willythekid
New member
Re: UND @ SCSU: Didn't People Used To Protest This Series?
the wording from rule 6-18:
A goal shall not be allowed if the puck has been kicked or directed into
the goal off an attacking player’s skate or any body part. When in doubt,
goal shall be disallowed. A goal shall be allowed if a puck deflects off an
attacking player who is in the act of stopping. When administering this rule,
the puck must initially be legally propelled by a stick
If anything this kick falls under "when in doubt", which means the refs made the correct call. WCHA refs seldom do that.
After further review.....
The goal with :31 left in the third looks like it actually should have counted. Hanowski indeed did kick it, but it hit his own stick and deflects in. If I can get the side angle video I will post. Here is a video that shows the view from above at about :57. Highlights.
It's the way it goes. Still a great weekend of hockey. We had plenty of other chances to tie the game and just couldn't get it done.
the wording from rule 6-18:
A goal shall not be allowed if the puck has been kicked or directed into
the goal off an attacking player’s skate or any body part. When in doubt,
goal shall be disallowed. A goal shall be allowed if a puck deflects off an
attacking player who is in the act of stopping. When administering this rule,
the puck must initially be legally propelled by a stick
If anything this kick falls under "when in doubt", which means the refs made the correct call. WCHA refs seldom do that.