What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The Barr Has Been Raised at UMaine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Care to explain for a still relatively new Black Bear why they cut men's soccer at all? Doesn't seem like a particularly financially strenuous program to support, and all the schools nearby have one. Was it strictly Title IX related? I would still find that odd, but it's probably the most likely scenario.

Because Blake James has never touched anything that didn't turn to shit.
 
The financials do report contributions, both to specific sports and overall, which includes non-directed donations. Here are the reported contributions for Maine for 2010-2020:
[TABLE="width: 312"]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl66"] [/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]Football[/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]Hockey[/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]non-directed[/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]Overall[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2010[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]322,747[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]131,665[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]133,429[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,435,952[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2011[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]375,640[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]193,601[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]514,032[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,446,805[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2012[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]527,321[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]131,592[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]458,552[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,617,010[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2013[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]325,952[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]90,361[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]256,091[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,295,632[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2014[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]508,705[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]97,078[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]455,253[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,530,612[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2015[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]524,497[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]105,001[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]375,067[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,755,282[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2016[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]513,011[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]150,002[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]284,183[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,491,770[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2017[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]522,958[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]234,746[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]392,403[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,665,166[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2018[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]448,571[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]261,746[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]735,821[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]2,095,232[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2019[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]461,442[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]203,194[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]370,529[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,734,635[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2020[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]465,427[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]240,050[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]174,777[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,476,662[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Contributions to football have been generally been at least double contributions to hockey, so it has strong financial support. Furthermore, football donations have ranged between 21% and 34% of total contributions each year, while hockey contributions have been between 6% and 16% of total contributions.

As for making money, that is not supposed to be the purpose of college sports (and indeed, the NCAA likes to report revenue with red/pink highlights and expenses with green highlights). And in fact, of the 30 or so pubic schools with D1 hockey only 6 have reported earned profits between 2010 and 2020:
Michigan (2016-20)
Michigan State (2010, 12-13, 16-19)
Minnesota (2018)
Ohio State (2010-18, 20)
Penn State (2016-20)
Wisconsin (2019)

Every other school for every year that they had DI hockey spent more on athletics than they earned, with UConn and UMass having the largest deficits, although Air Force has joined them.

I also agree that a full DI school should support multiple programs, and ones that are competitive, at least within their league or conference. Unfortunately, many schools have lost sight of the purpose of college athletes. They have become focused on trying to have a top DI basketball or FBS football program and the money and school recognition that such a program reaps.

Sean

I was going to ask if any D1 schools broke even or were in the black with athletics financially.

Where do programs like Duluth, minnesota. North Dakota, BC, Notre Dame land in the last few years with how much they spend on hockey and their P/L.

​​​​​​D1 school athletics should be a well rounded palate and not just overweighted in a particular sport. I think Maine does a fairly decent job with this particularly in the ladies sports. The mens side needs some help.
 
The financials do report contributions, both to specific sports and overall, which includes non-directed donations. Here are the reported contributions for Maine for 2010-2020:

[TABLE="width: 312"]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl66"] [/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]Football[/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]Hockey[/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]non-directed[/TD]
[TD="class: xl67"]Overall[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2010[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]322,747[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]131,665[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]133,429[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,435,952[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2011[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]375,640[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]193,601[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]514,032[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,446,805[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2012[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]527,321[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]131,592[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]458,552[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,617,010[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2013[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]325,952[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]90,361[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]256,091[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,295,632[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2014[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]508,705[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]97,078[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]455,253[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,530,612[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2015[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]524,497[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]105,001[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]375,067[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,755,282[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2016[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]513,011[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]150,002[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]284,183[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,491,770[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2017[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]522,958[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]234,746[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]392,403[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,665,166[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2018[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]448,571[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]261,746[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]735,821[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]2,095,232[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2019[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]461,442[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]203,194[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]370,529[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,734,635[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: xl68"]2020[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]465,427[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]240,050[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]174,777[/TD]
[TD="class: xl65, align: right"]1,476,662[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


Contributions to football have been generally been at least double contributions to hockey, so it has strong financial support. Furthermore, football donations have ranged between 21% and 34% of total contributions each year, while hockey contributions have been between 6% and 16% of total contributions.

