What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

THE University of MICHIGAN 2021-22

You're not wrong, but just the same I hear phones ringing already.

You mean the phone of the Michigan athletic department receiving calls of more complaints and details?

Certainly not other NCAA programs calling Mel. His next coaching gig will be in the KHL (if he’s lucky.)
 
I wonder what changed the AD from earlier this week siding with Pearson to now siding with the president and Regents.

My guess: A friendly reminder of who employs whom.

But will it be enough for the AD to stay on.
 
You mean the phone of the Michigan athletic department receiving calls of more complaints and details?

Certainly not other NCAA programs calling Mel. His next coaching gig will be in the KHL (if he’s lucky.)

No, I mean recruits who haven't signed NLIs yet.
 
So, was Brian Wiseman backing out of Islanders gig last week significant?

Not sure on this one. Only because why would he back out if Michigan still wasn't sure on Pearson's fate? Who would be calling him to say hey we need you to take over? Certainly not Warde Manuel. Unless we think Warde really wasn't in Pearson's corner and just wanted Pearson to think he was.
 
The 2022 incomings wouldn't be the target (as they'd have signed NLIs and are probably already on campus).

Now the 2023s and 2024s ...

Will depend on the HC hire. I was expecting some recruit turnover when Jerry York retired but so far BC hasn't lost any big recruits.
 
My implication is that some men that have been in the work force since the 70s and 80s have not adjusted to having women in the work force. I think it is less of an issue with the younger generations who have always worked beside women. And yes, I realize that I am generalizing a group, and being ageist, but these are the opinions I have formed based on the interactions I have had (as a female in engineering and manufacturing I encounter too much good 'ol boys club)

I have to agree with Devildog. You have painted an entire generation with a very broad stereotypical brush. There is no doubt that "some men" don't treat women with respect but to suggest that anyone of a certain age should retire because of your personal experiences is way over the top. You are indeed being ageist.
 
I have to agree with Devildog. You have painted an entire generation with a very broad stereotypical brush. There is no doubt that "some men" don't treat women with respect but to suggest that anyone of a certain age should retire because of your personal experiences is way over the top. You are indeed being ageist.

Just retired as a financial journalist in NY and we older folks have always had to push back against the dinosaur stereotype. But to quote an online commenter: “I’d say that more than any cohort in U.S. history, those over age 50 have had to be more adaptive than any generation before or since, because the bulk of innovation has occurred in our lifetimes."
 
I have to agree with Devildog. You have painted an entire generation with a very broad stereotypical brush. There is no doubt that "some men" don't treat women with respect but to suggest that anyone of a certain age should retire because of your personal experiences is way over the top. You are indeed being ageist.

You quoted wT referring to "some men" in your reply. How is that generalizing an entire generation?
 
Oh, well. This was always a possibility, and I agree with JD that Michigan wanted this to not be true, as they could have moved on months ago.

Who is next? Some former players do have experience as HC, and many of the HCs had Michigan ties one way or another.

As for wTs thoughts of the 70s and 80s mens having the most issues, I would agree with that, as the most cringe worthy stuff came from men of that era. Not all men, but the worst ones for sure. Feel free to defend yourself, just bear in mind that observations are observations. As well as the people getting fired- since that’s the era of men I saw let go at my corporation. It also matches the complaints I heard from my wife.

Anyway, time to move on. It will be interesting to see how fast a new coach is brought on, since this has been a possibility for so long.
 
Not sure what the precedent would be for this so close to the season but my guess is Michigan goes interim head coach for the year. Probably Muckalt unless he was implicated in the report as well.
 
You know I'm amazed that all of you are judging Mel in the court of public opinion simply based on what you've read. That's why trials sometimes have to be moved to a different venue because the potential jurors could be biased by the media.
I'm not saying these things didn't happen but does anyone here on forum have any firsthand knowledge of these accusations? There is a possibility the report is inaccurate.

Mrs. Pearson, the sources are numerous. All the players, staff, and coaches that came forward are numerous and varied in their link to Mel, but their experiences are consistent. The writer is neither a beat writer with an axe to grind or favor to curry, nor some hack social media "journalist" but a well respected law firm with no dog in the hunt. With the overwhelming amount of smoke, if you can't understand there's a fire burning there really is no hope for you.

As far as Manuel is concerned, I'm with many other posters. If I were sitting on the Board of Regents, I think I'd have been saying, "You really want to keep Mel after all this? You think what he did is appropriate?? All in favor of terminating Warde's contract effective 10 minutes from now, say, 'aye'."
 
Back
Top