One issue with any rankings of college hockey recruits is the idea of what you are ranking.
In football or basketball, for the big programs, it's simple. Everyone is recruiting high school seniors, and whoever brings in the most talented high school seniors, that's the best recruiting class. Now, granted, the transfer portal is more important than ever so in figuring out who will be a better team you need to factor that in, but by and large the most talented incoming freshman class = the highest ranking.
Hockey recruiting rankings seem to follow the same logic. The highest rated classes are generally full of 18 or 19 year old kids who are draft eligible, and hope to play a year or two and then go pro. However, that's not necessarily the best path to actually win college hockey games. No recruiting class with 21 or 22 year old undrafted finished products is going to be ranked very highly. But that team may win more games than the young, high upside team, especially when those players find that upside in the NHL or AHL.
And, at the end of the day, who is ranking these guys? Who actually has laid eyes on the Nadeaus in the BCHL, the top USHL guys down in Texas, the Massachusetts and Minnesota prep kids, AND the Swedish kids playing for professional clubs' junior teams? Outside of the most plugged in NHL scouts, no one.
I think we can both be excited that there are talented kids coming in AND take wherever the recruiting rankings are with a grain of salt.