unofan
Well-known member
No, my point was this election (or, more accurately, the outcome) was so emotionally charged that any statement either for or against a certain candidate will in all likelihood create a perception that not only is a candidate being attacked, but the listener himself/herself is also under attack. Therefore, unless a person feels the need to spend the day shouting at other people about politics, a person's best course is to simply ignore the statements and change the subject. Maybe, although I'm seriously beginning to doubt it, the emotion drains away a bit and people can talk again.
And I think most Clinton supporters don't feel attacked since the "attacks" are based on blatant falsehoods. Frustrated, depressed, annoyed? Sure. Attacked? No.
The irony is that when Clinton supporters push back using Trump's own recorded, verified statements, that causes anger on the other side.
This election proved that data and truth didn't matter, but truthiness and perception do. And at it's heart, America never got past the fifth grade since, apparently, "I know you are, but what am I" is a strategy that can win an election.