What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

The Sicatoka

Kicizapi Cetan
Mueller mulls.
Strzok struck.
Mistresses.
Texts.
"Insurance policies."
Lies to the FBI over legal actions.
Much of the same crew investigating "emails" and "collusion".
A former MI6 guy's dossier funded by whom exactly.
And the FBI IG lurking invisibly behind all of this.

Hand this to Random House and they'd laugh you to the street.

All that said, where's my manila envelope?

Discuss.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

And you think your job sucks.

Meet Michael Horowitz.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...tion-could-landmine-robert-mueller/965396001/

He's had to at minimum peripherally look into:
- Fast and Furious
- DEA drug parties in Columbia
- "Emailz!!!" investigations procedures
- Collusion investigation procedures

I'm guessing his Christmas card list is pretty short. < insert jokes here about his name being Horowitz >
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

he will be fired soon anyhow....

At this point, that's the very last thing that'll happen.

The investigation has done enough damage to itself to allow it to be painted as damaged goods. USA Today is pointing out problems (see above) and they are far from Trumpists.

Why would Trump get rid of that when he can cry "victim" and "swamp!" instead. The only thing Trump likes more than puffing himself up is playing the victim.
 
Last edited:
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

All of this to question the base investigation that is looking into a foreign county illegally getting involved with our election.

Why people question that investigation is beyond me. Should be easy to support that, since so many are so concerned about other counties and all.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

All of this to question the base investigation that is looking into a foreign county illegally getting involved with our election.

Why people question that investigation is beyond me.

What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.
 
Last edited:
What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.
We have a medical thread in case you hurt your back carrying all that water for Trump.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

I love how the tainted and fake investigation has resulted in four indictments and two guilty pleas...so far.
 
What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.

The FBI was a political weapon simply because they began an investigation based on information that was revealed by opposition research? That's quite a leap. They saw the allegations in the dossier, looked into it further and found at least some of it credible. So they started their own investigation. That's how it's supposed to work.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.

Jesus, you really are a dumbass.

Just cause the FBI can't confirm some of the revelations contained in the dossier, does not mean the entire document is questionable. What about the parts that they have confirmed?

As far as a foreign country involving themselves in our election process, did you miss the news about Russian paid organizations planting fake news on Twitter and Facebook? You know, confirmed to have happened.

Paid political opposition research initiated by a conservative online organization, funded by a wealthy donor to Marco Rubio. But I guess you either missed, or just intentionally leaving that little fact out, in your effort to make some sort of point. What that point is, other than blatant water carrying for Donald Trump, I don't know.

But yeah, you're a non-partisan libertarian.

Your USA Today article you linked to seemingly to show a slam dunk "Mueller is crooked" claim, was nothing more than a bunch of speculations and what-ifs.

For a supposedly intelligent person, you seem to post, and believe, a lot of really stupid ****.
 
Last edited:
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

It's a cautionary tale that intelligent people, if exposed to a steady diet of propaganda and the confirmation bias of being with people who think alike, start saying and worse believing really dumb stuff. This obviously applies to everyone regardless of partisanship.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Based on what he's posted on this board, I have been unable to confirm the existence of any sort of intelligence or critical thinking whatsoever. So the only conclusion that can be drawn is that he must be a blithering idiot.
 
Re: The "There's no Special Prosecutor thread?" thread

Based on what he's posted on this board, I have been unable to confirm the existence of any sort of intelligence or critical thinking whatsoever. So the only conclusion that can be drawn is that he must be a blithering idiot.

Still, we all have to be careful. The insidious thing about bias is, undetected and/or uncorrected, it can reduce smart people to the level of average people. There are few enough smart people that we can't afford to lessen that number.
 
Last edited:
What is the basis of the claims of a foreign power getting involved in a US election? The Steele Dossier? So the FBI is basing investigations on paid political opposition research, research that even the FBI questions its veracity? (same link)

That by itself (the FBI as a political weapon) should terrify our democracy. (We expect the partisan non-sensical crap from Congress.)

I sure hope the FBI has more than that; otherwise, this is damage to their reputation of being factual and neutral that will follow them for decades.

So every intelligence agencies is wrong because you say so? Pardon me while I ignore your complete lack of logic and point and laugh at you.

This investigation has already found more than they found about Hillary and you thought she was a criminal. Hell Trump has admitted to doing more than anyone has ever proven about her but still you keep looking away.

I will go with the people in the know over some rube in NoDak who doesn't even have the stones to admit he is saying all this cause of the party of the candidate even though a two year old can see it.

BTW facts support nothing you say.
 
Last edited:
Jesus, you really are a dumbass.

Just cause the FBI can't confirm some of the revelations contained in the dossier, does not mean the entire document is questionable. What about the parts that they have confirmed?

As far as a foreign country involving themselves in our election process, did you miss the news about Russian paid organizations planting fake news on Twitter and Facebook? You know, confirmed to have happened.

Paid political opposition research initiated by a conservative online organization, funded by a wealthy donor to Marco Rubio. But I guess you either missed, or just intentionally leaving that little fact out, in your effort to make some sort of point. What that point is, other than blatant water carrying for Donald Trump, I don't know.

But yeah, you're a non-partisan libertarian.

Your USA Today article you linked to seemingly to show a slam dunk "Mueller is crooked" claim, was nothing more than a bunch of speculations and what-ifs.

For a supposedly intelligent person, you seem to post, and believe, a lot of really stupid ****.

He probably missed all these facts while "on the road" just like when people call him out on his bs and he disappears for a month ;)
 
It's a cautionary tale that intelligent people, if exposed to a steady diet of propaganda and the confirmation bias of being with people who think alike, start saying and worse believing really dumb stuff. This obviously applies to everyone regardless of partisanship.
At the very least he posts on here, that’s better than like 99.999% of his ilk.
 
Of course, you would start this thread. :rolleyes:

Why not? Tax bill passed, stick it to da libs in da blue states. It’s like sic took viagra. Every day that passes that mueller hasn’t arrested trump is a victory for sic- just like when trump manages to wipe his own *** now and then.
Of course it’s not a problem if a foreign nation interfered! I mean it would be if a D got elected too, I’m quite sure
 
Back
Top