If the point is that some cases of Myocarditis occurred, yes, that was always acknowledged by the CDC
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...-vaccines.html
What You Need to Know
Benefits of Vaccination Outweigh the Risks
Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely rare following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. The
benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the known and potential risks.
Did the benefits of vaccination truly outweigh the risks? Not necessarily, according to Dr. Makary's Point #4:
Misinformation #4: Myocarditis from the vaccine is less common than from the infection
Public health officials
downplayed concerns about vaccine-induced myocarditis — or inflammation of the heart muscle.
They cited poorly designed studies that under-captured complication rates.
A flurry of well-designed studies said the opposite.
We now know that myocarditis is
six to 28 times more common after the COVID vaccine than after the infection among 16- to 24-year-old males.
Tens of thousands of children
likely got myocarditis, mostly subclinical, from
a COVID vaccine they did not need because they were entirely healthy or because they already had COVID.
But that's a nuance when its much easier to assert that the vaccine is the cause of any random death, and that the Media was silencing facts.
So let me ask you then, 'Watcher ... do you think Hearns made it up? If so, what was his motive? He's not exactly been the publicity-seeking sort, neither during his career nor (especially) in its aftermath. Ditto Hagler, which is probably why the two became close friends in retirement. Jeez, Marv was virtually living in the shadow of Storyland NH when he passed!! Maybe he worked the Bamboo Chutes during the summer as a retirement job?? ;-)
It's a very curious thing to do, if you lose a close friend, to go running your mouth for no good reason, as opposed to having very real concerns about a perceived risk to others that seems to have been quashed by Big Brother, I'm sure you would agree? Or, do you think he was trying to drum up publicity for Hearns-Leonard III or Hearns-Duran II?? Did you find it distateful OR completely justified how MSM and "fact-checkers" who have since been thoroughly discredited (or exposed by Matt Taibbi via the Twitter Files) descended like locusts to cancel Hearns when he had the temerity to challenge the prevailing propaganda-laced narrative???
Sorry if this may not be the time or place to go over old business, but to some of us, the giveaway that folks in positions of authority were talking out of their posteriors was when they never could come up with a good answer on why natural immunity should be a "thing", when we had only, oh, I dunno ... a 2,500 year head start on how it's applied in past situations.
But looking on the good side, hey, if you hold/held Pfizer stock, it wasn't a total loss ... ;-)
