As UNH production and records fell, Watcher used to annually lament the lack of Top-50 USHL point scorers to choose UNH. Player's from these past two recruiting classes combined for 13 Top-50 junior scoring seasons - eight in the QMJHL, two in the USHL and one each in the BCHL, the NAHL and USports. Guite, Gagnon & Oliver each have TWO Top-50 scoring seasons in the Q...
* This season saw Tournas (16th) and Guite (28th) post Top-50 QMJHL seasons, while Romeo (18th) and Hyles (50th) were Top-50 USHLers...
* Svartstrom was 5th in BCHL scoring during the 2024-25 season...

Now, here's where it gets interesting...

UNH Forward Recruits, 2018-2024:

This group includes all FORTY-SIX forward recruits during Mike Souza's first seven season's as head coach. For simplicities' sake, I'm not diving into which player's were recruited when. Undoubtedly, some players in this group would have been recruited before Souza's assistant tenure in Durham began. I believe Patrick Grasso (0.72 PPG / USHL) is one example that skews the numbers a bit, but its not THAT serious...

This collection of recruits includes 18 USHLers (39.1%), 11 BCHLers and 1 SHL U20 alum (26.1%), and 16 players who finished their pre-UNH careers in the NCDC, NAHL, EHL, AJHL or a US High School (34.8%). So under 40% from an elite junior circuit, though to be fair the BCHL was better then...

Just 16 of these 46 players posted pre-UNH seasons of 0.90 points per game or higher. Only two of those player's played in the USHL, while five played in the BCHL. The rest played tier three juniors or US High School hockey. The top three were all HS players and totaled at least 1.80 ppg, led by Ryan Black, who scored 2.25 points per game in his final season at the Winchendon School before heading to Babson. Only 34.8 percent of the forwards recruited in this era reached 0.90 ppg...

The 46 forward recruits over this seven-year span combined for 875 goals, 1180 assists and 2055 points in 2501 games. That's an average of 0.82 points per game...

Notes:
* The 0.82 PPG average likely skews high due to production in weaker leagues, as only 7 of 16 USHLers even managed to crack 0.60 points per game...
* Eight of these 46 players finished their college career with 80 points or more. Five of whom scored more than 0.90 in their final junior season, while three did not...
* Liam Devlin scored more than 80 points as a Wildcat, despite scoring at a rate of just 0.45 ppg in his final USHL season...
* Just one of these 46 players has scored 100 career points or better. One other will, almost certainly, join that club (Can anyone tell me what they have in common?)...
* Removing the three high school PPG totals (Black, Richels, Pierson) drops the overall PPG for this group to 0.77...

UNH Forward Recruits, 2014-2018:

Now let's look at the recruits from the four seasons prior to Souza's head coaching tenure. Though he was an assistant during the last three years of this sample, he recruited very few, if any, of these 17 forwards himself. Most would have been recruited by now MC head coach Scott Borek.

Nine of the 17 forwards in this sample played in the USHL or for the US NTDP (52.9%), three played in the BCHL (17.7), while three played in the EJHL and two played prep hockey (29.4%). Once again, the BCHL was a better league the further back one researches, so let's say anywhere between 52.9 and 70.6 percent of recruits played high level juniors...

Seven of 17, including two BCHLers and one USHLer scored at least 0.90 PPG. The remaining high scorers include three EJHLers and a CAN High Schooler. That makes 42.1 percent reaching the 0.90 PPG plateau...

This group combined for 421 goals, 519 assists and 940 points in 991 games, scoring at a rate of 0.95 PPG in their final seasons of junior hockey...

Notes:

* This group scored an identical PPG rate to the last two classes, but the number was skewed a bit by prep-schooler Warren Foegele's 2.06 PPG at St. Andrew's...
* Ironically, Tyler Kelleher DID NOT reach 0.90 PPG in his final junior season. He posted 41-43--84 in 100 US NTDP games played (0.84 PPG)...
* Michael McNicholas (BCHL) and Matt Willows (EJHL) each scored more than 80 career points for the Wildcats...
* Kelleher (USNTDP) and Grayson Downing (BCHL) each topped 100 career points...
* Andrew Poturalski (USHL) scored 81 career points and would have blown past 100, and I'd wager Foegele (17 UNH points) would have cracked the century mark too, had either played four years collegiately...

