trixR4kids
Well-known member
continue
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Wisconsin Supreme Court judge losing by less than one percent is so ****ing typical. What the **** is wrong with the democratic party that it is institutionally incapable of winning these structurally important races?</p>— Mike Beyer (@MichaelWBeyer) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelWBeyer/status/1113294319090315264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 3, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I'm saying her single vote objectively didn't matter and that's why it's not worth spending a lot of time on. As for WI:scooby said:What focus? So, we should just bury the story and pretend it never happened. Sure. That's probably why the Wisconsin vote yesterday went the way it did.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Wisconsin Supreme Court judge losing by less than one percent is so ****ing typical. What the **** is wrong with the democratic party that it is institutionally incapable of winning these structurally important races?</p>— Mike Beyer (@MichaelWBeyer) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelWBeyer/status/1113294319090315264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 3, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Last edited: