What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UML '09/'10 Season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

I honestly have no idea what to expect of this team tonight.

I have to leave before the 3rd- L'il has a game. I wonder about going as each period brings new surprises and only the 3rd seems to count.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

This is just way too reminscent of last year (yes, we've won games during the span unlike last year). More just talking about offense.

Since and including November 24th (loss at Providence), Lowell has played 11 games. They're 4-6-1 in that span. In the 7 games that Lowell didn't win ... they scored a combined 11 goals, three times scoring just once, and four times twice. In those games, they've only given up 18 goals. So just like the lack of offense really was a major component in not making the NCAAs last year (during that period) ... it could affect this team again this season. The offense just isn't the there consistently.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

Anyone else notice that when Blaise is getting interviewed he is not mad at how we played like he was earlier in the year when we lost?
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

Anyone else notice that when Blaise is getting interviewed he is not mad at how we played like he was earlier in the year when we lost?
I'll flat out admit I haven't heard any of the post-game interviews. But I'm guessing that he's more accepting (if possible) of a loss when the team plays well and loses than games like PC earlier this season.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

I honestly have no idea what to expect of this team tonight.
A lot riding on this game for both teams. After letting the game slip away from them last night, I hope they're ****ed off and come out on fire. I would like to see a smart physical game from the Hawks. They need to break the habit of playing large portions of the game/period shorthanded. Work hard, crash the net and get the PP going tonight.

The Hawks can't afford to lose this one.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

This is just way too reminscent of last year (yes, we've won games during the span unlike last year). More just talking about offense.

Since and including November 24th (loss at Providence), Lowell has played 11 games. They're 4-6-1 in that span. In the 7 games that Lowell didn't win ... they scored a combined 11 goals, three times scoring just once, and four times twice. In those games, they've only given up 18 goals. So just like the lack of offense really was a major component in not making the NCAAs last year (during that period) ... it could affect this team again this season. The offense just isn't the there consistently.

This season:
12-2-1 when they score 3 or more goals.
0-6-1 when they score 2 goals or less.

For comparison, last season:
17-4-2 when they score 3 or more goals.
3-12-0 when they score 2 goals or less.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

I'll flat out admit I haven't heard any of the post-game interviews. But I'm guessing that he's more accepting (if possible) of a loss when the team plays well and loses than games like PC earlier this season.

I have to wonder if he's lowered his expectations and thus is cushioning the blow... then again, the way he runs his holistic approach he can't snap and turn into a "results only" type of hard line coach.

This is a team that can do great things... the whole purpose of striving for perfection and working on technique is to win games. You know what though... losing matters, winning matters and anything less than hard effort to win is not acceptable. Technique gets you there but that's because effort is assumed... you step out there and you put out your best effort. You make the other guy's life hell, frustrate them, wear them down, scare them offensively... you do everything you can to do those things. But effort is assumed. I'd like to hear the coach be angrier... this is unacceptable and the players have to take it on themselves... where are the leaders on this team... who in that room is saying "this is garbage... we can do better, we will do better".

I suppose I'm getting frustrated from afar... if i were at the rink tonight I'd have a hard time not lighting into our own guys. I'd just like to see some resolve out of the team. Fail, screw up, fine... but don't go down without a fight.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

I'm thinking of sending an e-mail to the appropriate staff... each and every UMass fan who shouts out a certain 7 letter expletive should be thrown out of the building.

----

As for this game that's winding down... why should I even bother commenting?
 
Last edited:
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

The same old story tonight, no goal scoring and stupid penalties, other than that the team played well. Talk about gift wrapping a game for Amherst with the penalties at the end. I'm not sure how many healthy bodies Blaise has sitting in the stands, but there are a few guys that should be sitting next weekend for taking bad penalties over the past few games.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

The same old story tonight, no goal scoring and stupid penalties, other than that the team played well. Talk about gift wrapping a game for Amherst with the penalties at the end. I'm not sure how many healthy bodies Blaise has sitting in the stands, but there are a few guys that should be sitting next weekend for taking bad penalties over the past few games.

I want a written apology from Budd for all of his stupid penalties over the past 4 or 5 games.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

The same old story tonight, no goal scoring and stupid penalties, other than that the team played well. Talk about gift wrapping a game for Amherst with the penalties at the end. I'm not sure how many healthy bodies Blaise has sitting in the stands, but there are a few guys that should be sitting next weekend for taking bad penalties over the past few games.

This pretty much is a summation of where the River Hawks have been for years. Last night, they dominated the play of the Minuteman for most of that game, yet, only got a single goal to show for it. Say what you want about the disallowed goal changing the game, it did. The River Hawks didn't have that same edge afterward. Amherst scores the next goal on an awful defensive play and Lowell couldn't find the net except for a nice play in the second to tie the game. Amherst was 1/7 on the PP but Lowell was 0/5. I'm focusing more on the zero on the PP for Lowell than referee's calls.

The bottom line is this...the River Hawks and Amherst were tied 1-1 after two periods of both games over the weekend. The River Hawks had every chance in each of the third periods to take points from those games but found ways to lose (no matter what the method). Lowell is the team that according to the pundits at the beginning of the year have the talent to take this type of game. They certainly have not shown this since the 3rd period of the UNH game in November. I'm tired of hearing the referees are awful or DII small sister excuse, why bother saving the team in 2007 if resigned to this. If you score goals and know what it takes to win, you don't have a problems with penalties or wins most of the time. This is something the River Hawks haven't done consistently over a season in over 15 years.

