What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Sic don't care. He's got his alternative facts and he's sticking to 'em. An anonymously delivered manila envelope is gonna mean more to this case than months of professional investigations.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.

It goes beyond and before the dossier to anyone not sucking FNC's teet.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.

You fell for it, ay? You're just another Rush, FNC, Breitbart, Alex Jones, Info Wars BOT. Welcome to Flagland.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

You fell for it, ay? You're just another Rush, FNC, Breitbart, Alex Jones, Info Wars BOT. Welcome to Flagland.

Of course he fell for it...he thinks the FBI tanked the Clinton investigation too cause why wouldnt they?

Sicatoka doesnt even hide it anymore. Either he is in full troll mode or he is fully in the tank for the knuckledraggers. His Faux Libertarian schtick is DOA.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">POTUS on 12/28: “I have the absolute right to do what I want with the Justice Department.” Today he slanders career DOJ professionals as “deep state,” calls for prison for a political opponent, and tries to sic DOJ on a potential witness against him. Beyond abnormal; dangerous. <a href="https://t.co/eW4MCIEOGB">https://t.co/eW4MCIEOGB</a></p>— Sally Yates (@SallyQYates) <a href="https://twitter.com/SallyQYates/status/948261017750032384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 2, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sic. Sally Yates deep state too? Maybe we should lock her up?
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Since Sicatoka is always "just asking the questions" about what went on, he might be interested in reading this.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-end-of-the-beginning

The most relevant point being, if there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, how did so many in the campaign know about the hacked DNC emails months before that news came out in the press?
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

We dont even need to go through all that...the question no one answers is "If the Trump Camp did nothing wrong, why do they lie about it when asked and then when confronted with the truth change their story?" You dont lie and cover up something in this manner unless you have a reason too.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

We dont even need to go through all that...the question no one answers is "If the Trump Camp did nothing wrong, why do they lie about it when asked and then when confronted with the truth change their story?" You dont lie and cover up something in this manner unless you have a reason too.

To be fair to the Dumps, they lie about everything, so lying is not in this case an indicator of guilt.

The sheer frequency, spontaneity and seeming irrelevance of his lies have no precedent. Nixon, Reagan and Clinton were protecting their reputations; Trump seems to lie for the pure joy of it.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

If you ask Trump if he owned casinos he will still say yes. (he wont admit he is such a bad business man he bankrupted them though) They still admit to basic stuff.

First they never talked to Russia. (then the Flynn info leaked) Then they got emails from Russia but it had no value. (then people who read the emails started leaking information) Then they only talked to Russia about some BS adoption stuff. (then information about the length of emails and meetings and who set them up leaked) Then as people were indicted over this stuff the Trump Campaign walked away from them and lied about how involved they were. (wrong play if you ask me...I would have played it off that they went rogue too easy to prove they were part of the campaign at high levels) Now Trump is saying they didnt collude but even if they did it isnt illegal because information is leaking again.

This is not the same type of lying the Trumps are known for. They will lie about their finances or how much power they have or how much people like them but this is a different style. This is spin control something he has never been good at. Changing the story and moving the goalposts this much is a red flag above any. Every journalist and FBI agent is reading this and their eyes are widening. This is why lawyers tell clients not to talk to investigators because every little thing you say that gets disproven is a domino. If you lie once and are caught you will lie again to cover up the original lie. The more you lie, the harder they will look.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Diane Feinstein has released the testimony grassley and the GOP tried to hide.
Fusion gps testimony says there was evidence of trump campaign and Russia before the Steele dossier.
Shocking the Rs want to suppress this, I know.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Well, she's getting investigated by Sessions DOJ next week.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Diane Feinstein has released the testimony grassley and the GOP tried to hide.
Fusion gps testimony says there was evidence of trump campaign and Russia before the Steele dossier.
Shocking the Rs want to suppress this, I know.
Way to go Diane. Way to go.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Diane Feinstein has released the testimony grassley and the GOP tried to hide.
Fusion gps testimony says there was evidence of trump campaign and Russia before the Steele dossier.
Shocking the Rs want to suppress this, I know.

And the GOP senators are trying (and failing) to paint Fusion as Putin cronies.
Also, the timeline has the GOP (in 2015) asking Fusion to look at Trump business deals well before any Trump-Russia connections came up.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Diane Feinstein has released the testimony grassley and the GOP tried to hide.
Fusion gps testimony says there was evidence of trump campaign and Russia before the Steele dossier.
Shocking the Rs want to suppress this, I know.

Page 175 seems to have some pretty ****ing info. In Sep 2016 when Steele met with the FBI to discuss the information he had, they indicated they already had corroborating evidence from a human source inside the Trump campaign.
 
Page 175 seems to have some pretty ****ing info. In Sep 2016 when Steele met with the FBI to discuss the information he had, they indicated they already had corroborating evidence from a human source inside the Trump campaign.

So Trump does have a Deepthroat. Kellyanne?
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

So Trump does have a Deepthroat. Kellyanne?

That was my prediction last week. She is losing millions being stuck in the WH.

I thought it was cute when some (I wont name names) around here pretended all of this started because of the Steele Dossier just because Right Radio made it seem that way.
 
Back
Top