Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
I think it would make a lot of sense to trade Swayman to improve their defense then sign Rask. Their defense is absolutely HORRIBLE and they have no chance if it isn't improved. They really blew it in the off-season with who they signed and didn't sign.
I don't disagree the B's have made some horrendous decisions impacting their blue line, but I'm not sure you're going to get what the B's truly need - another legit top pairing defenseman to go with McAvoy - for Swayman, whose value has to have been eroded somewhat from his tepid start to this season. Paying Ullmark at the level that could/should have been allotted to a top pairing quality defender was the gaffe, and it's hard not to look at Dan Vladar doing pretty well out in Calgary so far and thinking a Swayman/Vladar duo, supplemented by a quality experienced defenseman was the way they needed to go. Oops.
Rask is going to be 35 years old before the end of the regular season, and now he's damaged goods, plus lots of wear and tear over the last 10 or so seasons of carrying the load in Boston. If Swayman or Ullmark can't find better form in the next month or two before the Olympics, no reason not to sign Rask to a short term deal. They're seeing him every day now, they can determine better than anyone else what he's up to, and what he might not be up to. Rask wants to be here, so he'd take a short term deal to show the rest of the league what he's capable of, and then this offseason he'll have some leverage that he currently doesn't have to drive a better deal - if not in Boston, then somewhere else to his liking.
As I said before, Ullmark is virtually untradeable. And I don't think you get as much as you might want to get for Swayman, so if Rask does get signed, I think Swayman goes to Providence to bide his time, get regular playing time, and wait to see how Tuukka 2.0 turns out this summer. But to be clear, we agree 100%, the B's problem is on the blue line, I just don't think too many (any?) NHL GM's are gonna give you even a second pairing guy whose contract is not expiring for Swayman right now. The B's have too many 3rd pairing types already masquerading on their first and second pairings, selling Swayman short isn't going to fix that problem. Unless you take a shot at an older top pairing guy with an expiring contract, and try to extend him? Kind of what Sweeney did with Hall up front in the latter stages of last season? We'll see ...