What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

I could negotiate gun regulations, if, as Kep has posited for other political footballs, there'd be some give and take between the sides.

Want to make every exchange of ownership of a weapon have to go through an FFL. Great.
But, as a licensed concealed carry holder*, allow me to have full, nationwide reciprocity just like my driver's license.

One is taking away nothing from anyone who isn't already law abiding. The other takes away the right of a city/state to enforce their own gun laws and I'm guessing you're a proponent of states having their own rights in every case except this.

How so?
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

One is taking away nothing from anyone who isn't already law abiding. The other takes away the right of a city/state to enforce their own gun laws and I'm guessing you're a proponent of states having their own rights in every case except this.

Yup, but that's gone already with full driver's license reciprocity. Federal highway funds are a powerful somethingoranother.
 
Last edited:
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

The odds of it getting stolen are much, much greater than the odds of anyone needing it for some Old West-style shootout over their 60" TV.
In how many of those cases was the gun locked in a safe? Like I said, I was talking about a theoretical world where only people of above average intelligence own guns and handle them accordingly.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

I prefer to not leave a firearm in a vehicle. It's too easily stolen.

Unless it's behind a lock that only I know the combo to*, I want to be able to feel it. Given that, sure, maybe "burr", but I believe a good, safe, smart one.


* 59, 63, 80, 82, 87, 97, 00, 16. ;)

If you weren't a stupid hawks fan, I would have guessed your birth year, your wife's, college graduation, your first kid, your second kid, third kid?, no clue, retirement
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

:rolleyes:

If it's not in the vault I want to know where it is.

I'm sorry that I can't smell it or hear it or taste it when it's with me. And heavens if I continually see it because someone else might and then it's not concealed and ergo I'm violating the law.

It's like the old knife safety rule: If it's not in your hand, it's in the block.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

I fail to see the link between intelligence and safety. Are most serial killers of below average intelligence?
Well there are certainly different types of intelligence so I get where you're coming from there. In this case what I mean by intelligence is they know what proper gun safety is and exercise it. In that scenario, do you think the world would be safer?

My point is that most of the issues with guns stem from people being stupid. Their kid finds the gun and it winds up at school, it gets stolen because they're dumb and it's not locked up, they shoot themselves in the foot etc.

If you're arguing that a very small percentage of smart highly dangerous people might still get guns in this scenario and society would still be less safe then I disagree but get what you're saying.
 
Last edited:
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Well there are certainly different types of intelligence so I get where you're coming from there. In this case what I mean by intelligence is they know what proper gun safety is and exercise it. In that scenario, do you think the world would be safer?

My point is that most of the issues with guns stem from people being stupid. Their kid finds the gun and it winds up at school, it gets stolen because they're dumb and it's not locked up, they shoot themselves in the foot etc.

If you're arguing that a very small percentage of smart highly dangerous people might still get guns in this scenario and society would still be less safe then I disagree but get what you're saying.

No, I'm more of the belief that guns just plain aren't safe. Someone may practice great gun safety up until the day they get into a fight with their spouse and end up getting out their gun and shooting them. Is their a chance that they would simply stab them or strangle them instead? Sure, it's possible, but guns provide enough separation that people are more comfortable with firing a gun at someone than they would be to stab or strangle them.

I've said before I'm for a ban and a buy back program (I'd be willing to consider limited exemptions to the ban). I just think we have proven as a society that we can't handle the responsibility that comes with the privilege. Sometimes it's necessary to take the toys away.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

No, I'm more of the belief that guns just plain aren't safe. Someone may practice great gun safety up until the day they get into a fight with their spouse and end up getting out their gun and shooting them. Is their a chance that they would simply stab them or strangle them instead? Sure, it's possible, but guns provide enough separation that people are more comfortable with firing a gun at someone than they would be to stab or strangle them.
Fair enough and I suppose all the background checks and preventative measures in the world can't always prevent that type of thing from happening. In my ideal world getting a gun would be far more rigorous and inconvenient.

Sometimes it's necessary to take the toys away.
This is what I mostly disagree with. It's the same type of crap logic kindergarten teachers, bosses, and other simpletons employ that make society a worse place. In the case of guns I can kinda see the reasoning behind this argument but that logic really irks me. (note I don't think you're a simpleton I just really hate when people employ that logic)
 
Last edited:
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

She Seems Nice

Just remember though Trump doesn't support any of this...they certainly support him though. "I Voted For Trump!" is the new rallying cry for the Idiotic Entitled White People...

She should say those things in worse neighborhoods and see how they react to her choice for President while calling them "animals" :rolleyes:
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

I fail to see the link between intelligence and safety. Are most serial killers of below average intelligence?

There's no link between intelligence and gun safety.
I mean, they do let Marines have guns ... ;) :D
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

I've said before I'm for a ban and a buy back program (I'd be willing to consider limited exemptions to the ban). I just think we have proven as a society that we can't handle the responsibility that comes with the privilege. Sometimes it's necessary to take the toys away.

Football and hockey are dangerous, and we know it, and yet we put up with it. Players are continually hurt or maimed, some for life, physically and now we find with brain injuries. What's the cost to society. Look at what Jack Tatem did to Darryl Stingley. And then there's Butch Mousseau tragedy. He was just going out to officiate a game.

Time to take the toys away?


This post in no way was intended to denigrate the life of any specific person mentioned. I really miss Butch Mousseau. :(
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

This is what I mostly disagree with. It's the same type of crap logic kindergarten teachers, bosses, and other simpletons employ that make society a worse place. In the case of guns I can kinda see the reasoning behind this argument but that logic really irks me. (note I don't think you're a simpleton I just really hate when people employ that logic)

I'd probably chalk that argument up to laziness rather than being a simpleton ;)

I get that they are fun, fine, have shooting ranges with all sorts of weapons that are never to leave the premises. I just don't see the benefit that they provide to society that comes anywhere near the risk they pose. That's the bottom line for me.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Football and hockey are dangerous, and we know it, and yet we put up with it. Players are continually hurt or maimed, some for life, physically and now we find with brain injuries. What's the cost to society. Look at what Jack Tatem did to Darryl Stingley. And then there's Butch Mousseau tragedy. He was just going out to officiate a game.

Time to take the toys away?


This post in no way was intended to denigrate the life of any specific person mentioned. I really miss Butch Mousseau. :(

See my previous post. There is absolutely a cost of football and hockey, but also a benefit. I'd argue that at this point the cost to society (the best argument here is likely the increases in domestic violence when the home team loses, not the risk to individual players) doesn't so heavily outweigh the benefit that football and hockey should be stopped. Perhaps at the individual level that argument could be made, not societal, but athletes are willing to take the risk for the benefit they receive.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

I'd probably chalk that argument up to laziness rather than being a simpleton ;)

I get that they are fun, fine, have shooting ranges with all sorts of weapons that are never to leave the premises. I just don't see the benefit that they provide to society that comes anywhere near the risk they pose. That's the bottom line for me.

I was gonna edit and say that I don't think you're a simpleton but I was hoping it was obvious that I don't actually think that :(. I should've cleared that up my bad.

As for the bottom part I agree on the whole but that's mostly because of morons who own them or the fact that they're used for illegal purposes (mostly revolving around the drug trade that we keep incentivizing with this silly war on drugs that's been nothing but a drain on society since it's been implemented).
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Or how about if you sell a gun to a prohibited person there is some sort of penalty? That would be a lot more fair and easier to enforce. Gun owners are 100% behind things that will society safer but completely against regulation for the sake of regulation.

I'm not 100% sure on every single state, but generally, knowingly selling to a prohibited person is a Class E Felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top