What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

uaafanblog said:
Just exactly how is that "ouch" worthy? Unless of course by "ouch" you mean ... "UAF is committed to D1 Hockey at the highest level".

Jeezus ... it really blows goats that UAA and UAF are stuck in a conference with so many programs who don't appear to be fully committed to D1 hockey.
Click to expand...
yeah, because fan reactions to things mean thats how the admins feel....btw, don't like it get the f out. We wouldn't miss you.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

Originally Posted by uaafanblog
Just exactly how is that "ouch" worthy? Unless of course by "ouch" you mean ... "UAF is committed to D1 Hockey at the highest level".
Click to expand...

ouch, your perpetual butthurt. it must be a painful condition, and we empathize in the Midwest.

because we were talking about operating expenses--not total investment, "commitment", dick size, or anything else.
btw, anchorage's 2012-2013 operating expenses were less than half of UAF's. in your world, that apparently means that UAF is twice as "committed" to hockey as anchorage. oh noes! lol.
 
uaafanblog said:
Just exactly how is that "ouch" worthy? Unless of course by "ouch" you mean ... "UAF is committed to D1 Hockey at the highest level".

Jeezus ... it really blows goats that UAA and UAF are stuck in a conference with so many programs who don't appear to be fully committed to D1 hockey.
Click to expand...
Well why don't you see if one of those conferences that are better committed will take you. Where exactly would your program be without these schools of lesser commitment? Oh...The ACHC, Alaska Collegiate Hockey Conference. You need Ferris and Northern and Bemidji and LSSU.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

uaafanblog said:
Jeezus ... it really blows goats that UAA and UAF are stuck in a conference with so many programs who don't appear to be fully committed to D1 hockey.
Click to expand...

You're not STUCK anywhere, jackhole.
Leave anytime you like.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

uaafanblog said:
Just exactly how is that "ouch" worthy? Unless of course by "ouch" you mean ... "UAF is committed to D1 Hockey at the highest level".

Jeezus ... it really blows goats that UAA and UAF are stuck in a conference with so many programs who don't appear to be fully committed to D1 hockey.
Click to expand...

Assuming the reports are true, shouldn't you be at the local strip club that has pregnant chicks? "I like _______ because the girls there are REAL." :p
 
Last edited:
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

uaafanblog said:
it really blows goats that UAA and UAF are stuck in a conference with so many programs who don't appear to be fully committed to D1 hockey.
Click to expand...

Tell you what. When either Alaska school wins THEIR FIRST league title - regular season OR playoff - instead of of one of these other programs who aren't "fully committed to D1 hockey", then come back and try again. And no, anything you won in the Great West Hockey Conference against Northern Arizona and US international doesn't count.
 
John J. MacInnes said:
Tell you what. When either Alaska school wins THEIR FIRST league title - regular season OR playoff - instead of of one of these other programs who aren't "fully committed to D1 hockey", then come back and try again. And no, anything you won in the Great West Hockey Conference against Northern Arizona and US international doesn't count.
Click to expand...

I'm more convinced than ever that Donald is a troll. No one could be that delusional while maintaining the mental capacity to use the Internet.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

John J. MacInnes said:
Tell you what. When either Alaska school wins THEIR FIRST league title - regular season OR playoff - instead of of one of these other programs who aren't "fully committed to D1 hockey", then come back and try again. And no, anything you won in the Great West Hockey Conference against Northern Arizona and US international doesn't count.
Click to expand...

To steal a quote from Patrick Roy: The U.P. teams can't hear what the Alaskans are saying because we have National Champion rings plugging our ears. :D:D:D
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

uaafanblog said:
Jeezus ... it really blows goats that UAA and UAF are stuck in a conference with so many programs who don't appear to be fully committed to D1 hockey.
Click to expand...

You have my deepest sympathies. Allow me to express my condolence in this haiku:

I feel bad for you
It must suck to be a fan
of UA hockey
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

Freddie said:
2-3 years down the road, the CCHA (in some form) will re-emerge.

I'm NOT saying that I HOPE or WISH it would happen...just that I believe it WILL happen.
The economic realities are undeniable and the present layout is unsustainable.

BG, Miami, WMU, FSU...(plus LSSU, if they want) and 2-3 AH schools.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone is against that. You also want Alaska, Alaska Anchorage, Alabama Huntsville, right?
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

For this coming year it looks to me even closer than last year. A number of the teams that were good last year, are better this year. If your team is not better, you could end up down with Huntsville and out.
I would really like to see the league do better against other leagues, I think that's a key to getting more teams in the dance.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

Omfg. Not only did this moron completely misinterpret the sentence, he went full derp on it too.

I love you thread. Never change.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

dxmnkd316 said:
Omfg. Not only did this moron completely misinterpret the sentence, he went full derp on it too.

I love you thread. Never change.
Click to expand...
What sentence? Oh you mean the jibberish you were trying to make into a sentence.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

I think it's hilarious he's trying to critique the sentence structure when really there isn't anything wrong with it.

This can't get any better. *crosses fingers*

Edit: Speaking of gibberish...

Seawolf Fan said:
Like a past President or someone once said about pornography or something he or she didn't agree with: "I can't define it but I know it when I see it."
Or he or she said something to that effect about something.
Is that vague enough for you?
Perhaps it was a "troll" being spoke of.
What's your definition of a "troll"?
I wonder if your definition matches up with my definition?
If your definition varies from mine does that make you the "troll" or me?
If this post upsets you go ahead and paint me red.
Or report me as a "troll".
Just sayin..........

Edit: maybe that's what they put the ignore button on this thing for.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

dxmnkd316 said:
I think it's hilarious he's trying to critique the sentence structure when really there isn't anything wrong with it.

This can't get any better. *crosses fingers*

Edit: Speaking of gibberish...
Click to expand...
Now, DX, it isn't nice to make fun of the mentally incompetent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top