As for making money, that is not supposed to be the purpose of college sports (and indeed, the NCAA likes to report revenue with red/pink highlights and expenses with green highlights). And in fact, of the 30 or so pubic schools with D1 hockey only 6 have reported earned profits between 2010 and 2020:
Michigan (2016-20)
Michigan State (2010, 12-13, 16-19)
Minnesota (2018)
Ohio State (2010-18, 20)
Penn State (2016-20)
Wisconsin (2019)

Every other school for every year that they had DI hockey spent more on athletics than they earned, with UConn and UMass having the largest deficits, although Air Force has joined them.

I also agree that a full DI school should support multiple programs, and ones that are competitive, at least within their league or conference. Unfortunately, many schools have lost sight of the purpose of college athletes. They have become focused on trying to have a top DI basketball or FBS football program and the money and school recognition that such a program reaps.

Sean

Another very informative post. Thanks.

I was a bit surprised to see the above, but when I considered the fact that the 6 Rust-Belt schools you cited play decent to big-time football, a light went on... That's clearly what's pulling the cart, and an Alabama (eg) doesn't have to spend a dime on hockey.

Oh well, we'll likely never see another Winkin baseball program, nor a Skip Chapelle hoops program, nor another Walsh-type deal with hockey at Maine. I'm cautiously optimistic that Barr can drag hockey out of the gutter (and I'll still write them a check or two) but football is the best mens' program at Maine right now, and it's not even close.
 
As for making money, that is not supposed to be the purpose of college sports.

955t.gif

That was a good one!
 
So football loses a ton of money regardless of how many FBS games it plays.

Football has also made the NCAA tournament six times this millenium (fewer than hockey!). Football has won two playoff games in the last ten years.

This is not some national power team that is getting national attention. It's a mediocre program. And it is mediocre playing playoff games on the campuses of small directional universities in rural America. It's useless.
 
For me, not useless at all. I find it entertaining, and provides many HS football players a chance to continue in their sport with some getting a chance at the NFL.
On a par with hockey as far as playing the best in the country? No. Not happening, buts that okay. Let the hockey team have a realistic goal of returning to National Championship level. Meanwhile, let the football team strive to be the best, at their level….
 
No reason to mock the most astute poster on this site. Pretty-much no one else here is willing (or able) to crunch the data.
Thanks for the support. It's good to know that some posters here appreciate my data crunching as stats aren't for everyone.

That was a good one!
Yes, it was, which is why I wrote it the way I did. But for every school that makes money from athletics, or more specifically football and basketball, there are 44 or so that lose money. Of course, some of those, like UMass and UConn, dream of making money, but they fail to do so. However, most schools know that athletics will not make money.

So football loses a ton of money regardless of how many FBS games it plays.

Football has also made the NCAA tournament six times this millenium (fewer than hockey!). Football has won two playoff games in the last ten years.

This is not some national power team that is getting national attention. It's a mediocre program. And it is mediocre playing playoff games on the campuses of small directional universities in rural America. It's useless.
Useless for what? If the purpose of Maine's athletics is to make money, then yes. If it is to raise the school's national profile then you are probably correct. If it's to give fans of football and the school games that they can watch and cheer on their team it's probably not useless. And if it's to give student athletes a chance to get an education and continue to participate in a sport they presumably enjoy then no, football at Maine is not useless.

That said, BU eliminated football back in 1997 as a cost savings measure. While some BU fans have never forgotten or forgiven the then administration for that, because of it BU currently has 22 varsity teams. Meanwhile Maine dropped soccer and volleyball back in 2009 and currently has 15 varsity teams. It's not just offering sports, but offering sports that students want to participate in, fans want to watch, and that might raise the school's national profile, among other factors.