--

So, all that said, what do we see in the numbers?

It sure looks like recent UNH forward recruits are FAR more productive than their counterparts from the bulk of Souza's recruiting career, and far more in line with players committed at the end of Borek's tenure. Many more player's in the current group have done their scoring in a top junior league - certainly relative to Souza's previous targets, and perhaps even when compared to Borek's. So there is certainly a reason for optimism, but questions remain...

1) Will UNH's better recruiting results translate to the college level OR are all NCAA Hockey programs benefiting from a larger player pool? Has productivity changed relative to the competition or just to their predecessors?

2) How does the QMJHL - where UNH has found most of its newest recruits - compare to the OHL, WHL or previous iterations of the USHL? The Q is often cited as the weakest of the Canadian Junior Leagues? Is that stereotype or fact? Or variable? Is the CHL simply a higher scoring brand of hockey?

3) What do we make of last season's newcomer production? Many expected more scoring on the whole, and certainly from specific players. Yet, several of UNH's highest scoring forwards did not produce at a high level in their FR seasons. Even Jason Krog managed just 4 goals and 20 points as a frosh. Paul Thompson had 21 points over his first two seasons in Durham. Perhaps even 20 year old CHL freshman need learning curves?

4) Do the results of the last 8-12 seasons indicate the coaching staff has suffered from developmental issues or from lesser raw talent? Will more talent make them better coaches? Or, to paraphrase Dennis Green, are they who we thought they are?

5) The current recruiting sample is the only one of the three to combine for more goals than assists in their final junior season. Does UNH lack playmaking forwards? Are quality finishers potentially wasted by an inability to move pucks?

6) How will the defense and goaltending groups support what has - at least on paper - the potential to be the most dangerous group of forwards UNH has had in a long while?

--

tldr - UNH's recent forward recruits are scoring more in better leagues than those in previous classes...

And...post!
Wow. Impressive.

The recent commitments from Emile Guite and Ilya Kolmakov are noteworthy. Guite is an '07 and Kolmakov an '08. Both are Neutral Zone 4.25 rated according the Mike Lowry's twitter. The combination of age and rating is very unusual for UNH recruits. My guess is neither is coming in the fall, so their futures as UNH students likely are tied to Souza job security. Accordingly, my guess is we have about a 25% chance of ever seeing them. Hope I'm wrong.

Naturally, there's also the concern of either putting up big numbers next winter and getting poached by the elite programs. Naturally, it would be nice to know if either is getting NIL money and which programs were also recruiting them.

I wonder what has changed, if anything.
 
Last edited:
Kolmakov is almost certainly a pick up for next off season. I love his track record and apparent style of play. Sticking with the theme of PPG, he posted an otherworldly 2.49 PPG playing 16U for Little Caesar's in 24-25, before netting 13-35--48 (0.78 PPG) for Sherbrooke of the QMJHL this season. Lots of assists; he'll fit nicely with some of the more finisher oriented prospects UNH has added of late...

Without any inside information, I still believe (hope) there is a good chance Guité ends up in Durham this fall. More than anything else, I simply want him to come this season because I believe it benefits both present and future UNH Hockey. But there are also strong reasons for either side to see his immediate matriculation as crucial.

Souza's future at UNH is on the line. Forget loyalty, forget roster planning, he needs to win this season and Guité is a talent...

Guité scored 25-32--57 in 61 games as a 16 year old in Chicoutimi. Following that season, several outlets projected the possibility of him being selected as high as the second-round of the 2025 NHL Draft. He managed just 30 points in 59 games during his 17 year old season and eventually slipped to the fifth-round, where Anaheim grabbed him. Obviously, Guité rebounded this season posting more than a PPG and helping Chicoutimi to the Memorial Cup.

