USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
- Thread starter UMLFan
- Start date
UMLHockey224
GregM
I'm excited for this series and I'm all the way out here in CO springs lol
Enjoy what winterfest has to offer ... Then go into the game.... Or just meet Monty at beerworks ... And enjoy the warmth of his company(if that's at all possible)
UML Puck Hawk
New member
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
45 students on the bus tomorrow. Considering it was 6 Tuesday morning pretty solid number
45 students on the bus tomorrow. Considering it was 6 Tuesday morning pretty solid number
USrevs2014
New member
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
looking for two tickets for tonight but not trying to pay $100+ that they have been listed for on stubhub... anyone have any extras?
looking for two tickets for tonight but not trying to pay $100+ that they have been listed for on stubhub... anyone have any extras?
UMLHockey224
GregM
Great to see that the students are still wanting to go to the away games! Go UML! Be proud be loud ... And mildly respectful lol
BostonSoccerDad
New member
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
Really looking forward to this series. It will be good to see how well the Riverhawks can rise to the challenge against the #1 team. My wife bought tickets in December as a birthday gift for me for Saturday night's game. She is a BC Alum and I am a ULowell alum from the 80s. We are bringing two of our daughters who are having a tough time figuring out which jersey they will wear. If either of them want a ride to/from the game, they better be wearing their Lowell colors!
Really looking forward to this series. It will be good to see how well the Riverhawks can rise to the challenge against the #1 team. My wife bought tickets in December as a birthday gift for me for Saturday night's game. She is a BC Alum and I am a ULowell alum from the 80s. We are bringing two of our daughters who are having a tough time figuring out which jersey they will wear. If either of them want a ride to/from the game, they better be wearing their Lowell colors!
UMLHockey224
GregM
Good man ! Should both be pretty exciting games
riverchief1
Well-known member
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
Well that was fun. Let's hope for a different result tomorrow night.
At least we can thank Maine and Northeastern for tying tonight, thus allowing UML to remain alone in second place.
Well that was fun. Let's hope for a different result tomorrow night.
At least we can thank Maine and Northeastern for tying tonight, thus allowing UML to remain alone in second place.
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
They need to find a way to generate more offense on Saturday night. Demko was leaving rebounds tonight but the Hawks didn't take advantage.
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
Didn't seem to be much urgency tonight. Seemed like we played not to make mistakes instead to make something happen The 5 minute major was embarrassing. Chapie made a bonehead play to set up BC's first goal. We had some real nice chances but it also seemed like we hit Demko square in the gut 20 times and like bblav said we didn't have a body in front when he gave up rebounds.
Didn't seem to be much urgency tonight. Seemed like we played not to make mistakes instead to make something happen The 5 minute major was embarrassing. Chapie made a bonehead play to set up BC's first goal. We had some real nice chances but it also seemed like we hit Demko square in the gut 20 times and like bblav said we didn't have a body in front when he gave up rebounds.
Last edited:
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
I couldn't tell how that first one got in. It looked like Conner was in good position.
It got in because of the boneheaded play.
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
Bob Ellis said the same thing. He didn't think that Lowell erally played all that well, but he was impressed they were still able to stay in the game playing that way.
FiveHole12
Registered User
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
Most folks see this play and pass it off as a fluke goal. Anyone that sees Johnny play every night knows this is not so. Frickin' incredible what this kid can do with the puck... he brought me out of my seat yet again, with the typical, 'Holy chit! Did you see that?'
Goalie was in good position. Gaudreau fired at a little hole between shoulder and post. Almost like Johnny curved it in there because he was behind the goal line and puck was on the goal line when he shot. He hit the far post and puck deflected in.
Most folks see this play and pass it off as a fluke goal. Anyone that sees Johnny play every night knows this is not so. Frickin' incredible what this kid can do with the puck... he brought me out of my seat yet again, with the typical, 'Holy chit! Did you see that?'
Re: UML 2013/2014 Season, II ... May I have another?
Might have bounced off Connors side, wasn't a good angle to shoot. Sad thing was that Chapie had skated the puck into BC's zone and probably could have skated around the bc net or taken a shot or at least dumped it further in but instead stopped cold and tried to pass it backwards. Got intercepted just outside of our blue line and set up a 2 man rush which Gaudreau took all the way. More random observations: Lowel got beat bad in toughness, hits and working the boards. Colantone, McGrath, Pendenza and Campbell played gritty but our defense especially looked tentative and slow. Lot's of coasting around. Gaudreau is sneaky, always seems to be open and was really disruptive when Lowell had the puck. Couldn't believe how slight he is, wish we could get a big hit on him. Mcgrath could level him I bet. Was surprised to find the BC crowd to be a little weak. % of people really paying attention seemed low. I expect Tsongas to be much more rockin tonight, especially if the team shows some heart.
Might have bounced off Connors side, wasn't a good angle to shoot. Sad thing was that Chapie had skated the puck into BC's zone and probably could have skated around the bc net or taken a shot or at least dumped it further in but instead stopped cold and tried to pass it backwards. Got intercepted just outside of our blue line and set up a 2 man rush which Gaudreau took all the way. More random observations: Lowel got beat bad in toughness, hits and working the boards. Colantone, McGrath, Pendenza and Campbell played gritty but our defense especially looked tentative and slow. Lot's of coasting around. Gaudreau is sneaky, always seems to be open and was really disruptive when Lowell had the puck. Couldn't believe how slight he is, wish we could get a big hit on him. Mcgrath could level him I bet. Was surprised to find the BC crowd to be a little weak. % of people really paying attention seemed low. I expect Tsongas to be much more rockin tonight, especially if the team shows some heart.
Last edited:
