Re: UAH Hockey 2011-12: Will Someone Break the Conference Logjam? Thanks.
And got off the bus and played 2 games of Division I college hockey with two more scheduled the next week? We bussed straight thru from Marquette to Daytona Beach with two drivers, but that was for spring break. There is also a difference, budgetary concerns aside, of what is possible to do, and what you wish to do. There also are differences from what the person who doesn't travel with their team on regular basis perceives, and what those who do travel know. I had a guy from the Soo tell me it's a 2 1/2 hour trip to Marquette, when I've made that trip by bus a half dozen times and usually coming in around 3 hours, with as much as 4 1/2 because of weather. He didn't take into account that the bus can't fly 70 mph hour down M-28 and does slow down for Seney and Shingleton and stop for every railroad track. Here's a concern, you can drive straight thru, around 20 hrs worth, get to Huntsville and have a skate, of course you will get very little accomplished at that skate because everyone is worn out from the travel, then all you have is 50 minutes of ice on game day. Have a skate along the way? You'll hit Chicago around 3 am and Indy around 6 local time. Can you get ice in Louisville? These are things that come up.
I guess then, the question is, does NMU actually
want to be D-I in hockey?
As I look at NMU's schedule *, there were no flights this season, correct? Last year, there was one (Alaska); they year before one (Alaska); none in '08-'09; and one (Alaska again) the year prior. Compare that to, say, Bemidji State. This year, it's 3 flights (DU, CC and UAA); last year (the first in the WCHA) it was 1 (DU). That was a massive improvement over the CHA days, when BSU had this: '09-'10 - 4 flights (UAH, Niagara, RMU and UAH); '08-'09 was 5 flights (UAH, Niagara, RMU, RMU (no, not double counting, it was RMU twice on the road in three weeks), and Niagara - yep, again). Not only that, but that was the Frozen 4 year...; '07-'08 was 5 (UAH, Wayne State, Niagara, UAH, RMU).
So, to sum up, NMU has had an average of 0.6 flights a year for the last 5, and BSU has had an average of 3.6.
Again - does NMU want to play D-I hockey or pinch pennies and drop the sport? I understand that college budgets have taken a massive hit over the last few years, but the reality of playing D-I athletics demands that the money to play at a realistic level is maintained. What does that mean in this argument? NMU (and Tech and FSU) will have to fly to Alaska, UAA and likely UAH if they are added to the conference. As Shirtless points out, there is a way to "only" double NMU's flight travel budget most years (in conference anyway) and occasionally triple it **. Is it impossible to make up that difference - especially if UAH does kick in a travel subsidy *** ? There is your question. If the answer is "no," than maybe NMU should look at joining whatever conference Finlandia is in and bus to every game.
* - I decided to go conference games only
** - and it should be pointed out that while there are extra flights, there are fewer bus trips. In other-words, let's say that a bus trip costs "X" and a flight "Y," the added cost isn't Y, it's Y-X
*** - what about UAA and UAF's subsidy?