Re: UMass Lowell 2014-2015 Season: The March to March
It's a perfect built-in excuse.
When elite programs get the top young recruits they ooooh and ahhhh about "blue chip" this and "top recruiting class" that. The second they lose to a team with older players they trip over themselves to point out how much older the other roster is, like suddenly having young players is a handicap and they courageously choose to only have 18 year old freshman because it's "the right way".
It might be amusing if it wasn't so obviously pathetic.
From the BC thread:
"& the goalie is about a decade younger than half of UML's roster"
Whoa! They have an 11 to 14 year old kid playing out there? I had no idea Demko was so young!
If Doogie Howser can't handle the game out there, maybe they should get someone a bit older? An upper classmen in high school maybe?
Sorry the age thing people remark about always cracks me up.
It's a perfect built-in excuse.
When elite programs get the top young recruits they ooooh and ahhhh about "blue chip" this and "top recruiting class" that. The second they lose to a team with older players they trip over themselves to point out how much older the other roster is, like suddenly having young players is a handicap and they courageously choose to only have 18 year old freshman because it's "the right way".
It might be amusing if it wasn't so obviously pathetic.