What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The Playoff Scoreboard

Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

Cassidy Anderson makes the Huskies back to back HE Champions......erasing the end of the 3rd period antics!
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

Sorry TTT....I’m sure you’re in the crowd at Providence, down hearted once again.....but the Eagles are in the mix! We all know where the Wildcats are! ☹️☹️☹️
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

Congrats Clarkson women on your 3rd ECAC tournament championship in a row! And surely a lock for home ice in the NCAA quarterfinals.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

Frankly, I don't know if I really want MN to make a full come back, but just want them to play hard. The team would benefit from a lesson from the early play.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

Ah well. I thought it was a frustrating yet great game. #2 seed. I'm hoping the team learns what should be a very valuable lesson. You play to not lose. You often will.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

Steffes should have been gone for the game on that hit.

I bet it looked worse live than on "TV". She really didn't check as much as hold, If fact, "holding' was the call. Try to find it on video and see if you don't change your mind. Definitely a 2, but not a 5.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

I bet it looked worse live than on "TV". She really didn't check as much as hold, If fact, "holding' was the call. Try to find it on video and see if you don't change your mind. Definitely a 2, but not a 5.

Watched it on "TV" myself. I have little doubt that it would have been 5 in the first period of a regular season game.

Having said that, the timing of any penalty in the last couple minutes of a close game is tough - whichever way it goes.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

I'm not a fan of that interference call...

The rodent jumped up and got both her skates off the ice at the same time, then fell on her butt. That's a 4.8 for the diving team.

The Steffen penalty the rodent had awfully weak legs on that one. I didn't think Steffen was that strong.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

The rodent jumped up and got both her skates off the ice at the same time, then fell on her butt. That's a 4.8 for the diving team.

The Steffen penalty the rodent had awfully weak legs on that one. I didn't think Steffen was that strong.

If you didn't know better, either one of those comments by themself might have a chance of being correct. Together they show an unfortunately high (that is to say neck) position in manure. :)
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

If you didn't know better, either one of those comments by themself might have a chance of being correct. Together they show an unfortunately high (that is to say neck) position in manure. :)

While my head is still above the pile :) I will say that I get the call on Steffen. The other call no way.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

The rodent jumped up and got both her skates off the ice at the same time, then fell on her butt. That's a 4.8 for the diving team.

Even if true, this is irrelevant to the call that was made, which was interference. Once the attacking player chips the puck and moves to go around the defender, it is illegal to move laterally to impede their progress. Whether they leave their skates or the defender knocks them down doesn't matter; it's the obstruction that is the penalty. Wisconsin fans can be forgiven for having no idea what the interference rule is, though, because committing it and not getting called is one of the Badgers' core competencies.

As I said, I thought the one that was called was borderline, but there were plenty of examples where a Badger was clearly guilty without a call, so I don't feel any sympathy for them.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

I bet it looked worse live than on "TV". She really didn't check as much as hold, If fact, "holding' was the call. Try to find it on video and see if you don't change your mind. Definitely a 2, but not a 5.

Let's just say that, given your stated beliefs about Abby Roque, I don't trust your judgment on this.
 
Re: The Playoff Scoreboard

E Wisconsin fans can be forgiven for having no idea what the interference rule is, though, because committing it and not getting called is one of the Badgers' core competencies.

As I said, I thought the one that was called was borderline, but there were plenty of examples where a Badger was clearly guilty without a call, so I don't feel any sympathy for them.

One of the truest things you have said on this site. It is foundational to their game.
 
Back
Top