bigblue_dl
Armed
Re: This is a little outrageous! Pairwise Benefits for ECAC vs. Hockey East, WCHA, CC
We really should just move the entire ECAC to D3.
We really should just move the entire ECAC to D3.
We really should just move the entire ECAC to D3.
If there are 2, surely they can add a third.Sorry, they already have ECAC there. Two leagues of it.![]()
If there are 2, surely they can add a third.
And they ran out of Dr. Pepper!![]()
If there are 2, surely they can add a third.
I recall that they were referred to as Hockey Least at the time.![]()
1-0. Games against Harvard don't count.![]()
We'll stay D-I. At least we've won national championships (unlike AHA). See that gap between 1953 and 1955?![]()
He's a Tech fan, Dude. That makes that a swing and a miss.
He's a Tech fan, Dude. That makes that a swing and a miss.
He's a Tech fan, Dude. That makes that a swing and a miss.
Oops. At least I had the right state.![]()
![]()
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
I’m not sure you can convince me the ECAC wins 2 out of those 3 games.
Based on the 7-1 loss to Merrimack it's clear that the new guidelines are more accurate.Even though the equations were adjusted mid-season, bolstering ECAC teams and hurting teams of other conferences?
Maine dropped from #10 to #18 when they made that change.
OK let's forget PWR and look elsewhere. Based on Krach and RPI the answer is.... YES!So you think the ECAC wins 2 out of 3?
-Miami vs. RPI
-BU vs. Union
-Maine vs. Dartmouth
It will just mean that 4 EZAC teams are gone by the end of the second round of the NCAA playoffs.
If there's anything that doesn't make sense about the PWR, it's that BC loses the PWR comparison with DU despite having a higher win % and beating them twice in their building...
Exactly, those **** western ECAC teams!PWR is Western Biased?![]()
Exactly, those **** western ECAC teams!![]()