I actually agree with the previous poster, I think it is time for a few people to sit and let another person take his place. Let's be honest, unless they run the table for the rest of the season, the regular season title and an NCAA at-large berth is gone from a team that was expected to be there. While now more difficult, the River Hawks still have a good chance of securing home ice advantage for the first round of the playoffs. In some ways, I hope it gives them more incentive considering that they are just two points away from a tie for sixth place, with a game in hand against BU but more importantly, UVM has a game on us. The Amherst sweep will cost Lowell a full seed at the end of the season. Now instead of Northeastern or Merrimack coming to town, it may be Vermont or BU coming to town.

With two more games against Maine, and three against Boston College, the River Hawks have a difficult but doable road to lock up a #3 or #4 seed in Hockey East. Two games at home vs. Merrimack and Boston College that are must wins. Otherwise, our home ice prospects are going to be endangered.

Watching this team (for the long haul) is like the movie Groundhog Day, seeing the same story play out over and over again. The problem with this is that the coaching staff (and deservingly so) is going to catch a lot of heat from supporters and fans if this upcoming weekend snowballs for the River Hawks.
 
Last edited:
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

they done, no way they even get home ice,.

Are you retarded? Lowell sits 5th in the league, one spot behind the final home ice spot. They are only 3 points behind a Maine team who is going to struggle with Darling hurt, and the fact that they aren't as deep as Lowell and others. As a UMass fan, I like the fact that we sit in third, but I am waiting for the inevitable fall on the face towards the end of the season, which will push them down substantially. Lowell just needs to find a way to win, and most likely take at least 3 points next weekend and hope teams like UMass and Vermont don't start winning. Another bad weekend for Maine, and a good one of you next weekend and the River Hawks have a home ice spot for that moment. You may not be looking at a regular season title, but home ice and a trip to the Garden again are def. not out of reach.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

Are you retarded? Lowell sits 5th in the league, one spot behind the final home ice spot. They are only 3 points behind a Maine team who is going to struggle with Darling hurt, and the fact that they aren't as deep as Lowell and others. As a UMass fan, I like the fact that we sit in third, but I am waiting for the inevitable fall on the face towards the end of the season, which will push them down substantially. Lowell just needs to find a way to win, and most likely take at least 3 points next weekend and hope teams like UMass and Vermont don't start winning. Another bad weekend for Maine, and a good one of you next weekend and the River Hawks have a home ice spot for that moment. You may not be looking at a regular season title, but home ice and a trip to the Garden again are def. not out of reach.

You just gave away yout hand. looks like you have more confidence in Lowell than you do your own team, Guess you feel Umass isnt legit. Just lucky
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

You just gave away yout hand. looks like you have more confidence in Lowell than you do your own team, Guess you feel Umass isnt legit. Just lucky
He's a lowell fan...kind of

UMass has always fallen flat in December and January they have played pretty well in Feb and March. I think this team finally gets it and the determination to succeed has shown
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

Are you retarded? Lowell sits 5th in the league, one spot behind the final home ice spot. They are only 3 points behind a Maine team who is going to struggle with Darling hurt, and the fact that they aren't as deep as Lowell and others. As a UMass fan, I like the fact that we sit in third, but I am waiting for the inevitable fall on the face towards the end of the season, which will push them down substantially. Lowell just needs to find a way to win, and most likely take at least 3 points next weekend and hope teams like UMass and Vermont don't start winning. Another bad weekend for Maine, and a good one of you next weekend and the River Hawks have a home ice spot for that moment. You may not be looking at a regular season title, but home ice and a trip to the Garden again are def. not out of reach.

Its out of this team's reach as long as they play as they have. I really need to sit down and watch the next home game... it really boggles my mind that we've lost so much since our run at the end of last year. Most of that run was based off of very smart play and confident passing. How can you forget how to play intelligently? Where is that team that could skate with any team in the nation?

The major issue is that this team should be comfortably within contention for an at-large NCAA bid and not having to depend upon a hot streak. We're buying into the whole idea that "every team is tough"... it embraces mediocrity... if every team is tough then, logically, we shouldn't do all that well. I don't think UNH or BC embraces that idea. They expect to go out and win and its demanded that they do so. Hell, its their tradition... the cultural expectation is that the group on the ice will be for the continued glory of their programs so you have to do all things a little harder because its expected.
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

Definately the season for lowered expectations...

We should maybe stop talking conference and national titles and just enjoy the games one at a time. I don't see this team doing as well as last year, but I think they will still make some plays that will be fun to watch.

I was especially dissapointed last night when amherst got the 5 on 3 and took a time out, and blaise said nothing to the players during the whole thing. Maybe the lack of leadership isnt the captains...
 
Re: UML '09/'10 Season Thread

This pretty much is a summation of where the River Hawks have been for years. Last night, they dominated the play of the Minuteman for most of that game, yet, only got a single goal to show for it. Say what you want about the disallowed goal changing the game, it did. The River Hawks didn't have that same edge afterward. Amherst scores the next goal on an awful defensive play and Lowell couldn't find the next except for a nice play in the second to tie the game. Amherst was 1/7 on the PP but Lowell was 0/5. I'm focusing more on the zero on the PP for Lowell than referee's calls.

Do you realize you're contradicting yourself here? The disallowed goal came 69 seconds into the game and UML still dominated play. Really wouldn't say it changed the game. Lowell had their chances. Missed a breakaway, missed numerous open nets or just didn't get good wood and the puck lazily floated to Dainton* who had time to recover and make a save. Lowell lost this game because they took too many stupid penalties (looking at you Michael Budd), and because Ryan Blair skates as well as Kim Brandvold did, which to say, is not very good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top