Also, note that the NCAA financial reports don't break out earned revenue vs institutional support as I (and others) do.

Sean
 
That said, BU eliminated football back in 1997 as a cost savings measure. While some BU fans have never forgotten or forgiven the then administration for that, because of it BU currently has 22 varsity teams. Meanwhile Maine dropped soccer and volleyball back in 2009 and currently has 15 varsity teams. It's not just offering sports, but offering sports that students want to participate in, fans want to watch, and that might raise the school's national profile, among other factors.

Sean

Fans don't want to watch anything at BU other than hockey. And fans in general don't want to watch any college sports outside of football, basketball and in select cases...hockey.
 
So football loses a ton of money regardless of how many FBS games it plays.

Football has also made the NCAA tournament six times this millenium (fewer than hockey!). Football has won two playoff games in the last ten years.

This is not some national power team that is getting national attention. It's a mediocre program. And it is mediocre playing playoff games on the campuses of small directional universities in rural America. It's useless.

Small directional universities in rural America? North Dakota....South Dakota....Montana....Delaware....UNH......those sound like peers in similar rural/small population states.

On the other hand.....Maine hockey is trying to out-do Quinnipiac....St. Cloud (D2).....Minnesota State (D2).....Michigan Tech (D2).....Bemidji State (D2).....Clarkson (?)......I'm sure that fans across America are chomping at the bit to see college hockey games with names like that.
 
Sean do you have a link to financials for other schools hockey programs, expenses vs revenue? Would be interested to see how various schools stack up.

Yes, there are folks here who do appreciate your numbers. Its an impressive undertaking.
​​​​​​​
 
So football loses a ton of money regardless of how many FBS games it plays.

Football has also made the NCAA tournament six times this millenium (fewer than hockey!). Football has won two playoff games in the last ten years.

This is not some national power team that is getting national attention. It's a mediocre program. And it is mediocre playing playoff games on the campuses of small directional universities in rural America. It's useless.

Not to come off as my usual AH self, but football has been in the National mix well since hockey has been, and that's completely verifiable.

Football, in fact, was one win away from another berth this season, while hockey hasn't been within a country mile of a National berth in many years.

(Was mens' soccer any good at Maine? I'm guessing that 94% of us have no idea, and that's a telling fact regarding which programs to support.)
 
Not to come off as my usual AH self, but football has been in the National mix well since hockey has been, and that's completely verifiable.

Football, in fact, was one win away from another berth this season, while hockey hasn't been within a country mile of a National berth in many years.

Maine was in tournament position way back in 2020 before Coronavirus canceled everything, but that was many years ago.
 
Sean do you have a link to financials for other schools hockey programs, expenses vs revenue? Would be interested to see how various schools stack up.

Yes, there are folks here who do appreciate your numbers. Its an impressive undertaking.
Yes, here is my NCAA Financial spreadsheet. The link is in my sig, but if you have the forum set to shoW newest posts at the top sigs don't show (or didn't the last time I checked). The spreadsheet is updated with 2020 NCAA reports, but not the more limited EADA reports for the private schools. I requested the NCAA reports when the are usually first available last year instead of waiting until later and the government was slow to post the EADA data. I just downloaded it and now need to transcribe the information and add the additional data I either find elsewhere or extrapolate.

By the way, the columns at the far right of my spreadsheets for yearly hockey (overall profit/loss, earned profit/loss, game day profit/loss, sports camps profit/loss, Athlete Meals per Participant, tuition, total attendance, average ticket cost, year-to-year expenses change) and yearly overall (overall, earned, camps and bowls* profit/loss) are not in the reports but calculated from the information in the reports.

Sean

* I find the bowls profit/loss interesting as most of the schools report spending more on bowl games and coaches bonuses than they directly receive for playing in them. And generally the bigger the game the bigger the expenses reported and the bigger the loss. Part of that is due to bowl money that goes to the school's conference and is then split among all the conference members.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top