What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

Is there anything you won't complain about?

"Hey! You call this slop? Real slop has got chunks of things in it! This is more like gruel! And this Château le Blanc '68 is supposed to be served slightly chilled! This is room temperature! What do you think we are? Animals?"

Please, sir, I want some more.
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

I'm not advocating for anything, I believe ACA is a joke, set up by lobbyists to make money for their masters.

Yeah, probably. But no where near as bad as Medicare Prescription D was. And the supposed conservative party passed that with flying colors.
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

"We won't allow the Republicans to shut down the government over Obamacare," claimed the Democrats. "We'll wait until after the debt ceiling bill is passed, and then we'll turn on Obamacare ourselves without any prompting."

[Jeanne Shaheen, ]The [Democrat] New Hampshire senator fundamentally altered the health-care fight on Tuesday with a letter to the White House demanding it both extend the ObamaCare enrollment deadline and waive tax penalties for those unable to enroll. Within nanoseconds, Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor had endorsed her "common-sense idea." By Wednesday night, five Senate Democrats were on board.

In the Senate, West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin is working on legislation to delay the individual mandate's enforcement for a year. CNN reports that all 16 Senate Democrats up for re-election are expected to support Ms. Shaheen's proposal. In the House, Democratic members are stacking up behind all of these ideas.

Even House liberals have felt it necessary to reassure voters that they, too, are angry—though so far they are merely calling for scalps. "I'd like to see somebody lose their job over this. I think it's outrageous," complained New York Rep. Sean Maloney. "Somebody's got to man up here—get rid of these people," said Minnesota's Rick Nolan.

a numerically significant number of Senate Democrats have, on their own, signaled that it is acceptable for members of the president's party to demand consequential ObamaCare changes.

The pressure for other Democrats to join will rise, as will the pressure for the party to embrace more extensive changes to the law. Even before the ObamaCare rollout, Mr. Pryor and North Carolina's Kay Hagan had co-sponsored legislation to kill ObamaCare's rationing board (the House version has 23 Democratic co-sponsors). Alaska Sen. Mark Begich had introduced a bill to delay the business mandate for two years. There is bipartisan opposition to the medical-device tax, to the ObamaCare slush fund and to the IRS's central role in coordinating the law.

These are all Democrats talking here, none of them are those crazy wild-eyed bomb-throwing Republicans.

Right, we merely need to tweak a few glitches.....:rolleyes:
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

Is there anything you won't be obnoxious about?

Walrus gets an F for not recognizing the Naked Gun reference. :D

Fishy, your slavish devotion to right wing talking points is amusing if a bit trite, but Democrats have always indicated a willingness to adjust whatever needs adjusting. Think about it - don't you knuckledraggers complain whenever Obama adjusts a deadline? Doesn't that adjusting prove the point? Or are we suspending logic here in order to have a conversation with you?
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

Oops the ACA website is down completely

But if you are happy with your current coverage and policy you can keep it! If you want to keep the same doctor for your care, you can! I know this to be true because my president told me so several times on the various media. I will just now ignore the letter from Horizon BC of NJ that my wife received telling her that her policy will not be renewed this coming year because it does not include all the regualtions of the ACA. I am sure that when they do get around to offering us a new policy that the coverage will most certainly not be the same or better and that the out of pocket cost for deductible and copayments will likewise not be what we had before. My wife and I have been in the medicine for almost 45 years. We have dealt with the insurance coverage/medicare/medicaid/ etc for all of that time. I think we are in the rathe unique position of understand what the ramifications of this is going to be. The non functioning web site is the least of my problem with this entire fiasco.
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

But if you are happy with your current coverage and policy you can keep it! If you want to keep the same doctor for your care, you can! I know this to be true because my president told me so several times on the various media. I will just now ignore the letter from Horizon BC of NJ that my wife received telling her that her policy will not be renewed this coming year because it does not include all the regualtions of the ACA. I am sure that when they do get around to offering us a new policy that the coverage will most certainly not be the same or better and that the out of pocket cost for deductible and copayments will likewise not be what we had before. My wife and I have been in the medicine for almost 45 years. We have dealt with the insurance coverage/medicare/medicaid/ etc for all of that time. I think we are in the rathe unique position of understand what the ramifications of this is going to be. The non functioning web site is the least of my problem with this entire fiasco.
It was Obamas signature legislation and he had no clue what was in it. He stood up and lied just like the rest, but no sticky
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

I find this the most peculiar thing about Health Care in the United States.

1. The Conservative party in the US finds the "payment" part of the law the part they hate the most and want overturned.
2. The last Health Care law passed at the Federal Level by the Conservative party had no payment provision whatsoever.

Bottom line? Obama was better off just passing an expansion of Medicaid, CHIPS, a preexisting condition mandate, and a "cover your kids till 26" mandate and NOT paid for it all just added it to the debt. It would have passed and no one would even be talking about it right now.
 