For Guité its primarily a question of development. Yes, he could stay in Chicoutimi and become the team's best player, while dominating the level, but to what end? One of the biggest 'knocks' or 'developmental avenues' listed in his scouting reports is his strength and physicality. I'd imagine he'd benefit tremendously from the college schedule and the weight room advantage that comes with.

Similar to prior Henriquez discussion, why does a player of that calibre choose UNH Hockey in its current state? Usually, because that offer is the one that allows the player to face the development jump/challenge immediately, as opposed to next off-season (Of course, you could say the same regarding Kolmakov and his early commitment to the Wildcats). With other rosters full, UNH agrees to take him now, whereas next season everyone would have room..?

It would seem a questionable decision on UNH's part (and a risky one for Souza), and an odd choice on Guité's part if his commitment was projected for 2027. For what its worth, the Heisenberg Spreadsheet currently as Guité as a 2026 and Kolmakov as a 2027. So here's hoping...

I guess we wait and see.
 
Last edited:
Just guessing, as of May 20, 2026...

Without adding Guité...
Svartstrom - Gagnon - Ring
Newcombe - Johnson - Tournas
Oliver - MacDonald - Lavins
Romeo - Van Tassell - Turner
Zebeski - Siedem - Hyles

With Guité addition...
Svartstrom - Ring - Tournas
Newcombe - Gagnon - Guité
Oliver - MacDonald - Lavins
Romeo - Van Tassell - Johnson
Zebeski
- Siedem - Hyles - Turner
 
Michigan, North Dakota, etc. get to do strategy #1. If you are UNH I think you need to do strategy #2. That means really good coaching, and maybe even line A plays water bug strategy and line B plays tree strategy and that is OK. That however means excellent teaching because what are you doing with a partial line change etc. How do you get your players to think the game they way you want them to?
Therein lies the rub, as The Bard might say. The next AD is unlikely to be old school paisan like the old Scarano/Umile combo that set Souza up to begin with, not will s/he be a novice cupcake pushover with no experience with the game like the current outgoing AD. Charm Offensive 2.0 won't be enough this time.

Without any inside information, I still believe (hope) there is a good chance Guité ends up in Durham this fall. More than anything else, I simply want him to come this season because I believe it benefits both present and future UNH Hockey. But there are also strong reasons for either side to see his immediate matriculation as crucial.

Souza's future at UNH is on the line. Forget loyalty, forget roster planning, he needs to win this season and Guité is a talent...

...

Similar to prior Henriquez discussion, why does a player of that calibre choose UNH Hockey in its current state? Usually, because that offer is the one that allows the player to face the development jump/challenge immediately, as opposed to next off-season (Of course, you could say the same regarding Kolmakov and his early commitment to the Wildcats). With other rosters full, UNH agrees to take him now, whereas next season everyone would have room..?

It would seem a questionable decision on UNH's part (and a risky one for Souza), and an odd choice on Guité's part if his commitment was projected for 2027. For what its worth, the Heisenberg Spreadsheet currently as Guité as a 2026 and Kolmakov as a 2027. So here's hoping...

I guess we wait and see.
Agree 100%.

Naturally, there's also the concern of either putting up big numbers next winter and getting poached by the elite programs. Naturally, it would be nice to know if either is getting NIL money and which programs were also recruiting them.
Yes and Yes

I wonder what has changed, if anything.
My bet remains that it begins and ends mostly with TDL. Someone putting that kind of money into a facility, and attaching his branding as well, you'd logically think to get the "bang for his buck", he'd like to give more people the opportunity to see that branding, and associate hoped-for winning hockey that follows with his burgeoning career, in business and in politics as well. TDL has reached the legacy stage of his life, and while I hope in the long run the donor pool is deeper than just the one ... look at what UMaine has done with "just the one" with Alfond. It all boils down to whether the current HC can rise to the occasion? If he doesn't, then TDL can create a position for his erstwhile bestie in the Key Auto Group empire, I'm sure ... he's not going to blindly back his pal if MS7 can't put a winning product out on the ice to justify TDL's investments. Simples.
 
Looks like Makar is out for Game One tonight, but Malinski (sp?) might be back. So we wait to see if Gagne dresses for Game One of the WCF, we'll see shortly ...
 
Back
Top