What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UAA recruits

Re: UAA recruits

Quote copied from Coach Thomas twitter feed:

"Want to congratulate our 4 seniors on graduating today. Great work men @Tatchy9 @AustinSevalrud @Leask22 @cwills37"

Good for them! Not an easy task when some of them played in the ECHL while still getting their degree.
 
Re: UAA recruits

Caps pfft, Predators!! Force game 7, they're all over the place.
In my opinion Ege was our best player.
We sure got an avalanche of new guys coming in.
 
Caps pfft, Predators!! Force game 7, they're all over the place.
In my opinion Ege was our best player.
We sure got an avalanche of new guys coming in.

During the first half of the season I agree Ege was one of the better players, but not during the second half. The fire just wasn't there, and I spoke with numerous other fans who felt the same way. He wasn't happy with the Ice Dogs, nor UAA. I hope he finds that perfect fit he's looking for.
 
Re: UAA recruits

If he plays pro hockey, is he only gonna play in Minnesota? That is a soft excuse, if you choose to call it an excuse. But yeah good luck to him.

I understand your point; but, on the other hand, these really are kids. Some will thrive/develop socially faster/better far away from their family friends. Others need a more gradual transition. Give the kid some credit - he tried moving far from home, wasn't for him. That doesn't necessarily mean that he wouldn't be able to transition later on/after a few more years closer to home. Everyone is different. However, yes, if you are a pro team, that's something worth considering when you are drafting.
 
Re: UAA recruits

Haven't seen the twins for quite some time.
Being a year older assume their coordination and skill set are improved. They had good coordination and skills before so they should be a very welcome addition to the Seawolves.
Wondering if they have added any height?
I would guess they have added muscle.
Just random thoughts.
 
Re: UAA recruits

I used to watch the twins play in Junior hockey, definitely will help a great deal on the PP that is where their strengths shine through. They know instinctively where each other are on the ice and use each other effectively, having played together and on the same line since minor hockey helped with that one.
 
Re: UAA recruits


&

Yup, I got that. But I don't think they are going to be doing any more growing at their ages. ???

My last growth "spurt" was the summer I turned 21. Grew a 1/2 inch to help court this woman who was 5'10, still half a foot shorter :o

I'll add that some of my male bros have had a "second puberty" from 18-25, nothing big just an inch or two and filling out their bodies.
 
Last edited:
Re: UAA recruits

Copied from a News Miner article:

"A single, system-wide accreditation wouldn’t necessarily mean all the athletic teams at UAA and UAF would have to merge, but it could very likely mean some of them would be eliminated or reduced, according to Johnsen."

Just my thought:
Perhaps the Regents meeting in June will give some insight into this.
 
Re: UAA recruits

Copied from a News Miner article:

"A single, system-wide accreditation wouldn’t necessarily mean all the athletic teams at UAA and UAF would have to merge, but it could very likely mean some of them would be eliminated or reduced, according to Johnsen."

Just my thought:
Perhaps the Regents meeting in June will give some insight into this.

The Newsminer quote before that one is "Johnsen said he understands the important role intercollegiate athletics play in community engagement and university atmosphere, but also said he needs to think about the usefulness of costly programs during tough fiscal times."

Teams may not have to merge to one campus, but I don't get the feeling that there will be two teams in any sport, even the high profile sports. Understandably, Johnsen doesn't know what single institution accreditation means for academics, much less athletics. He'll be fairly guarded on any public comments until they learn more about the impact. He doesn't need a bunch of vocal Seawolve or Nanook fans making this more about sports than academics. Athletics will be collateral damage.
 
Re: UAA recruits

The Newsminer quote before that one is "Johnsen said he understands the important role intercollegiate athletics play in community engagement and university atmosphere, but also said he needs to think about the usefulness of costly programs during tough fiscal times."

Teams may not have to merge to one campus, but I don't get the feeling that there will be two teams in any sport, even the high profile sports. Understandably, Johnsen doesn't know what single institution accreditation means for academics, much less athletics. He'll be fairly guarded on any public comments until they learn more about the impact. He doesn't need a bunch of vocal Seawolve or Nanook fans making this more about sports than academics. Athletics will be collateral damage.

The State of Alaska already has the worst University system of all 50 states. By. A. Long. Shot. When effing Wyoming and Idaho can accomplish more in terms of sports than Alaska it's pretty pathetic. Sure, Alaska is a huge state with a small population and should be expected to be pretty low among the 50 states regardless of the comparisons you make in University (academic or athletic). But the difference is that the State of Alaska has $52,805,000,000.00 that's FIFTY-TWO Billion, EIGHT-HUNDRED and FIVE Million dollars.

If you stacked 53b in one dollar bills, the stack would reach nearly 3400 miles above the Earth's surface. You could buy EIGHTEEN-THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED and SIXTEEN brand new effing Corvettes for just ONE BILLION. A person given $1,000,000,000 wouldn't be able to spend it in their lifetime on common consumer goods. It would take 49 years+ of just buying an effing Corvette EVERY DAY to spend a BILLION.

It's more of the continuing BS song and dance by the Alaska Knuckledragging Legislature to convince the common citizenry that the joint is broke. I'll happily admit that the yearly budgetary numbers are down and that some of the hand-wringing isn't ridiculous. There's no immediate revenue stream to replace the lost oil revenues. No doubt about it. Oh wait, except for the 52b in the savings account. Which typically grows at 2 billion a year and that is quite interestingly about the shortfall that the knuckledraggers are all whinging about. This is all about nothing less than the powers-that-be (the status quo power brokers) consolidating their hold on power by keeping the sheep in the dark as to reality. Fiscal conservative is an effing oxymoron these twats throw around to scare people because a scared electorate votes for the person that scared them.

There are myriad ways in which one can creatively utilize $53b dollars without existing infrastructure, social programs and/or universities taking any hits to their budgets. Small minded, petty and corrupt politicians are not capable of such thinking. So the result will be some effed up nonsense from a semi-incompetent middle level bureaucrat who's primary interest is to satiate the knuckledraggers? Eff that noise. Students, Faculty, Staff and neighbors of the Universities in Alaska should be out picketing; but they won't be. They're too locked into the false paradigm they've been programmed with for the last 30 years.

Alaska governance is an effing joke and they're turning the higher education system into a pathetic smelly one-holer.
 
Back
Top