Fishbreath, once again you're busted. People are "losing" crappy health plans that don't meet minimum coverage requirements. For example if you had insurance that only covered you if you lost a body part, the ACA will inform your carrier that charging for such minimal coverage is not legal so stop offering the plan. Most likely these people will obtain more coverage for the same price or less out on the exchanges.

Is that a fact or an article of faith?
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

Rover

Can't find your quote that was quoted below. So here would be my response....


True -- absolutely 100% true.

BUT, you then get a plan whose premium just went up by multiples of 100% and whose deductible may have doubled or tripled and may have less coverage than what you had, or may cover things you do not need. In a stagnant economy, a whopper of a out of pocket increase is not appreciated, especially if you have done nothing to contribute to that increase.

And if the legislation (settled law) says that the implementation is date X, nobody, outside of the legislature may change that date (assuming that you live in a nation of laws, not a nation of government by diktat).
 
But if you are happy with your current coverage and policy you can keep it! If you want to keep the same doctor for your care, you can! I know this to be true because my president told me so several times on the various media. I will just now ignore the letter from Horizon BC of NJ that my wife received telling her that her policy will not be renewed this coming year because it does not include all the regualtions of the ACA. I am sure that when they do get around to offering us a new policy that the coverage will most certainly not be the same or better and that the out of pocket cost for deductible and copayments will likewise not be what we had before. My wife and I have been in the medicine for almost 45 years. We have dealt with the insurance coverage/medicare/medicaid/ etc for all of that time. I think we are in the rathe unique position of understand what the ramifications of this is going to be. The non functioning web site is the least of my problem with this entire fiasco.

Look doc, we got the best humanities majors and poli sci happy hour heroes into a room and crafted this for the higher glory of service to humanity. How dare you criticize the best and the brightest in spite of the technocratic faith. We are good people and do are actions are prima facie good. Anybody who disagrees is either dumb or has an ulterior motive.

Seriously, a whole load of "nothing to see here, move along". And any attempt to point out the obvious faults is smeared with lack of caring about people or stating that its been set up to fail because we're not willing to help them in their endeavor. It is interesting in that it means they're giving up the notion that they have the best and brightest trying to engineer a wonderful idea. Now it's our fault that somehow we are denying them resources. I thought if you had the best and brightest then you wouldn't need a course correction? I thought that is what this was all about. Now I'm being told that it isn't doable.

Even further is the meme that we would admit the faults and failures if not for THEM as our failure enable THEM. Really? You are that freaking weak? That didn't stop you when you thought you were superman(men). This blame shifting is really really stupid. It also belies who you do and do not trust. I'd love to peel this one out further. It seems liberals are boxed in and if you look at it, it's a strong reveal of what they think of everybody else. That they can't run things and function at their best because of THEM but we should trust them to operate at their best. We should paper over flaws not because they are flaws but because it gives ammo to the notion there may be an underlying fault.

So basically, to protect a political culture, they mounted lie on lie in fear of THEM. Really? This is what to expect from the technocratic wonders? No wonder the masters of transparency act so guardedly. At the end of the day they see the world as something out to ruin their perfection. What it really means is that the people of the nation are not fit to rule themselves because they'll make the "incorrect" decisions. That's a terrible way to run a free democratic society.
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

People you're making me yawn. After I've been up late watching the Sox no less.

A technological roll out was buggy. Never seen that before (Windows Vista, Windows 8, etc). Take a deep breath, relax, and wait for the thing to get fixed. If it truly is supposed to bring about the Zombie Apocalypse, don't you want it to take a while to fix so the zombie's stay at bay for a little bit longer? :D :rolleyes:

Old political joke: Why don't cannibals eat liberals?

Professional courtesy. ;)
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

A technological roll out was buggy. Never seen that before (Windows Vista, Windows 8, etc).
I'm thinking that a marketing plan for the healthcare program of, "Hey, we're just like Windows Vista" wouldn't be a good strategy. Windows Vista sucks. :p
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

Nope, no sticky. I work in IT. I think this whole website debacle is stupidity incarnate. However, I see this level of incompetence every day in my field so I'm not surprised.

"Everyday" do you see this level of incompetence involving a site that took 300 million dollars of taxpayer money and three years to build? Je le doute.
 
Re: The PPACA - Implementation Phase I

NBC News reported Monday that sources deeply involved in ObamaCare concede that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to have coverage canceled in the next year.

One expert said the figure could be as high as 80 percent.

Obama administration officials knew when the regulations were written in 2010 that 40 to 67 percent of consumers on the individual market would lose coverage, NBC said

Who are they to declare what kind of policies are good enough when every one of the 50 states have a state department of insurance that tailors plan requirements to the specific needs of that state's residents, and when all 50 states coordinate their insurance requirements through the National Association of Insurance Commissioners? The NAIC already provides model language for laws, and the members of NAIC vote on reserve requirements and quality of reserves so that they are uniform throughout the 50 states.

We have policies that have helped low-income people get essential coverage for decades being tossed now because some white-collar elitist far removed from real life as experienced by most people makes something up that s/he thinks "ought to be" reasonable, without any basis in experience or technical knowledge?

If there is a Deity, please protect us from the federal government!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top